Date: 15/08/25 - 13:59 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: OMG GM  (Read 5588 times)

March 09, 2009, 08:08:38 PM
Reply #90

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
And GM or Ford aren't making Hybrid cars at all right now.

 :confused:

http://www.fordvehicles.com/suvs/escapehybrid/

http://www.fordvehicles.com/cars/fusion/models/

Think you might be a little confused lil' guy.  Best to just leave Ford out of this, much better off.

Was sarcasm; read rusty's post that I was replying to;  He tried to make the point that GM isn't taking advantage of the market that prius owns... he wrote it off as, "i wasn't even trying to make a point... blah blah blah... I'm not going to dispute anything you say because you're stupid... blah blah blah. 

They came in waaaaaay too late and really don't offer anything that competes with the Prius.  Comparing their line of hybrid pickups to the Prius is LOLeriffic

1) there's little demand; 2) they don't comply with our Clean Air Act (though oddly they're good enough for Europe), and 3) they don't meet our safety regulations (again oddly they're good enough for Europe) and/or lawyers would destroy manufacturers putting them on the road here. 

there is demand in the us (and canada and mexico).  i don't know what the market would be, but it would certainly be large enough to be worth selling to.

agree that it is ridiculous that ford can't sell some of the best vehicles they make in the us.

Is this why Honda discontinued the Accord Hybrid in 2007?   You guys don't know a fracking thing about the car industry.

They discontinued the Accord Hybrid isn't what people want.  They want smaller and more fuel efficient, like the Civic Hybrid, which they are continuing to sell.

March 09, 2009, 08:27:06 PM
Reply #91

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
Is this why Honda discontinued the Accord Hybrid in 2007?   You guys don't know a fracking thing about the car industry.

 :lol:
"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

March 09, 2009, 10:09:25 PM
Reply #92

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Time and Time again it's been shown that the current ROI on the premium price for Hybrids is absurd . . . they've got a long way to go, but hey, they're "sexy" and make tree hugger types feel good about themselves.

GM is screwed because they should've dropped Pontiac, Saturn, and probaby Buick 5 or 6 years ago.


March 09, 2009, 10:19:46 PM
Reply #93

CatsNChiefs

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2302
And GM or Ford aren't making Hybrid cars at all right now.

 :confused:

http://www.fordvehicles.com/suvs/escapehybrid/

http://www.fordvehicles.com/cars/fusion/models/

Think you might be a little confused lil' guy.  Best to just leave Ford out of this, much better off.

Was sarcasm; read rusty's post that I was replying to;  He tried to make the point that GM isn't taking advantage of the market that prius owns... he wrote it off as, "i wasn't even trying to make a point... blah blah blah... I'm not going to dispute anything you say because you're stupid... blah blah blah. 

They came in waaaaaay too late and really don't offer anything that competes with the Prius.  Comparing their line of hybrid pickups to the Prius is LOLeriffic


 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The fusion is being touted as the best in class hybrid, but please, continue to preach to me about my industry.  Ford's power transition is especially impressive.


March 09, 2009, 10:23:37 PM
Reply #94

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
And GM or Ford aren't making Hybrid cars at all right now.

 :confused:

http://www.fordvehicles.com/suvs/escapehybrid/

http://www.fordvehicles.com/cars/fusion/models/

Think you might be a little confused lil' guy.  Best to just leave Ford out of this, much better off.

Was sarcasm; read rusty's post that I was replying to;  He tried to make the point that GM isn't taking advantage of the market that prius owns... he wrote it off as, "i wasn't even trying to make a point... blah blah blah... I'm not going to dispute anything you say because you're stupid... blah blah blah. 

They came in waaaaaay too late and really don't offer anything that competes with the Prius.  Comparing their line of hybrid pickups to the Prius is LOLeriffic


 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The fusion is being touted as the best in class hybrid, but please, continue to preach to me about my industry.  Ford's power transition is especially impressive.



