Date: 30/08/25 - 15:04 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: I really like the "avoid the TE" scheme of OB's offense . . . .  (Read 1449 times)

October 14, 2009, 03:42:07 PM
Read 1449 times

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
nothing like taking a potential  All-American TE and never throwing him the ball, never setting up any plays to specifically throw him the ball, and pretty much relegating him to the role of a blocker.

I guess the fact that in the attempts to throw Mastrud the ball, our fine QB corp has more often than not opted to underthrow the ball by a good 3 or 4 yards or make him have to perform some kind of circus catch. 

But again, nothing like removing one of your better offensive threats completely from the game plan.   :thumbsup:

October 14, 2009, 03:59:23 PM
Reply #1

WavetheWheat

  • Argyle Square
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 734
  • Personal Text
    It's a nlellephant...
V-A-N-I-L-L-A .....how many times do people have to tell you this?

Snyder is waiting to bust out the real offense until the important games.

October 14, 2009, 04:03:39 PM
Reply #2

EllToPay

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1291
  • Personal Text
    Natural Born Leader
nothing like taking a potential  All-American TE and never throwing him the ball, never setting up any plays to specifically throw him the ball, and pretty much relegating him to the role of a blocker.

I guess the fact that in the attempts to throw Mastrud the ball, our fine QB corp has more often than not opted to underthrow the ball by a good 3 or 4 yards or make him have to perform some kind of circus catch. 

But again, nothing like removing one of your better offensive threats completely from the game plan.   :thumbsup:

i stopped after reading this.

surely, you can't be serious?

October 14, 2009, 04:10:38 PM
Reply #3

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
nothing like taking a potential  All-American TE and never throwing him the ball, never setting up any plays to specifically throw him the ball, and pretty much relegating him to the role of a blocker.

I guess the fact that in the attempts to throw Mastrud the ball, our fine QB corp has more often than not opted to underthrow the ball by a good 3 or 4 yards or make him have to perform some kind of circus catch. 

But again, nothing like removing one of your better offensive threats completely from the game plan.   :thumbsup:

i stopped after reading this.

surely, you can't be serious?

My thoughts exactly.

October 14, 2009, 04:39:20 PM
Reply #4

GP76

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 186
Sonof,
You have got a good imagination.  Use it for something constructive instead of always trying to beat down the cats.

October 14, 2009, 04:48:03 PM
Reply #5

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Well how the frank would we ever know if he's an AA TE . . . he never touches the ball.

Don't allow your hate of Prince recruited players to get in the way of your thinking.

He was an Academic AA and you don"t get to be an academic AA without some playing credentials.



« Last Edit: October 14, 2009, 04:51:30 PM by sonofdaxjones »

October 14, 2009, 05:00:53 PM
Reply #6

LesMiserables

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 151
In support of dax, Mastrud was ranked number 12 among "draft eligible" TE's by Phil Steele.  That's sort of "potential AA", I guess.  Of course, that list also leaves out some hotshot underclassmen like the guys at ND and Georgia. 

October 14, 2009, 05:02:14 PM
Reply #7

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
In support of dax, Mastrud was ranked number 12 among "draft eligible" TE's by Phil Steele.  That's sort of "potential AA", I guess.  Of course, that list also leaves out some hotshot underclassmen like the guys at ND and Georgia. 

See, see . . . told you guys. 


October 14, 2009, 05:31:49 PM
Reply #8

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

October 14, 2009, 05:48:57 PM
Reply #9

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

Funny, I don't recall seeing ku mentioned anywhere in this thread, and ku's last defensive effort yielded over 500 yards and 36 points to the "worst team in the conference" at home. 

October 14, 2009, 06:56:57 PM
Reply #10

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
With our Oline, someone has to stay and help protect.  Unfortunately Mastrud is finding that out.  Seems like the pretty traditional 15-20 catch Snyder TE, but maybe less catches b/c he has to protect more.  Snyder put several TEs in the league under the same plan.

October 14, 2009, 06:57:26 PM
Reply #11

Skydog

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1646
Remember vz. UMASS when Carson would throw only to a triple covered Mastrud? At least that's not the scenario anymore.

