Date: 27/07/25 - 01:41 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: 185-88-1 (.678) in the last 20 years  (Read 578 times)

June 12, 2009, 02:57:51 PM
Read 578 times

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 12, 2009, 02:59:53 PM
Reply #1

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Agreed.

We'll still be going over 600 losses here soon.  However, without the last 20 years, we would've surpassed 600 losses a long time ago.


June 12, 2009, 03:01:52 PM
Reply #2

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
20 years is a long time. 68% over such a long period is phenomenal, really.

600 losses only shows how amazing our program is. it's our identity.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 12, 2009, 03:09:06 PM
Reply #3

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Agreed . . . it would've been very easy to for K-State to chuck it and give up in 1989. 

I do give credit to the Weefer and to guys like Steve Miller for gutting it out back then, and allowing us to bitch and moan about 5-7 seasons, when that would've been the 3rd best season K-State had in the previous 30 years before 1989.


June 12, 2009, 08:51:31 PM
Reply #4

Burroughsks88

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 7
Uh, are you sure you know how to add correctly fatty?

K-State is 153-85-1 over the last 20 seasons (1989-2008).  That's a .642 winning percentage.

http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/big12/kansas_state/yearly_totals.php

June 12, 2009, 08:56:21 PM
Reply #5

The1BigWillie

  • Guest
I like Fatty's math better.

June 12, 2009, 09:01:25 PM
Reply #6

Burroughsks88

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 7
I like Fatty's math better.

Me too.  :dancin:

This is why Bill is so great, because: the previous 50 seasons to Bill Snyder's arrival, 1939-1988, K-State's record was 122-378-11.  That's a .249 winning percentage.  
« Last Edit: June 12, 2009, 09:16:39 PM by Burroughsks88 »

June 13, 2009, 03:31:20 AM
Reply #7

swish1

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1168
Uh, are you sure you know how to add correctly fatty?

K-State is 153-85-1 over the last 20 seasons (1989-2008).  That's a .642 winning percentage.

http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/div_ia/big12/kansas_state/yearly_totals.php

whatever fatty says is true, facts dont matter.

June 13, 2009, 11:10:50 AM
Reply #8

EmporiaWildcat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 925
I'd much rather have a 69 year old coach than one that weighs 400+ pounds.