I was speaking specifically about GM.  But are you going to seriously argue that the Fusion Hybrid didn't come to market about 4 years too late?

March 09, 2009, 10:24:26 PM
Reply #95

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
Hey look; I can make good arguements too:  :lol:
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

March 09, 2009, 10:31:46 PM
Reply #96

Bookcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6459
Ahhh, hybrids.

Are these really going to be better for the environment in the long run? More batteries in landfills and recycling mills. Do we even have the clean technology to handle heavy metal waste? How long do the batteries last? And can I really just plug my car into a large socket in my garage (if I have a garage).

Seems like people throw around the hybrid word as if that is the new business model all auto manufacturers should abide by.
"You guys want answers that are conversations between John and I. I ain't worried about it. I'm living the dream.... When I start worrying about a contract, I'd be cheating the kids and not doing my job." - Frank Martin

March 09, 2009, 10:34:20 PM
Reply #97

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
You must be new to america; Hybrids are all that dood.   But not those crapty GM hybrids that actually get 38 MPG when they say 38 MPG.... but those trendy awesome Hybrids that get 38 mpg, but everyone thinks they get 55 mpg so you can look like you really care about the environment. ya know?
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

March 10, 2009, 06:33:54 AM
Reply #98

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
You must be new to america; Hybrids are all that dood.   But not those crapty GM hybrids that actually get 38 MPG when they say 38 MPG.... but those trendy awesome Hybrids that get 38 mpg, but everyone thinks they get 55 mpg so you can look like you really care about the environment. ya know?

An attitude similar to this is why GM is on the verge of going out of business.

March 10, 2009, 10:11:01 AM
Reply #99

Bookcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6459
You must be new to america; Hybrids are all that dood.   But not those crapty GM hybrids that actually get 38 MPG when they say 38 MPG.... but those trendy awesome Hybrids that get 38 mpg, but everyone thinks they get 55 mpg so you can look like you really care about the environment. ya know?

An attitude similar to this is why GM is on the verge of going out of business.

qft.

I think hybrids will descrease our need for oil to commuter transportation...but, yeah, but I think people are looking at them as an alternative to $4.00 a gallon gas which will inevitably return once the economy improves.

FBWillies post illustrates that not only does GM not have a clue about their business model...but their marketing and design strategy sucks too. Everything from the GM logo to their annoying commericals screams "don't buy me".
"You guys want answers that are conversations between John and I. I ain't worried about it. I'm living the dream.... When I start worrying about a contract, I'd be cheating the kids and not doing my job." - Frank Martin

March 10, 2009, 11:23:30 AM
Reply #100

CatsNChiefs

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2302
I was speaking specifically about GM.  But are you going to seriously argue that the Fusion Hybrid didn't come to market about 4 years too late?

It was a lot cheaper to license hybrid tech from toyota and engineer a better system from there, than to incur the R&D costs of the first mover.  Have a look at the returns, Toyota would have been SOL if it weren't for the interesting psychosis that some americans have been afflicted by recently in regards to hybrids.

March 10, 2009, 11:30:15 AM
Reply #101

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
You must be new to america; Hybrids are all that dood.   But not those crapty GM hybrids that actually get 38 MPG when they say 38 MPG.... but those trendy awesome Hybrids that get 38 mpg, but everyone thinks they get 55 mpg so you can look like you really care about the environment. ya know?

An attitude similar to this is why GM is on the verge of going out of business.

So according to you: GM's biggest problem is that they didn't lie to a significant enough degree about the fuel efficiency of their vehicles.  Got it. 
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem

March 10, 2009, 12:32:22 PM
Reply #102

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
Just a quick poll... how many of you have worked in the car business at all and dealt on a daily basis with what consumers "say" they want in a vehicle.
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

March 10, 2009, 12:36:40 PM
Reply #103

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Just a quick poll... how many of you have worked in the car business at all and dealt on a daily basis with what consumers "say" they want in a vehicle.


