freems gone

[Thebalo]

Who's throwing anyone under the bus.  I made no opinion on the matter.

Whom's.

Wow, nothing like pointing out a grammar mistake... and being the one that's wrong...

Naw, pretty sure it's whom's.

Might be Qwhom's now that I think of it, with a silent "Q" even...

[fatty fat fat]

  on you golden boy

 

qft. stop defending freeman you fracks.

[McGrowlTowelZac]

I hope to God your next quarterback is as awesome as Freeman. 

 

Freems has talent.  You really can't argue that.  The NFL places more value on Freems than they do on Reesing, for example.  However, Reesing played in a system that was vastly superior to Freems. 

As a quarterback Freeman sucked d*ck in college, not sure how that translates to NFL talent.

But if talent means 6'6", dude had it in spades. 

I know you know all about sucking d*ck, but Freeman really didn't in college.  Look back at ku's QB's before Reesing, those guys knew sucking d*ck all too well.

[KansasForever]

Who's throwing anyone under the bus.  I made no opinion on the matter.

Whom's.

Wow, nothing like pointing out a grammar mistake... and being the one that's wrong...

Naw, pretty sure it's whom's.

Who = subject
Whom = object

Verbs can only conjugate with subjects, hence "whom's" (whom is) does not compute in the English language.

The original statement (who's) is the correct one.     

[cireksu]

Who's throwing anyone under the bus.  I made no opinion on the matter.

Whom's.

Wow, nothing like pointing out a grammar mistake... and being the one that's wrong...

Naw, pretty sure it's whom's.

Who = subject
Whom = object

Verbs can only conjugate with subjects, hence "whom's" (whom is) does not compute in the English language.

The original statement (who's) is the correct one.     

ahhhhhh

[KansasForever]

I hope to God your next quarterback is as awesome as Freeman. 

 

Freems has talent.  You really can't argue that.  The NFL places more value on Freems than they do on Reesing, for example.  However, Reesing played in a system that was vastly superior to Freems. 

As a quarterback Freeman sucked d*ck in college, not sure how that translates to NFL talent.

But if talent means 6'6", dude had it in spades. 

I know you know all about sucking d*ck, but Freeman really didn't in college.  Look back at ku's QB's before Reesing, those guys knew sucking d*ck all too well.

Josh Freeman = black Brian Luke 

[PoetWarrior]

Damn poet, I used to like you... but how could you?   Friends with fitz..... really?

I think he meant Terry.  Pretty sure Fitz and Poet still hate each other.

Nope, Fitz.

We're like this 

Terry and I will have our differences to work out over time.

But love can overcome all.

[Winters]

I wish the best to freems!

[PoetWarrior]

Pretty sure if you look through the archives you will in fact discover that I am much less gay than most ksufans

probably true.  but, i'm not talking about moldy archived records, i'm talking about clean, aristocratic, boston brahminy pete carroll.

I suppose the appropriate reply to this would be, "Not my type."

[PoetWarrior]

Selfish, poor decisions hurt Kansas State.

I think we can all agree on that.

Of course, lets ignore what he did for us and only think about what MORE he should have done for the team... wait, that would be selfish, now I'm confused...  

Fitz fan?

You must not have heard we're good friends now.

Naturally, pull the Fitz reference like 90% of other people with nothing to say...

But nope, didn't hear that, but I'd be more apt to believe it if I heard it from him.

Just recall you being Tardy. Could be mistaken.

Fitzzers stick together.

[fatty fat fat]

stop taking pw so damned seriously you frackers.

[KansasForever]

Ron Prince and his apprentice Josh Freeman plotting the final destruction of K-State football:

[Thebalo]

Selfish, poor decisions hurt Kansas State.

I think we can all agree on that.

Of course, lets ignore what he did for us and only think about what MORE he should have done for the team... wait, that would be selfish, now I'm confused...  

Fitz fan?

You must not have heard we're good friends now.

