Date: 24/08/25 - 06:32 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: HBBIQ Discssion Thread  (Read 1466 times)

June 26, 2009, 09:29:27 AM
Read 1466 times

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
I'll start it off. 

1) Is Denis Clemente good or what?  I can't decide.  Obviously great sometimes but his disappearance at times is discouraging. 
2) I love it when our team is just bombing 3s.  Gonna be honest, I'm worried about not having a confirmed dead eye 3 bomber on the team.  I like saying "FOR THREE" so obviously this is a pretty big concern for me. 
3) Thoughts on the conference?  Gonna be pretty tough imo.
<---------Click the ball

June 26, 2009, 09:32:57 AM
Reply #1

yosh

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3071
1.  Good, not great.  He's like Larry Reid, if every so often Larry Reid morphed into DJ Augustine.

2.  "Fools gold."

3.  Certainly tough.  Thank god for the warm, fuzzy, security blanket of the Nortards.
Cada hombre un gato salvaje!

June 26, 2009, 09:35:46 AM
Reply #2

EllToPay

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1291
  • Personal Text
    Natural Born Leader
I have very high BBIQ, so I will participate.

1.)  Will be better with low post players that can rebound his ridiculous running shots.

2.) Even if we just hit a short jumper, say "For Three!" anyway. Will you get you lots of attention in the stands.

3.) Very tough. Legit teams that can win conference: EMAW, UT, OU and OSU.

 :eyeseeyou:

June 26, 2009, 09:37:11 AM
Reply #3

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
Yosh brings up a good point re. the nortards.  Wild guess:  Everyone talks about how great of a job Doc is doing because he manages to "scrap" by with a few wins with his no talent having roster.  Really looks to be a great year for the "big 3" nortards.  Could be the break through win in Lincoln that our team so desperately needs.    
<---------Click the ball

June 26, 2009, 09:38:08 AM
Reply #4

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
1.)  Will be better with low post players that can rebound his ridiculous running shots.

Ell guy brings up a good point re. how much I like Denis' runners.  Love those.
<---------Click the ball

June 26, 2009, 09:48:24 AM
Reply #5

EllToPay

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1291
  • Personal Text
    Natural Born Leader
Could be the break through win in Lincoln that our team so desperately needs.    

Would make the year.

June 26, 2009, 09:49:52 AM
Reply #6

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
(1) Above good, not great.
(2)  I am skeptical about the "we have low post players so now we're going to shoot better from 3" talking point.  I mean, sure, you're probably going to get some better looks, but you still have to be good enough to hit them, and the guys that can do that (Fred and Buchi) are gone.  I don't expect Jake or Denis's 3pt % to jump up all that much this year.  
(3)  Conference breaks down like this, imo:  ku, then a battle for 2nd-4th b/t UT, A&M, OSU, battle of 5th -7th b/t MU, OU, KSU, battle for 8th-12th b/t the rest.  KSU could sneak up into the 2nd -4th battle since it has A&M, UT, and OSU at home this year.

June 26, 2009, 09:54:56 AM
Reply #7

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
UT, A&M, OSU

Yeah, but we get NU/CU/ISU twice each.  I mean, that's 6 wins there barring hilton or doc magic biting us in the ass. Would be terribly disappointing to end our unpresidented first round bye streak while fielding a team this strong. 
<---------Click the ball

June 26, 2009, 09:55:04 AM
Reply #8

mcmwcat

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3481
  • Personal Text
    Now that's how you get out a f***ing blood stain.
1.)  Will be better with low post players that can rebound his ridiculous running shots.

Ell guy brings up a good point re. how much I like Denis' runners.  Love those.

sweet sweet tear drops
When I was a kid growing up in the projects, I used to dream of going into space, of escaping the slums, of killing an Ewok!

June 26, 2009, 10:01:40 AM
Reply #9

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Better inside game helps guards . . . we will have guys who can finish in the lane.

nother question . . . if Dom Sutton can actually get more shots to start falling (I think the dude has horrible luck shooting myself) how much of a monster will he be . . . and will Big 12 refs finally give this guy a break for god's sake???


June 26, 2009, 10:02:18 AM
Reply #10

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
1.  http://kenpom.com/team.php?y=2009&team=Kansas%20St.

2.  shooting lots of 3s is more important than hitting a really high %.  seriously.  so, pullen is good at that.

3.  the 2008-2009 big east of the 2009-2010 midwest.
"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

June 26, 2009, 10:04:19 AM
Reply #11

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
Dom is his own worst enemy. I have a theory that, if given the right prescription drugs, he would be really good.  
« Last Edit: June 26, 2009, 10:06:23 AM by steve dave »
<---------Click the ball

June 26, 2009, 10:51:27 AM
Reply #12

PowercatPat

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2578
(1) Above good, not great.
(2)  I am skeptical about the "we have low post players so now we're going to shoot better from 3" talking point.  I mean, sure, you're probably going to get some better looks, but you still have to be good enough to hit them, and the guys that can do that (Fred and Buchi) are gone.  I don't expect Jake or Denis's 3pt % to jump up all that much this year.  
(3)  Conference breaks down like this, imo:  ku, then a battle for 2nd-4th b/t UT, A&M, OSU, battle of 5th -7th b/t MU, OU, KSU, battle for 8th-12th b/t the rest.  KSU could sneak up into the 2nd -4th battle since it has A&M, UT, and OSU at home this year.