I've actually worked for an auto dealer (Ford) before, but I'm looking at what people are actually buying rather than using your method of relying on your experience ripping people off at a POS Saturn dealership.

March 10, 2009, 05:34:42 PM
Reply #104

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
Just a quick poll... how many of you have worked in the car business at all and dealt on a daily basis with what consumers "say" they want in a vehicle.


I've actually worked for an auto dealer (Ford) before, but I'm looking at what people are actually buying rather than using your method of relying on your experience ripping people off at a POS Saturn dealership.

I didn't see you post any links, so I won't consider your opinion any higher than anyone elses.  Although as a lot boy, I imagine you got to wash every purchase that walked off the lot.  But what the hell do I know, I just called & surveyed the &@#%ing people for 3 years.

I wouldn't consider it ripping people off when their sales person ask them what's important to them in their next vehicle and the top first 3 things they say are always: "Fuel economy" "Price" & "Comfort"  but after they drive the low priced economic car, they always say: "This doesn't have much power" "The stereo sucks" &  "How much is that SUV?" 

You honestly want to know what I think killed all car business?   Zero percent & 100,000 mile warranties.  People have absolutely no reason to buy a car every 4-5 years.   15 years ago, it was an oddity for a person to finance a car any longer than 36 months with 10 percent down; 60 terms was as long as it got.   Now you have people financing cars for 7 years AND you can do it all with little cash down.  20 years ago, people got nervous as their car got over 50K miles because it was likely something was going to go wrong and it was paid off & they weren't upsidedown after 3-4 years. Much easier to talk someone into trading when it's not painfully obvious how much $$ their losing and it seems like $$ on the bank when you remind them how much it cost to replace these new fangled computers when they go out.

When KIA & Hyundai made 100,000 drivetrain warranties standard, everyone was busting their nuts trying to match it.   It didn't matter that the warranty was non-transferable & voided if you didn't service it at the dealer.  Customers are uneducated & think 100,000 miles is 100,000 miles; and you're 36K warranty sucks.


About 5-6 years ago, car buyers saw something monumental.   GM had Zero percent AND a warrenty for the next 5 years or 60,000 miles FREE.   EVERYONE that was going to be in the market for a car within 3 years bought a car from 03-05.    Market was damn near dry by the time 06 models hit the lots.   People that were car buyers had already bought & were upside down in their car by approximately $5 - $10K.   But they didn't give a crap because they were still under warranty.   Not to mention that if they weren't tipped in their car, it was tough to justify to them financing a car for another 5 years for the same or higher payment to buy a car that's only a couple years newer than what they already have & trust.  Not an easy sell.

So, you have people not buying new vehicles... but you also have people not trading vehicles.  No used car buyer likes to hear that the used car they're about to buy is a lease vehicle or an old rental and I'd wager that 60% of the cars on used lots right now are just that.   

People will be ready to buy cars again beginning in 2010...   If financing is available... HA.

The best thing that could happen is to only approve zero percent for "A" tier buyers...  those people never buy cars every 3 years anyway.
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

March 11, 2009, 12:01:33 PM
Reply #105

CatsNChiefs

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2302
« Last Edit: March 11, 2009, 12:03:48 PM by CatsNChiefs »

April 16, 2009, 06:44:43 PM
Reply #106

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

April 16, 2009, 11:14:13 PM
Reply #107

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
I guess no one has any money to purchase failing car companies... right?


http://www.easycarblog.com/2009/04/telesto-ventures-are-looking-to-buy-saturn-and-re-sell-cars-overseas.html/

They aren't even buying a whole subsidiary.  They are just buying the retail of one subsidiary.  Their entire plan rests on the assumption that GM stays afloat.