October 14, 2009, 07:54:56 PM
Reply #12

Bookcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6459
I don't care how potentially good Mastrud is. He's one of our better pass catchers...and we never throw his way.
"You guys want answers that are conversations between John and I. I ain't worried about it. I'm living the dream.... When I start worrying about a contract, I'd be cheating the kids and not doing my job." - Frank Martin

October 14, 2009, 07:57:14 PM
Reply #13

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
guys, this is bill snyder, he'll adapt the offense to fit his personnel.  don't worry.

October 14, 2009, 08:08:33 PM
Reply #14

LimestoneOutcropping

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6938
  • Personal Text
    Skate on Sister School
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

Funny, I don't recall seeing ku mentioned anywhere in this thread, and ku's last defensive effort yielded over 500 yards and 36 points to the "worst team in the conference" at home. 

pwned

October 14, 2009, 08:20:21 PM
Reply #15

Brewcrew

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 672
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

Funny, I don't recall seeing ku mentioned anywhere in this thread, and ku's last defensive effort yielded over 500 yards and 36 points to the "worst team in the conference" at home. 


basically tied for 4th in the big 12 in points given up? hows the ksuck d progressing"

October 14, 2009, 08:31:43 PM
Reply #16

opcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 5189

October 14, 2009, 09:06:26 PM
Reply #17

Big Sam

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 228
nothing like taking a potential  All-American TE and never throwing him the ball, never setting up any plays to specifically throw him the ball, and pretty much relegating him to the role of a blocker.

I guess the fact that in the attempts to throw Mastrud the ball, our fine QB corp has more often than not opted to underthrow the ball by a good 3 or 4 yards or make him have to perform some kind of circus catch. 

But again, nothing like removing one of your better offensive threats completely from the game plan.   :thumbsup:

Uh, dude, if Carson Coffman is the QB Mastrud is about the only dude that ever gets a pass thrown his way.  I'm sure every defense knows it, hence the quadruple coverage that CC tries to fit the late pass in through.

Sam S.
"Looks almost like a glazed doughnut.  Or Joe Francis after a week in prison." - Anthony Bourdain

October 14, 2009, 10:11:57 PM
Reply #18

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

Funny, I don't recall seeing ku mentioned anywhere in this thread, and ku's last defensive effort yielded over 500 yards and 36 points to the "worst team in the conference" at home. 


basically tied for 4th in the big 12 in points given up? hows the ksuck d progressing"


In terms of progress . . . ku just gave up over 500 yards and 26 first downs to an offense that only had 371 yards and 20 first downs against K-State. 

You are an incredible dumbass.




October 14, 2009, 11:01:12 PM
Reply #19

85catbacker

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 209
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

Funny, I don't recall seeing ku mentioned anywhere in this thread, and ku's last defensive effort yielded over 500 yards and 36 points to the "worst team in the conference" at home. 
basically tied for 4th in the big 12 in points given up? hows the ksuck d progressing"
In terms of progress . . . ku just gave up over 500 yards and 26 first downs to an offense that only had 371 yards and 20 first downs against K-State. 

Okay for fun, lets do some projections here.  ku gave up 56.5% more points and 38% more yards to ISU than KSU.  Applying that increase to what KSU gave up to TT, TT will score 103 points on 1,019 total yards against ku.  Likewise, ku scored 70.8% more points and gained 53% more yards against ISU than KSU.  That means ku will score 24 points on 435 yards of total offense against TT.  Factor in that KSU/ISU was a neutral field while ku played ISU at home, and they spread should be greater.

Wow. Isn't it fun to play with numbers.    :lol: :dancin:  :beerchug: :piratecaptain: 

October 15, 2009, 08:10:31 AM
Reply #20

GP76

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 186
Secret memo to all QB's from the clueless idiot coach Bill Snyder:::
"Do not throw to the tight end unless triple covered"
All QB's read and aknowledge by game time each Saturday.

October 15, 2009, 12:24:04 PM
Reply #21

Guscat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 353
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

Funny, I don't recall seeing ku mentioned anywhere in this thread, and ku's last defensive effort yielded over 500 yards and 36 points to the "worst team in the conference" at home. 


basically tied for 4th in the big 12 in points given up? hows the ksuck d progressing"


In terms of progress . . . ku just gave up over 500 yards and 26 first downs to an offense that only had 371 yards and 20 first downs against K-State. 

You are an incredible dumbass.





AND they did it to ku at home on Embezzler Field in Ghetto Stadium.  As I recall, the vaunted hawks get their chance to own Tech at home in a few weeks.