We will definitely finish higher than A&M, and probably OSU because we get the Nortards. We also play both at home so I don't see why we shouldn't finish higher than both.

June 26, 2009, 10:55:23 AM
Reply #13

catdude33

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1600
How many teams does the big 12 get into the dance this year.  6 or 7?

June 26, 2009, 10:56:12 AM
Reply #14

EllToPay

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1291
  • Personal Text
    Natural Born Leader
(3)  Conference breaks down like this, imo:  ku, then a battle for 2nd-4th b/t UT, A&M, OSU, battle of 5th -7th b/t MU, OU, KSU, battle for 8th-12th b/t the rest.  KSU could sneak up into the 2nd -4th battle since it has A&M, UT, and OSU at home this year.

Showing LBBIQ here. Thread title clearly signifies we would like HBBIQ discussion.

June 26, 2009, 11:21:47 AM
Reply #15

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
(3)  Conference breaks down like this, imo:  ku, then a battle for 2nd-4th b/t UT, A&M, OSU, battle of 5th -7th b/t MU, OU, KSU, battle for 8th-12th b/t the rest.  KSU could sneak up into the 2nd -4th battle since it has A&M, UT, and OSU at home this year.

Showing LBBIQ here. Thread title clearly signifies we would like HBBIQ discussion.

A&M and OSU played in the south last year (and KSU played in the North) and still managed to finish in a tie with us.  The north, imo, won't be as tardish as normal.  ISU won't be as bad as they were last year.

June 26, 2009, 11:44:00 AM
Reply #16

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
(3)  Conference breaks down like this, imo:  ku, then a battle for 2nd-4th b/t UT, A&M, OSU, battle of 5th -7th b/t MU, OU, KSU, battle for 8th-12th b/t the rest.  KSU could sneak up into the 2nd -4th battle since it has A&M, UT, and OSU at home this year.

hey! we might hit 7th!

take a hike, loser. :rolleyes:
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 26, 2009, 11:44:30 AM
Reply #17

feralchat

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2160
If there was a Mensa for BB fans, I'd be its president.
1. Needs consistency. Third year in the program, second year as starter should make a big diffence in this regard. But still the fastest player in the league. Would love to have on the bigs have an Ed Nealy type outlet pass.
2. Yeah, best 3-pts shooters left. A concern.
3. Schedule lines up well for us. EMAW year.

June 26, 2009, 11:45:19 AM
Reply #18

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
(3)  Conference breaks down like this, imo:  ku, then a battle for 2nd-4th b/t UT, A&M, OSU, battle of 5th -7th b/t MU, OU, KSU, battle for 8th-12th b/t the rest.  KSU could sneak up into the 2nd -4th battle since it has A&M, UT, and OSU at home this year.

Showing LBBIQ here. Thread title clearly signifies we would like HBBIQ discussion.

A&M and OSU played in the south last year (and KSU played in the North) and still managed to finish in a tie with us.  The north, imo, won't be as tardish as normal.  ISU won't be as bad as they were last year.

Yeah
<---------Click the ball

June 26, 2009, 11:47:01 AM
Reply #19

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Quote
1.  Good, not great.  He's like Larry Reid, if every so often Larry Reid morphed into DJ Augustine.

He's much better than Reid.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 26, 2009, 11:53:40 AM
Reply #20

catdude33

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1600
imo a big factor this season will be whether or not the freshmen guards can come in and take every single one of c merr's minutes away.  If they struggle and c merr gets Fred Brownish mins. it's going to suck.

June 26, 2009, 06:05:09 PM
Reply #21

A-Lishious

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 351
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Puft
I'll start it off. 

1) Is Denis Clemente good or what?  I can't decide.  Obviously great sometimes but his disappearance at times is discouraging. 
2) I love it when our team is just bombing 3s.  Gonna be honest, I'm worried about not having a confirmed dead eye 3 bomber on the team.  I like saying "FOR THREE" so obviously this is a pretty big concern for me. 
3) Thoughts on the conference?  Gonna be pretty tough imo.

1) Clemente = good. Nothing else to say. Dude is legit. Could be better at D but he can drive and dish with the best.

2) I dont think KSU will need to bomb threes this year. With Judge/Kelly/Lou/Samuels, one of them is bound to be good offensively. Thats also some good depth. Three's wont be needed at such a redic rate.

