Author Topic: colorado game (Read 3795 times)

Andy · February 18, 2006, 12:57:22 PM

nice start, i figured we'd start out good but i still think cu wins

who is the new PA guy? is it the guy who does womens basketball?

mjrod · February 18, 2006, 01:22:57 PM

Geezus.

Can this season just get over with so we can get a new coach?

Super PurpleCat · February 18, 2006, 01:40:24 PM

Pervis Pasco is the new PA.

Andy · February 18, 2006, 02:03:58 PM

sweet!

Fausto · February 18, 2006, 02:34:49 PM

Can this season just get over with so we can get a new coach?

I'm already liking my prediction that Wooldridge has a 40% chance of staying. He's making the case right now.

Andy · February 18, 2006, 02:45:36 PM

nice win for any NIT chances. even though i'd like to see a coaching change, it would still be fun to make some sort of postseason.

its too bad this team can't play defense like that every night.

sys · February 18, 2006, 04:47:07 PM

Quote from: ksufan19 on February 18, 2006, 02:45:36 PM

nice win for any NIT chances. even though i'd like to see a coaching change, it would still be fun to make some sort of postseason.

its too bad this team can't play defense like that every night.

no need for the "even though" there is nothing inconsistent in both making the NIT and changing the coaching staff.

opcat · February 18, 2006, 04:54:33 PM

Cartier, Akeem, Diarra showed up today.

Tyler Hughes actually inflicted damage.

Not bad.

What will the opinion be if this team beats UT ?

michigancat · February 18, 2006, 04:56:09 PM

Quote from: opcat on February 18, 2006, 04:54:33 PM

Cartier, Akeem, Diarra showed up today.

Cartier's aggressiveness against CU's zone won the game.

Quote from: opcat on February 18, 2006, 04:54:33 PM

What are fans going to do if this team beats UT ?

Uggh. Talk about fool's gold for the woolites.

kougar24 · February 18, 2006, 04:58:45 PM

I don't think we'll have to worry about the repercussions of beating UT.

michigancat · February 18, 2006, 04:59:42 PM

Quote from: kougar24 on February 18, 2006, 04:58:45 PM

I don't think we'll have to worry about the repercussions of beating UT.

Jim is undefeated vs. UT at home.

UT isn't a very deep team.

I would say we have a better chance of beating UT than ku.

sys · February 18, 2006, 05:03:10 PM

ku's team is fools gold. they are certainly playing better than earlier in the season - but not as good as their big 12 record suggests. they have several weaknesses that ksu could exploit. i'd give ksu about a 50-50 shot at ku and about a 30-70 shot against UT.

fatty fat fat · February 18, 2006, 05:05:00 PM

Quote from: Rusty on February 18, 2006, 04:59:42 PM

Quote from: kougar24 on February 18, 2006, 04:58:45 PM
I don't think we'll have to worry about the repercussions of beating UT.

Jim is undefeated vs. UT at home.

UT isn't a very deep team.

I would say we have a better chance of beating UT than ku.

Incredible logic right there.

UT is tons better than ku.

ku lost to us on their homefloor.

Jesus. Nice to see sys destroyed you tho.

kougar24 · February 18, 2006, 05:05:38 PM

I don't think we'll have to worry about the repercussions of sweeping ku, either.

Super PurpleCat · February 18, 2006, 05:07:09 PM

I think we lose badly to both teams.

kougar24 · February 18, 2006, 05:08:43 PM

I don't. I think we'll make both of them annoyingly close.

fatty fat fat · February 18, 2006, 05:11:50 PM

I see no reason why ku is anything less than a toss-up.

But then again...I AM A TRUE KSU FAN!

EMAW

kougar24 · February 18, 2006, 05:17:59 PM

When did that EMAW crap start, anyway? I forgot.

sys · February 18, 2006, 05:19:12 PM

Quote

Incredible logic right there.

UT is tons better than ku.

ku lost to us on their homefloor.

Jesus. Nice to see sys destroyed you tho.

Quote

fool's gold pretty much blows up any argument. i'm thinking of responding to all posts with just "fool's gold" for the rest of the season.

sys · February 18, 2006, 05:20:04 PM

EMAW is fool's gold.

michigancat · February 18, 2006, 05:32:04 PM

http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=379.0

Also, UT isn't "tons" better than ku.

sys · February 18, 2006, 05:34:59 PM

rusty's link is fool's gold.

michigancat · February 18, 2006, 05:35:08 PM

Quote from: fatty fat fat on February 18, 2006, 05:11:50 PM

I see no reason why ku is anything less than a toss-up.

But then again...I AM A TRUE KSU FAN!

EMAW

Oh, BTW...I have the ku game at 50-50 KSU wins and UT @70-30 KSU wins. I'm more EMAW-er than you.

sys · February 18, 2006, 05:42:31 PM

Quote

Oh, BTW...I have the ku game at 50-50 KSU wins and UT @70-30 KSU wins. I'm more EMAW-er than you.

Quote

fool's gold.

fatty fat fat · February 18, 2006, 05:43:36 PM

Quote from: Rusty on February 18, 2006, 05:35:08 PM

Quote from: fatty fat fat on February 18, 2006, 05:11:50 PM
I see no reason why ku is anything less than a toss-up.

But then again...I AM A TRUE KSU FAN!

EMAW

Oh, BTW...I have the ku game at 50-50 KSU wins and UT @70-30 KSU wins. I'm more EMAW-er than you.

Folks, this is just being foolish.

michigancat · February 18, 2006, 05:46:37 PM

Quote from: fatty fat fat on February 18, 2006, 05:43:36 PM

Quote from: Rusty on February 18, 2006, 05:35:08 PM
Quote from: fatty fat fat on February 18, 2006, 05:11:50 PM
I see no reason why ku is anything less than a toss-up.

But then again...I AM A TRUE KSU FAN!

EMAW

Oh, BTW...I have the ku game at 50-50 KSU wins and UT @70-30 KSU wins. I'm more EMAW-er than you.

Folks, this is just being foolish.

If being a TRUE KSU FAN means I'm foolish, I don't want to be not foolish.

Super PurpleCat · February 18, 2006, 05:47:24 PM

I wish I was eating some Rold Gold.

sys · February 18, 2006, 05:54:58 PM

rold gold + true ksu fan = fool's gold.