Date: 27/08/25 - 03:06 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: 3 straight non-bowl seasons for us  (Read 875 times)

November 22, 2009, 10:47:40 AM
Read 875 times

Allen Evridge

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 40
Bottom line is, we weren't expected to make a bowl & the pundits were accurate. 

Big deal on almost winning the North, we should leave the almost hype for :ku: tards. 

2010, it's a must we make a bowl, especially with the schedule in place...
IP:   68.13.0.82
Hostname:   ip68-13-0-82.om.om.cox.net

November 22, 2009, 12:05:15 PM
Reply #1

RustyWagon

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 25
You can't honestly think that you are good at socking can you?  It's so bad that it's entertaining.  Keep up the good (comically bad) work.

November 22, 2009, 12:10:54 PM
Reply #2

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks
Ya, this is a really, really bad job of socking.

Look, I don't have to tell you that no KSU fans remotely consider the Prince years as being part of any kind of larger trend....'cause you already know that.  So why are you bothering?  :dunno:

November 22, 2009, 12:13:58 PM
Reply #3

Allen Evridge

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 40
You can't honestly think that you are good at socking can you?  It's so bad that it's entertaining.  Keep up the good (comically bad) work.


No socking going on, the laugh is on you & everyone else.

I was in my Royal Purple last night in Lincoln, tailgated with a few guys from Powercat.com that I met a few years ago along with my buddies that live in Kansas (and Omaha).

Were you?  I highly doubt it.  Keep questioning my allegiance, you're throwing darts with a :blindfold:
IP:   68.13.0.82
Hostname:   ip68-13-0-82.om.om.cox.net

November 22, 2009, 12:17:59 PM
Reply #4

Allen Evridge

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 40
Look, I don't have to tell you that no KSU fans remotely consider the Prince years as being part of any kind of larger trend....'cause you already know that.  So why are you bothering?  :dunno:


Look, I am glad Grimace is gone and Snyder is back, believe me. 

However, what Grimace did in his 1st year is a step ahead of what Snyder did this year.  At least Barney beat a Top 25 team in Texas and had our season extended.  That is something that didn't happen this year.   

It's tough when drinking the kool-aid as much as you & others do. 

IP:   68.13.0.82
Hostname:   ip68-13-0-82.om.om.cox.net

November 22, 2009, 12:27:17 PM
Reply #5

thehusker1

  • Wannabe Rivals with KSU !
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 57
Here's an idea, try scheduling some teams in the same division, that way when you say you have 6 or 7 wins, the ncaa wont laugh and say "but 2 were against high school teams, and you lost to Louisian"   If you cant beat teams in 1-A, well, that's just sickning.  It's funny how it's taken this long for your takin the easy road in scheduling to finally burn the purple black.

November 22, 2009, 12:29:42 PM
Reply #6

WillieWannabe

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2233
  • Personal Text
    I may be full of sh*t, but i won't be de-turd.
Here's an idea, try scheduling some teams in the same division, that way when you say you have 6 or 7 wins, the ncaa wont laugh and say "but 2 were against high school teams, and you lost to Louisian"   If you cant beat teams in 1-A, well, that's just sickning.  It's funny how it's taken this long for your takin the easy road in scheduling to finally burn the purple black.

do you know the actual reasons why we had to schedule 2 FCS teams?
I walk out of that tunnel in this building and the passion of our fans, just gets me going. I mean just gives me an adrenaline rush that you guys just don't understand. - Frank Martin

November 22, 2009, 01:41:00 PM
Reply #7

opcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 5189
This team is a bowl team.  So we missed some FG's against Louis. L.

We are better than ISU.


November 22, 2009, 04:22:48 PM
Reply #8

Catfanatic

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 348
Rules are rules but 4 conference wins should be considered more than the ooc. A team that goes 2-6 in conference has no business in a bowl game IMO and a team that goes 6-6 can make it with a 2-6 record. I don't see much difference between beating a u-mass versus a western kentucky or florida-atlantic myself.

November 22, 2009, 05:45:36 PM
Reply #9

Allen Evridge

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 40
This team is a bowl team.



The season is over, our last game was played.

This team is not a bowl team no matter how you try and spin it.

I can't believe how low some of us :kstatriot: have fallen.  Thank goodness this is the internet & other :kstatriot: have higher expectations...

IP:   68.13.0.82
Hostname:   ip68-13-0-82.om.om.cox.net

November 22, 2009, 05:49:45 PM
Reply #10

Catfanatic

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 348
Not spinning anything sockpuppet. Just said the bowl eligibility should be tweeked. BCS wins should count for more than weak ooc game wins, that's all. We are done and I am ok with it, period. Just saying a 2-6 conference team is not bowl worthy either.