Date: 27/08/25 - 18:44 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: In FY 2006  (Read 3819 times)

October 19, 2006, 02:05:29 PM
Read 3819 times

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
and for the 3rd or 4th consecutive year.

The KSU EstroCat B-ball Program had a net operating loss of over $1.05 milllion dollars.

Had KSU not hosted the WNIT games, the operating loss would've been worse.






October 19, 2006, 02:06:20 PM
Reply #1

Saulbadguy

  • Guest

October 19, 2006, 02:14:17 PM
Reply #2

catfan28

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1224

October 19, 2006, 02:18:24 PM
Reply #3

KSt8er

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1550
  • Personal Text
    AAAAAHHHHH AAAAHHH
Wow, that is a LOT less than I expected for any D1 womens team, WAY TO GO FANS!!!!!!

 :D
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." -- Sir Winston Churchill

October 19, 2006, 02:21:28 PM
Reply #4

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
and for the 3rd or 4th consecutive year.

The KSU EstroCat B-ball Program had a net operating loss of over $1.05 milllion dollars.

Had KSU not hosted the WNIT games, the operating loss would've been worse.







Is your contention that KSU should do away with the women's program?


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

October 19, 2006, 02:24:01 PM
Reply #5

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
If KSU is going to lose a million a year, every year, at least win something besides the WNIT.

 :tongue:

October 19, 2006, 02:26:53 PM
Reply #6

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
If KSU is going to lose a million a year, every year, at least win something besides the WNIT.

 :tongue:
I realize that is probably TIC..but you know the Womens program is good for the university, and the fans.


October 19, 2006, 02:32:45 PM
Reply #7

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Sure ... and it would be even better if they just won something significant.

Lets get what we're paying for, or find somebody else who can get it done besides Coach Conflicted.


October 19, 2006, 02:36:48 PM
Reply #8

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.

October 19, 2006, 02:43:54 PM
Reply #9

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
Sure ... and it would be even better if they just won something significant.

Lets get what we're paying for, or find somebody else who can get it done besides Coach Conflicted.


It could always be worse. Much, much worse.  As long as they are winning alot of games, who really cares?

October 19, 2006, 02:47:14 PM
Reply #10

snart

  • Guest
There are only two sports, at the most, at any school that make money: football and men’s basketball.  And at some schools one of these, or both, don’t make money.  That is a fact of life.  And the non-revenue sports not only include women’s basketball but also track, wrestling, baseball, gymnastics, swimming, hockey, soccer, lacrosse, rowing... you name it, and it loses money.  But all these other sports programs bring a level of prestige and presence to a school and in my opinion are most certainly necessary.  So get used to it and just be glad that at K-State the football, and now the men’s basketball, programs do bring in the money necessary to field these other teams.

October 19, 2006, 03:02:42 PM
Reply #11

coitus

  • Guest
mods - can this be moved to the bag 'o tricks folder?

apparently reject fan doesn't understand the complex directory structure of this message board.

October 19, 2006, 03:04:36 PM
Reply #12

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
You all are missing the point ... I have no problem with KSU pouring big bucks into women's hoops.  I'd just like to see that actually start to pay off sometime in the near future.

I can't see losing over $1 million a year for mediocrity.

Coitus ... apparently you're just a complete douchebag who doesn't understand that Timmy's bag o' tricks forum sucks.




October 19, 2006, 03:08:00 PM
Reply #13

coitus

  • Guest
the bag 'o tricks bag does indeed suck.  no one reads it.  it contains only the worst of the refuse.

i knew this when i asked your thread to be moved there.

can you connect the two dots?

October 19, 2006, 03:08:56 PM
Reply #14

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Yeah I did, and it looks a lot like your family tree.


October 19, 2006, 03:10:54 PM
Reply #15

coitus

  • Guest
you are the crown princess of the bag 'o tricks forum.

celebrate accordingly.

October 19, 2006, 03:12:23 PM
Reply #16

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
I don't think I've ever posted there.

But hey ... it usually takes a queen to recognize a prince.


