A&M beat Tech at their place.

[opcat]

Anyone watch that? How the hell did they do that?

[kcchiefdav]

3rd string QB for Tech had something to do with it. I think it's been shown time and again that if you can keep Tech from getting in rhythm in the first half and maybe get a score or two up on them, then they struggle to get in rhythm for the whole game. Should be interesting to see them play the hawks this week.

[nosolutions]

This may have been the most baffling score i have ever seen. based on the previous two weeks results against us, A&M could have been 100 point underdogs. It also screws up any thoughts that we are either good or bad. you can throw the TTU and A&M games out the window

[PowercatPat]

Anyone watch that? How the hell did they do that?

No, the game wasn't on tv.

[Winters]

Anyone watch that? How the hell did they do that?

They scored more points that tech.





(Sorry had to do it)

[wiley03]

Balance in offense

320 rushing
250 passing

+4 in turnovers (sound familiar?)

[opcat]

scoring solves all problems.

[GP76]

scoring solves all problems.

Plus 8 in turnovers is almost as good as scoring points.  Just ask Haverhill.

[PCR]

I hope this puts an end to the silly game of comparative scores once and for all.  It really shows the flaw in the BCS system.