well, they've obviously recruited better than that.
I don't know that it's obvious. What was Boise State's recruiting rankings when they beat OU?
There is a hell of a lot more to fielding a competitive football team than recruiting. This site is like a broken record sometimes.
coaches win because they can do 2 things:
1 - recruit (includes player evaluation) players
2 - develop players
the ones that can do both are great coaches. star rankings are irrelevant (though it's fun to make fun of the 2* nobodies and get excited for the 4* somebodies). pointing out the 4and 5* busts that KSU has had is not a good way to say "hey you can't trust rivals rankings" it's probably a better way to say "hey your coaches either can't evaluate or can't develop players" because regardless of the guy's star ranking our coaches gave him a scholarship and he turned out to be sh*t.
KSU fielded outstanding teams that didn't have "highly" rated recruiting classes, but it wasn't because they weren't good players and magically Bill coached'em up, it was because Bill had assistants that were good evaluators of talent
and could develop players. those coaches are currently in norman and lawrence and south florida.