You fail.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

April 17, 2009, 08:04:10 PM
Reply #108

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
They would have controlling interest in a branch of GM; but not really my point.  My point was more that there's $$ out there and there is interest in failing car companies.   
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

April 18, 2009, 11:00:50 AM
Reply #109

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
They would have controlling interest in a branch of GM; but not really my point.  My point was more that there's $$ out there and there is interest in failing car companies.   

Go back and read the article.  They are hoping to buy up the RETAILERS and still have GM handle the PRODUCTION.

That is not real $$ and that is not the kind of interest that will save any of them.

ksufanscopycat my friends.

April 27, 2009, 09:05:23 AM
Reply #110

Bookcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6459
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/27/news/companies/gm_announcement/index.htm


stocks up 11%.

The Unions finally gave in...a little. Guess they are figuring out that their strangle on the company they work for still writes their paycheck.

One of the concessions.....that they pay LESS for a health care fund for retired auto workers. Yeah....not that they won't be paying at all.....just LESS for a lifetime health care plan for employees that no longer work for them.

LOL! Man they must have it rough.  :rolleyes:
"You guys want answers that are conversations between John and I. I ain't worried about it. I'm living the dream.... When I start worrying about a contract, I'd be cheating the kids and not doing my job." - Frank Martin

April 27, 2009, 09:27:20 AM
Reply #111

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Hey . . . now they finally get around to dumping Pontiac . . . and talking about tossing Hummer, SAAB, Saturn.


April 27, 2009, 10:03:09 AM
Reply #112

ArchE_Cat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1117
  • Personal Text
    ksufanscopycat
Hey . . . now they finally get around to dumping Pontiac . . . and talking about tossing Hummer, SAAB, Saturn.

This could be a good thing for the company. I have always felt they were spread too thin across too many brands, some of which were pretty gimmicky (see Hummer). SAAB was way better before GM got involved (1990). The only products worth buying from GM were GMC, Cadillac and maybe (big maybe) some Buick. Pontiac models were always a cheapened version of one of the better brands, so was some of the Chevy and Saturn stuff. Perhaps now they will stop with this "value engineered" crap models for the brands they are cutting and get serious about making good vehicles.

May 27, 2009, 12:56:11 PM
Reply #113

Bookcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6459

GM bankruptcy expected as bondholder offer fails

Few took the company up on its bond-exchange offer, making bankruptcy very likely within the next week. The government could receive as much as a 70% stake in the company.
By Jim Puzzanghera
6:01 AM PDT, May 27, 2009
Reporting from Washington -- General Motors Corp. announced today that its offer to bondholders to exchange their debt for equity in the company had ended with "substantially less" participation than required by the Obama administration, likely guaranteeing a bankruptcy filing for the legendary automaker within the next week.

The bond-exchange offer ended at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time Tuesday and failed to reach the 90% participation required, GM said. GM had offered to swap 225 shares for every $1,000 in bonds, a deal many bondholders publicly criticized. Under the plan, announced in April, bondholders would get 10% equity in a restructured GM in exchange for $24 billion in debt, a much less generous deal than the government and the United Auto Workers union would receive for their debt.

The federal government stands to receive a majority stake -- as much as 70% equity -- in exchange for the $19.4 billion it has already loaned to GM and probably tens of billions of dollars more in financing to get the company through bankruptcy. The UAW would get 17.5% and warrants for another 2.5% in exchange for part of the debt owed by GM to its retiree healthcare trust.

The Obama administration's deadline for GM to restructure is June 1, and a source familiar with the negotiations said Tuesday a bankruptcy filing was looking increasingly likely.

GM said in a statement today that no new offers would be extended to the bondholders.

"Since these conditions, as well as certain other conditions, have not been satisfied, the exchange offers will not be consummated," GM said. "The GM board of directors will be meeting to discuss GM's next steps in light of the expiration of the exchange offers."
"You guys want answers that are conversations between John and I. I ain't worried about it. I'm living the dream.... When I start worrying about a contract, I'd be cheating the kids and not doing my job." - Frank Martin