Date: 15/08/25 - 10:26 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Windows XP mode in Windows 7  (Read 1804 times)

May 05, 2009, 02:48:06 PM
Reply #30

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
They are including XP because many business use very old legacy productivity applications that have not seen updates in years, and are incompatible with anything newer than XP

they're including XP because many enterprise users realized that Vista was junk and refused to "upgrade" to microsoft's new OS.  microsoft is hoping to trick the enterprise user into believing that 7 is not Vista related, even though it's exactly what Saul said it was a few posts back- a rebranded Vista that now has the ability to appear like the OS they're used to using.

if i'm an enterprise user why do i need my productivity applications to be compatible with anything newer than XP?  you do realize who's fault it is, if my productivity aps are not compatible with anything newer than XP, right?  microsofts.  MS chose to invent the need for a new OS.

they should have just continued NT's development through XP with their service pack crap & figure out a way to charge people for its development and continued support.  instead, they're now launching Vista Part 2.   i'm sure the new OS will launch will a lot fewer problems but the whole mess could have been avoided.

You're more boring than bentard.

May 05, 2009, 03:20:02 PM
Reply #31

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
They are including XP because many business use very old legacy productivity applications that have not seen updates in years, and are incompatible with anything newer than XP

they're including XP because many enterprise users realized that Vista was junk and refused to "upgrade" to microsoft's new OS.  microsoft is hoping to trick the enterprise user into believing that 7 is not Vista related, even though it's exactly what Saul said it was a few posts back- a rebranded Vista that now has the ability to appear like the OS they're used to using.

if i'm an enterprise user why do i need my productivity applications to be compatible with anything newer than XP?  you do realize who's fault it is, if my productivity aps are not compatible with anything newer than XP, right?  microsofts.  MS chose to invent the need for a new OS.

they should have just continued NT's development through XP with their service pack crap & figure out a way to charge people for its development and continued support.  instead, they're now launching Vista Part 2.   i'm sure the new OS will launch will a lot fewer problems but the whole mess could have been avoided.

You're more boring than bentard.

talk about boring... :blank:



Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

May 05, 2009, 03:54:16 PM
Reply #32

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
They are including XP because many business use very old legacy productivity applications that have not seen updates in years, and are incompatible with anything newer than XP

they're including XP because many enterprise users realized that Vista was junk and refused to "upgrade" to microsoft's new OS.  microsoft is hoping to trick the enterprise user into believing that 7 is not Vista related, even though it's exactly what Saul said it was a few posts back- a rebranded Vista that now has the ability to appear like the OS they're used to using.

if i'm an enterprise user why do i need my productivity applications to be compatible with anything newer than XP?  you do realize who's fault it is, if my productivity aps are not compatible with anything newer than XP, right?  microsofts.  MS chose to invent the need for a new OS.

they should have just continued NT's development through XP with their service pack crap & figure out a way to charge people for its development and continued support.  instead, they're now launching Vista Part 2.   i'm sure the new OS will launch will a lot fewer problems but the whole mess could have been avoided.

You're more boring than bentard.

talk about boring... :blank:



I was...  8-)

May 05, 2009, 05:28:20 PM
Reply #33

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
They are including XP because many business use very old legacy productivity applications that have not seen updates in years, and are incompatible with anything newer than XP

they're including XP because many enterprise users realized that Vista was junk and refused to "upgrade" to microsoft's new OS.  microsoft is hoping to trick the enterprise user into believing that 7 is not Vista related, even though it's exactly what Saul said it was a few posts back- a rebranded Vista that now has the ability to appear like the OS they're used to using.

if i'm an enterprise user why do i need my productivity applications to be compatible with anything newer than XP?  you do realize who's fault it is, if my productivity aps are not compatible with anything newer than XP, right?  microsofts.  MS chose to invent the need for a new OS.

they should have just continued NT's development through XP with their service pack crap & figure out a way to charge people for its development and continued support.  instead, they're now launching Vista Part 2.   i'm sure the new OS will launch will a lot fewer problems but the whole mess could have been avoided.
Vista, and now Windows 7 really make an admins life easier, in a perfect world.  Most developers are making their apps Vista/W7 compatible now a days, but it is still tough for businesses to adopt the new standard.  I think Vista/W7 offer features for admins and users that are valuable over what XP offers. XP is a solid OS but it's getting long in the tooth and relies on old technology, especially the x86 versions.

I don't think it's Microsofts fault for not provide support for legacy applications.  Hell, we still run apps that are designed for 95 just because the new app would cost more to buy than supporting the old app does.  I do like that we are getting thrown a bone here with the Windows XP mode, it will make migration alot easier.

May 05, 2009, 10:35:52 PM
Reply #34

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
XP 64bit is really Windows Server ne way :dunno:

'clams is just a tard who loves to set bait
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

May 06, 2009, 08:49:52 AM
Reply #35

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
XP 64bit is really Windows Server ne way :dunno:

'clams is just a tard who loves to set bait
what part of my post was inaccurate  :confused: :dunno:



Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

May 06, 2009, 09:35:54 AM
Reply #36

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
XP 64bit is really Windows Server ne way :dunno:

'clams is just a tard who loves to set bait
what part of my post was inaccurate  :confused: :dunno:



Quote
you do realize who's fault it is, if my productivity aps are not compatible with anything newer than XP, right?  microsofts.

That would be a good start.

May 06, 2009, 09:48:37 AM
Reply #37

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
XP 64bit is really Windows Server ne way :dunno:

'clams is just a tard who loves to set bait
what part of my post was inaccurate  :confused: :dunno:



Quote
you do realize who's fault it is, if my productivity aps are not compatible with anything newer than XP, right?  microsofts.

That would be a good start.
so you agree that there was a definite need for microsoft to create Vista and in doing so, rebuild the kernel.   :lol: 
i like you ew2x4, you're crazy, but i like you.   :lol:


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

May 06, 2009, 12:38:12 PM
Reply #38

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
XP 64bit is really Windows Server ne way :dunno:

'clams is just a tard who loves to set bait
what part of my post was inaccurate  :confused: :dunno:



Quote
you do realize who's fault it is, if my productivity aps are not compatible with anything newer than XP, right?  microsofts.

That would be a good start.
so you agree that there was a definite need for microsoft to create Vista and in doing so, rebuild the kernel.   :lol: 
i like you ew2x4, you're crazy, but i like you.   :lol:

Why do you think we should have stuck with XP? It's not perfect by any means. Networking is poorly done. You have to use a FLOPPY DISC to install to a SATA drive. Very poor multi-core support. Poor home theater/entertainment options. Can't uninstall windows programs (IE, WMP, etc). It sucks at ending crashing programs. It has awful registry bloat. etc. etc. Would you prefer to get ripped off like MAC OWNERS and pay $150 for "updates" every year or so?

And now I feel bad for  :baityes:

May 06, 2009, 12:39:17 PM
Reply #39

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
I like vista pretty good I guess :dunno:
<---------Click the ball