Naturally, pull the Fitz reference like 90% of other people with nothing to say...

But nope, didn't hear that, but I'd be more apt to believe it if I heard it from him.

Just recall you being Tardy. Could be mistaken.

Fitzzers stick together.

Right, again, the answer given by morons who have nothing to say, "well, you listen to fitz".

Amazing how I point out that you have nothing to say, and you just prove it again.

You were there once too, as was a lot of this board.

The least you could do is try...

[PoetWarrior]

Right, again, the answer given by morons who have nothing to say, "well, you listen to fitz".

Amazing how I point out that you have nothing to say, and you just prove it again.

You were there once too, as was a lot of this board.

The least you could do is try...

You tell me what you want me to try and do and I'll try and do it...

[McGrowlTowelZac]

Ron Prince and his apprentice Josh Freeman plotting the final destruction of K-State football:

star wars

[catdude33]

Who's throwing anyone under the bus.  I made no opinion on the matter.

Whom's.

Wow, nothing like pointing out a grammar mistake... and being the one that's wrong...

Naw, pretty sure it's whom's.

Who = subject
Whom = object

Verbs can only conjugate with subjects, hence "whom's" (whom is) does not compute in the English language.

The original statement (who's) is the correct one.     

Whose.   

[KansasForever]

Who's throwing anyone under the bus.  I made no opinion on the matter.

Whom's.

Wow, nothing like pointing out a grammar mistake... and being the one that's wrong...

Naw, pretty sure it's whom's.

Who = subject
Whom = object

Verbs can only conjugate with subjects, hence "whom's" (whom is) does not compute in the English language.

The original statement (who's) is the correct one.     

Whose.   

Nope, "whose" is a possessive pronoun.  It needs to possess something.  Like another noun. 

[Thebalo]

Right, again, the answer given by morons who have nothing to say, "well, you listen to fitz".

Amazing how I point out that you have nothing to say, and you just prove it again.

You were there once too, as was a lot of this board.

The least you could do is try...

If I have to tell you, it's a lot less fun.

But go ahead and ignore that you once too posted "there", now how is that different from me?  Because you were banned and I chose to leave because it sucked?  Thats the only difference I see, but POOF, I'm with Fitzy... genius 
You tell me what you want me to try and do and I'll try and do it...

[Thebalo]

As in, "Whose cup is this?"

[SCHITZ]

i have a secret insider source who received an email that said that Snyder personally cleaned out Freeman's locker.  Freems wanted to stay but Bill said he was a worthless mother fracker and Bill needed his jersey number for this guy.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYQxcFJowas  Freem's offered to switch #'s but Bill told him to frack off after calling freems a fracking pussy.  Bill = 

 

[Legore]

you people are f'ing idiots.  If the defense got as better, year from year, as Josh did from his freshman year, we'd be playing today.  completely f'ing idiots.  It's tough to "lead" a team when the OL sucks complete donkey d*ck, you have no running back, and your defense has the resistancy of air. 
Michael Bishop was a "leader" because he had an NFL line in front of him, an NFL-caliber wide reciever, an NFL caliber RB, and a defense that was littered with NFL players.  Same for J. Beasley and E. Roberson.  f'ing idiots.  I mean, do you think D. Meier's problem was that he didn't have "fire"?  No, he had zero talent and so did the team around him.  Same for AE.  They had no talent, Josh does it's just a shame that no one else on the team does/did. 

When did Josh make these great improvements?  His best record as a starter was his first season.  The best game I ever saw him play was his freshman year at CU when he was darn near perfect.  I think the only game winning TD drive he ever had and the only really memorable big play he ever had was in his career first start vs. OSU.  

Josh has talent but  honestly I don't think he developed much at all during his career.  Sure he learned the offense better and learned to read defenses better but he never really learned to lead and never learned to win.  If anything he got worse as his career went along because the losses and turnovers got in his head and he was thinking too much, he was best his first year when he just went out and played.  ku fans will love this but I don't think he was ever the same after the game in Lawrence his freshman year when he turned it over like 6 times or whatever it was.  From that game on Josh kind of froze in the bigger games and was turnover prone.   The same kind of thing happened to Chase Daniel this year he was never the same after the loss to Okie State.  

