Date: 22/08/25 - 09:44 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Possible infraction on Seff?  (Read 706 times)

June 30, 2009, 11:18:16 PM
Read 706 times

Iceberg

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1318
  • Personal Text
    DOD Take Two
If the Henrys have yet to take courses of sign a LOI, and Seff is talking to the press about this whole situation... doesn't that violate recruiting rules?
  <======= 125 Days of Dominance

"I laughed at the guy who had the Auburn logo upside down in his sig. I guess he thinks we are Texas." - AUslug, August 7th

June 30, 2009, 11:23:14 PM
Reply #1

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
If the Henrys have yet to take courses of sign a LOI, and Seff is talking to the press about this whole situation... doesn't that violate recruiting rules?

no.
"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

June 30, 2009, 11:25:19 PM
Reply #2

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Apparently they've signed a grant in aid agreement.  But I need to talk a look at NCAA.org to verify that a grant in aid agreement allows a coach to discuss a recruit.   It probably does, but for my own edification I want to know.


June 30, 2009, 11:40:54 PM
Reply #3

Iceberg

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1318
  • Personal Text
    DOD Take Two
Gotcha, thanks for the fill in
  <======= 125 Days of Dominance

"I laughed at the guy who had the Auburn logo upside down in his sig. I guess he thinks we are Texas." - AUslug, August 7th

July 02, 2009, 12:17:28 PM
Reply #4

cokansan

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 344
Where is Sonofdax?  Shouldn't he ba all over this?
PAY HEED ALL WHO ENTER
  BEWARE OF THE PHOG

July 02, 2009, 12:27:41 PM
Reply #5

hillwalking03

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 433
Since Xavier already signed a LOI with Memphis, he was not allowed to sign another one.  That's the NCAA's rule.  Since CJ is a walkon, there are no rules preventing Self from discussing him. 

July 02, 2009, 01:19:07 PM
Reply #6

Iceberg

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1318
  • Personal Text
    DOD Take Two
Since Xavier already signed a LOI with Memphis, he was not allowed to sign another one.  That's the NCAA's rule.  Since CJ is a walkon, there are no rules preventing Self from discussing him. 

Gotcha. Sometimes these rules get so complicated it is hard to see whats what.
  <======= 125 Days of Dominance

"I laughed at the guy who had the Auburn logo upside down in his sig. I guess he thinks we are Texas." - AUslug, August 7th

July 02, 2009, 03:26:56 PM
Reply #7

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
Where is Sonofdax?  Shouldn't he ba all over this?

Are you retarded?

July 02, 2009, 03:31:13 PM
Reply #8

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Nice to know Daxipad's cult following is alive and well. 



 :flush:

July 02, 2009, 03:32:41 PM
Reply #9

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
Nice to know Daxipad's cult following is alive and well. 



 :flush:

You're boring.

July 02, 2009, 03:40:04 PM
Reply #10

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
It's a very thin line between being able to make public comment on grant in aid only kids and and walk on kids.  It's always been my understanding that you couldn't public-ally comment on walk on's until after the start of school, or even after the start of practice.


July 02, 2009, 03:43:44 PM
Reply #11

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Both Henry brothers are enrolled at ku for the fall semester. 

July 02, 2009, 03:49:23 PM
Reply #12

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Enrolling and actually attending the school are two entirely different things. 

This is almost getting back to your:

"I have slant and phog.net premium membership therefore I know that doesn't happen" logic

Or . . . .

You're inability to understand the difference between compulsory and/or voluntary fees/charges.


July 02, 2009, 03:50:17 PM
Reply #13

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Enrolling and actually attending the school are two entirely different things. 

This is almost getting back to your:

"I have slant and phog.net premium membership therefore I know that doesn't happen" logic

Or . . . .

You're inability to understand the difference between compulsory and/or voluntary fees/charges.





Hmmm... how about the ability to decipher between "your" and "you're?" 

July 02, 2009, 03:53:47 PM
Reply #14

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
This is what you are left with Bentard:

"Dax is bat$hit crazy"

and

Grammatical and spelling errors.

You're at the lowest ebb of a complete beatdown.


July 02, 2009, 06:01:34 PM
Reply #15

hillwalking03

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 433
It's a very thin line between being able to make public comment on grant in aid only kids and and walk on kids.  It's always been my understanding that you couldn't public-ally comment on walk on's until after the start of school, or even after the start of practice.



Not arguing, but does it make a difference if the kid only signed a grant-in-aid or if he previously signed a LOI and then signed a grant in aid?  Do they even make that distinction?