He's visiting ku this weekend for the spring game. Soft verbal at best.
I am with Wabash, I will not pass judgment completely on this kid until I see his 100 meter time, and his hips.Sniff, sniff . . . I smell Heisman.
Once Mangino and the ku coaching staff show him that since 2004, ku has had 1820 rushing attempts compared to K-State's 1563, he'll go with his #1 choice. Bottom line... this one's not over yet.
Your offensive line in 2009-2010 is going to be pathetic. Thanks for the ancient history lesson, though.
Quote from: BMWJhawk on April 09, 2009, 04:19:36 PMYour offensive line in 2009-2010 is going to be pathetic. Thanks for the ancient history lesson, though.Yeah, comparing stats of a former coach makes more sense. You're boring. Try harder.
So let me get this straight . . . your logic as to why the kid shouldn't come to k-state, is based on what a coach that isn't coaching at k-state anymore did, and K-State's offense line during the recruits senior year in high school and likely his redshirt season. Your idiot logic also dictates that the offensive play calling of K-State's current coach, and his run oriented mindset has no bearing on how he's going to call the game in the future.Wow . . . just wow.To the Bentard . . . So Bentard . . . why is ku's running plays back in 2004 and 2005 relevant, but K-State's running play #'s from 2003, 2004 and 2005 aren't??Damn . . . just damn.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on April 09, 2009, 04:26:15 PMSo let me get this straight . . . your logic as to why the kid shouldn't come to k-state, is based on what a coach that isn't coaching at k-state anymore did, and K-State's offense line during the recruits senior year in high school and likely his redshirt season. Your idiot logic also dictates that the offensive play calling of K-State's current coach, and his run oriented mindset has no bearing on how he's going to call the game in the future.Wow . . . just wow.To the Bentard . . . So Bentard . . . why is ku's running plays back in 2004 and 2005 relevant, but K-State's running play #'s from 2003, 2004 and 2005 aren't??Damn . . . just damn.wut
Quote from: ew2x4 on April 09, 2009, 04:24:43 PMQuote from: BMWJhawk on April 09, 2009, 04:19:36 PMYour offensive line in 2009-2010 is going to be pathetic. Thanks for the ancient history lesson, though.Yeah, comparing stats of a former coach makes more sense. You're boring. Try harder.Am I living in an alternate universe, or is the upcoming football season not 2009-2010?
Thanks for the ancient history lesson, though.
So it's better to go pre-2002, before Mangino was coaching at ku? Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
That would be great. It was just easierfaster to do the last 5 years. Maybe you can do your own research?
Robinson is very underrated back and may be falling under the radar due to his marginal height and overall size. Actually is short but thickly-built and is the type of back that utilizes his low, compact base and center of gravity to his advantage as an in-line runner. Runs very low to the ground with great balance and body control. Displays very good feet and sharp, decisive cutting ability. Picks and darts his way through traffic quickly finding and sliding through the small cutback creases. Rarely gears down when cutting laterally and is the type of back that seems to constantly be going downhill and getting north. Very difficult to get a clean shot on with his good suddenness and sharp redirection skill. Can stop-start and jump-cut very well. Runs through a lot of initial contact with his strong, compact and deceptively powerful lower-body. Keeps his legs driving on contact and is difficult to knock off balance with his low/wide base. However, we do question his ability to retain his current yards after contact at the next level and physical upside appears limited. Actually looks a bit shorter than his listed measurables and while tough, durability in a high carry role is a concern. Shows good downhill burst out of his cuts and can quickly break into the second level but his top-end speed (while good) is hindered at times by his shorter strider. Does not project to be a homerun threat but more of a guy who can rip off consistent bursts of 10-15 yards as a change-of-pace runner at the next level. Overall, Robinson is a very productive, natural runner with the physical tools as well as intangible needed to be an effective zone back at the major college level. The big question mark is whether is can remain a featured load-back. If so, he will be a major steal for the program who signs him.
Quote from: BMWJhawk on April 09, 2009, 03:59:38 PMOnce Mangino and the ku coaching staff show him that since 2004, ku has had 1820 rushing attempts compared to K-State's 1563, he'll go with his #1 choice. Bottom line... this one's not over yet.There's your problem. Focus more on rushing attempts from 1989-2005.
Quote from: BMWJhawk on April 09, 2009, 04:52:06 PMThat would be great. It was just easierfaster to do the last 5 years. Maybe you can do your own research? If you said this instead of looking like a retard for a couple posts, I might be inclined to believe you.