[PoetWarrior]

If I have to tell you, it's a lot less fun.

But go ahead and ignore that you once too posted "there", now how is that different from me?  Because you were banned and I chose to leave because it sucked?  Thats the only difference I see, but POOF, I'm with Fitzy... genius 

Yes, I posted on gopowercat. And loved every second of it.

Anything else?

Let's be friends. OK?

[Thebalo]

If I have to tell you, it's a lot less fun.

But go ahead and ignore that you once too posted "there", now how is that different from me?  Because you were banned and I chose to leave because it sucked?  Thats the only difference I see, but POOF, I'm with Fitzy... genius 

Yes, I posted on gopowercat. And loved every second of it.

Anything else?

Let's be friends. OK?

Man, you are abrasive, lol.

My point is, it's stupid for people here to bash on other people for posting there, because 90% of us did it...  and we're all morons.

[KansasForever]

As in, "Whose cup is this?"

Yep.

[PoetWarrior]

Somehow we got off topic.

 

[catzacker]

you people are f'ing idiots.  If the defense got as better, year from year, as Josh did from his freshman year, we'd be playing today.  completely f'ing idiots.  It's tough to "lead" a team when the OL sucks complete donkey d*ck, you have no running back, and your defense has the resistancy of air. 
Michael Bishop was a "leader" because he had an NFL line in front of him, an NFL-caliber wide reciever, an NFL caliber RB, and a defense that was littered with NFL players.  Same for J. Beasley and E. Roberson.  f'ing idiots.  I mean, do you think D. Meier's problem was that he didn't have "fire"?  No, he had zero talent and so did the team around him.  Same for AE.  They had no talent, Josh does it's just a shame that no one else on the team does/did. 

When did Josh make these great improvements?  His best record as a starter was his first season.  The best game I ever saw him play was his freshman year at CU when he was darn near perfect.  I think the only game winning TD drive he ever had and the only really memorable big play he ever had was in his career first start vs. OSU.  

Josh has talent but  honestly I don't think he developed much at all during his career.  Sure he learned the offense better and learned to read defenses better but he never really learned to lead and never learned to win.  If anything he got worse as his career went along because the losses and turnovers got in his head and he was thinking too much, he was best his first year when he just went out and played.  ku fans will love this but I don't think he was ever the same after the game in Lawrence his freshman year when he turned it over like 6 times or whatever it was.  From that game on Josh kind of froze in the bigger games and was turnover prone.   The same kind of thing happened to Chase Daniel this year he was never the same after the loss to Okie State.  

were you even paying attention?  he couldn't play every goddamn position.  was he perfect?  no, but he made improvements, no one else did.


        Eff     Comp %  Yds     ypg   TD/INT   Ru TD
2006   103.5   52%  1780   161.8   6/15     2
2007   127.3   63%  3353   279.4   18/11      4
2008   136.5   59%  2945   245.4   20/8    14

[catdude33]

This thread is over. 

[Thebalo]

Somehow we got off topic.

 

Agreed, let me reset it...

PW thinks Freeman will fail in the NFL and compares what Freeman will do to what TP did.

There, back to how it was.

[PoetWarrior]

Somehow we got off topic.

 

Agreed, let me reset it...

PW thinks Freeman will fail in the NFL and compares what Freeman will do to what TP did.

There, back to how it was.

100% incorrect.

lol (< correct?)

[Purplefamily]

The difference is Josh will have a long, successful NFL career.

What would make you think that? He didn't have an especially successful college career.  Taking those same "skills" to the NFL may result in a short stay... unless there's a pro team that somehow needs a QB who's big, strong, panicky, fumble & interception-prone, has no "command presence", and poor on-field decision-making.