3) ku and UT for 1st. Not going to give it to the Koo. UT will be far better then they were last year although they dont have a whole hell of alot of depth down low. KSU, OSU, A&M, OU, baylor will be fighting for whats left. Pretty typical. But, overall, the level of talent throughout the league will be, on average, higher then its ever been or damn close to it. Should be an awesome year. BigXII = Best conference in NCAA next year.

June 26, 2009, 06:43:21 PM
Reply #22

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
How many teams does the big 12 get into the dance this year.  6 or 7?

7, maybe 8.
"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

June 27, 2009, 02:25:53 AM
Reply #23

nicname

  • Guest
I'll start it off. 

1) Is Denis Clemente good or what?  I can't decide.  Obviously great sometimes but his disappearance at times is discouraging. 

You know he is good, even when his shot isn't falling he is helping our team in other ways( defense, setting up teammates, punching opponents, egging on opposing crowds.) And yes his runners will lead to some monstrous putbacks by WJ.

2) I love it when our team is just bombing 3s.  Gonna be honest, I'm worried about not having a confirmed dead eye 3 bomber on the team.  I like saying "FOR THREE" so obviously this is a pretty big concern for me. 

"FOR THREE"  is truly one of the top shelf showings of EMAW.  I think we will still bomb it at a pretty high rate.  Having guys on the block like Kelly and WJ will free up more open looks from outside.  I miss Fred Brown already.


3) Thoughts on the conference?  Gonna be pretty tough imo.

Yes, it will be tough but no tougher than usual IMHO.  Really, KSU is the additional tough team, and we dont have to play ourselves.   Obviously UT and ku are going to be Final four caliber and I think KSU is the thrid best team on paper.  I think we steal at least one win out of the three games vs those teams.  After that ATM and OU are going to be pretty good, though ou will have quite a fall off without BG.  ATM is going to be solid but if I remember correctly they lost a key guy or two the they expected to have back.  The rest of the Big 12 is  :sleep: MU will fall off hard and the rest of the nortards will continue to be the downies of the Big 12.  TT will be better but still suck. Baylor and OSU are enigmas and could either be good or suck IMHO.  I think OSU is a better bet to be good than BU.


Also, catzacker your conference predictions are  :jerkoff:

June 27, 2009, 06:53:20 AM
Reply #24

Paul11

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 364
I never have liked Clemente. If he can add a dribble drive kick or the ability to pass to our bigs down low while cutting in to the lane than he will be much improved. He's going to flourish in the up-tempo situations as long as the big men are willing to follow him down the court.

The 3 is going to be a huge question mark. Pullen is going to be the best player on the court. He'll have to step up on the defensive end, though. As long as someone can stretch the defense out so people can't collapse in the lane and clog it we'll be in okay shape. Hell, even a mid-range game can fix this issue.

The conference is going to great. It's going to be one of the best conferences in the country. Easily.
If you're not making mistakes, then you're not doing anything. I'm positive that a doer makes mistakes-John Wooden

June 27, 2009, 08:44:45 PM
Reply #25

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
good points about the three.

It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 27, 2009, 09:05:32 PM
Reply #26

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
I never have liked Clemente. If he can add a dribble drive kick or the ability to pass to our bigs down low while cutting in to the lane than he will be much improved. He's going to flourish in the up-tempo situations as long as the big men are willing to follow him down the court.

The 3 is going to be a huge question mark. Pullen is going to be the best player on the court. He'll have to step up on the defensive end, though. As long as someone can stretch the defense out so people can't collapse in the lane and clog it we'll be in okay shape. Hell, even a mid-range game can fix this issue.

The conference is going to great. It's going to be one of the best conferences in the country. Easily.

You never liked Clemente?  Jesus dude.
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

June 27, 2009, 09:34:05 PM
Reply #27

doom

  • Muzzled Poster
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 9952
good points about the three.



We lost that game.  And that game was a prime example of the 3 =ing fools gold.


I still want my cooler, bitches!

June 27, 2009, 10:41:45 PM
Reply #28

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
f*cking K-State Proud, gtfoomf
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

June 27, 2009, 11:11:31 PM
Reply #29

Paul11

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 364
I never have liked Clemente. If he can add a dribble drive kick or the ability to pass to our bigs down low while cutting in to the lane than he will be much improved. He's going to flourish in the up-tempo situations as long as the big men are willing to follow him down the court.

The 3 is going to be a huge question mark. Pullen is going to be the best player on the court. He'll have to step up on the defensive end, though. As long as someone can stretch the defense out so people can't collapse in the lane and clog it we'll be in okay shape. Hell, even a mid-range game can fix this issue.

The conference is going to great. It's going to be one of the best conferences in the country. Easily.

You never liked Clemente?  Jesus dude.


He is too outta control. He was great in the Texas win but he shoots way to many jump shots.
If you're not making mistakes, then you're not doing anything. I'm positive that a doer makes mistakes-John Wooden