October 15, 2009, 02:44:59 PM
Reply #22

OLD BALLZ

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 82
Well how the frank would we ever know if he's an AA TE . . . he never touches the ball.

Don't allow your hate of Prince recruited players to get in the way of your thinking.

He was an Academic AA and you don"t get to be an academic AA without some playing credentials.





He's only an "ACADEMIC" AA because he's a marketing major.  I mean come on marketing?  Not the toughest major out there. 

October 15, 2009, 04:11:26 PM
Reply #23

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

Funny, I don't recall seeing ku mentioned anywhere in this thread, and ku's last defensive effort yielded over 500 yards and 36 points to the "worst team in the conference" at home. 


basically tied for 4th in the big 12 in points given up? hows the ksuck d progressing"


In terms of progress . . . ku just gave up over 500 yards and 26 first downs to an offense that only had 371 yards and 20 first downs against K-State. 

You are an incredible dumbass.










Two different games.  K-State tried to play small ball and control the clock.  Iowa State was also without Alexander Robinson for pretty much the entire game.  That being said, do you really believe that K-State's defense is better than ku's?


 :confused:

October 15, 2009, 04:23:33 PM
Reply #24

Dick Knewheizel

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 638
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

Funny, I don't recall seeing ku mentioned anywhere in this thread, and ku's last defensive effort yielded over 500 yards and 36 points to the "worst team in the conference" at home. 


basically tied for 4th in the big 12 in points given up? hows the ksuck d progressing"


In terms of progress . . . ku just gave up over 500 yards and 26 first downs to an offense that only had 371 yards and 20 first downs against K-State. 

You are an incredible dumbass.










Two different games.  K-State tried to play small ball and control the clock.  Iowa State was also without Alexander Robinson for pretty much the entire game.  That being said, do you really believe that K-State's defense is better than ku's?


 :confused:

I didn't know there was a team in this conference who's defense was worse than uk's  :confused:

October 22, 2009, 12:04:37 AM
Reply #25

wazucat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 17
nothing like taking a potential  All-American TE and never throwing him the ball, never setting up any plays to specifically throw him the ball, and pretty much relegating him to the role of a blocker.

I guess the fact that in the attempts to throw Mastrud the ball, our fine QB corp has more often than not opted to underthrow the ball by a good 3 or 4 yards or make him have to perform some kind of circus catch. 

But again, nothing like removing one of your better offensive threats completely from the game plan.   :thumbsup:

Pick on another fault defect or shortcoming for Bill to work on against CU.  Your excellent rant on the TE's worked very well against the Aggies.

October 22, 2009, 10:41:45 AM
Reply #26

Bookcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6459
Hey, at least the defense looked fundamentally sound against Texas Tech.

Funny, I don't recall seeing ku mentioned anywhere in this thread, and ku's last defensive effort yielded over 500 yards and 36 points to the "worst team in the conference" at home. 


basically tied for 4th in the big 12 in points given up? hows the ksuck d progressing"


In terms of progress . . . ku just gave up over 500 yards and 26 first downs to an offense that only had 371 yards and 20 first downs against K-State. 

You are an incredible dumbass.










Two different games.  K-State tried to play small ball and control the clock.  Iowa State was also without Alexander Robinson for pretty much the entire game.  That being said, do you really believe that K-State's defense is better than ku's?


 :confused:

small ball and controlling the clock might have given ku a victory over the Buffs...but since they can't run the ball........
"You guys want answers that are conversations between John and I. I ain't worried about it. I'm living the dream.... When I start worrying about a contract, I'd be cheating the kids and not doing my job." - Frank Martin

October 22, 2009, 11:09:15 AM
Reply #27

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
nothing like taking a potential  All-American TE and never throwing him the ball, never setting up any plays to specifically throw him the ball, and pretty much relegating him to the role of a blocker.

I guess the fact that in the attempts to throw Mastrud the ball, our fine QB corp has more often than not opted to underthrow the ball by a good 3 or 4 yards or make him have to perform some kind of circus catch. 

But again, nothing like removing one of your better offensive threats completely from the game plan.   :thumbsup:

Pick on another fault defect or shortcoming for Bill to work on against CU.  Your excellent rant on the TE's worked very well against the Aggies.

Avoiding putting the ball in Lamark Brown's hands is great.