October 19, 2006, 04:13:02 PM
Reply #17

Dirty Sanchez

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4638
  • Personal Text
    Powertard Un-approved

October 19, 2006, 04:25:30 PM
Reply #18

coitus

  • Guest
reject -- clean your glasses, weiser's tea bag has blurred your vision.  no one mentioned a prince.

 :ustupid:


October 19, 2006, 04:30:09 PM
Reply #19

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
"You're the crown princess"

Okay ... Prince ... Princess ... it takes a queen to create both.

Nice photos on the football board ... It's good to see your type interested in manly pursuits ... sports that is, not actually pursuing men.   





« Last Edit: October 19, 2006, 04:32:23 PM by sonofdaxjones »

October 19, 2006, 04:33:33 PM
Reply #20

DrJamesANaismith

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 243

October 19, 2006, 04:38:13 PM
Reply #21

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Having to put that lifesized picture of Giles in Timeout must  have been tough StalkerFreakBoy.

You're in our prayer circle.




October 19, 2006, 04:41:43 PM
Reply #22

DrJamesANaismith

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 243
How'd things work out for you on phognet today Daxi?

October 19, 2006, 04:45:33 PM
Reply #23

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Fine ... I guess you put down the Jergins long enough to complain to Tom didn't ya, ya little StalkerFreak.


October 19, 2006, 04:49:02 PM
Reply #24

DrJamesANaismith

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 243
Sorry son, I wasn't around to witness your implosion. I'm sure it was pure entertainment...as it usually is when you're getting bent over.

 :beerchug:

October 19, 2006, 04:52:58 PM
Reply #25

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Implosion ... you're guys didn't like me making fun of coach hairpiece.  There's nothing to implode over unless you're a squawk fan.

Bentover?? Come on man ... please don't bring your sexual proclivities over to this family board StalkerFreak.


October 19, 2006, 05:17:50 PM
Reply #26

DrJamesANaismith

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 243
You get abused every time you show up. You're slightly out of your element there daxi. You always have been, and you're not even bright enough to know it.

How many boards are you currently banned from? That should give you a clue....but it won't.

October 19, 2006, 05:18:09 PM
Reply #27

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
You all are missing the point ... I have no problem with KSU pouring big bucks into women's hoops.  I'd just like to see that actually start to pay off sometime in the near future.

I can't see losing over $1 million a year for mediocrity.

Coitus ... apparently you're just a complete douchebag who doesn't understand that Timmy's bag o' tricks forum sucks.




Would you rather us lose $2 million a year for an awful team? 

I just pulled that number out of my ass - but can you check to see how much money ku loses?  Colorado? Iowa State?

October 19, 2006, 05:47:08 PM
Reply #28

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
You get abused every time you show up. You're slightly out of your element there daxi. You always have been, and you're not even bright enough to know it.

How many boards are you currently banned from? That should give you a clue....but it won't.


You're right, with the "great posters" like St. LouisJaySquawk (cochair ku marketing club refreshment committee), addidasquawk, DocSquawkSmith, the now disappeared Jayhoax, the now disappeared GoldBrick, the ubiquitous PittsburghJaySquawk, and the timely Steel "I played for bear bryant dammit" Squawk ... I am out my element, god love'm and  you.    Doc ... they get angry over a sig line ... a freaking sig line.   You can't have any fun with guys who are that thin skinned. 

Plus, don't even attempt to claim that Flocknet exists on some plain (or is it plane ... indeed I think it is) of higher browishness (not a word for you ku folks) ... that simply falls back into the ku mindset of:  If we tell ourselves something enough times, it has to be true.

You continually reference things like the ability to be "bent over" on a BBS, or to be "owned" on a BBS ... come on now, how absolutely retarded is that concept StalkerFreak ... you're right any person that thinks a long those lines is out of my element.

Writers Note:  I am very disappointed in this lengthy reply to StalkerFreakBoy.   :yuck:


October 19, 2006, 08:12:50 PM
Reply #29

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
I think adidashawk/booyahku is ok, along with All4ku, pittsburgjayhawk, and BMWJayhawk.

Naismith is a moron. He still thinks you and pissclams are the same person.