Reminds me of the Oregon Game when we needed 3 and Whats his nuts

[jaa1025]

drove for 2.

[Legore]

reminds me of about half the games in the Wooly era.  Seemed we always had the ball at the end with a chance to win or tie and rarely ever even got a shot up. 

[opcat]

right. now that wool is gone we should never lose a close game.

[fatty fat fat]

right. now that wool is gone we should never lose a close game.

wow. good post op.

[ksufanatic7]

We still scrapped our way to a lot of clutch baskets to even get ourselves to that point.

[bam8485]

drove for 2.

 I was thinking the exact same thing when that happened. It just leaves you confused on what they are thinking out there.

[Skydog]

drove for 2.

I fail to see the similarity.

[michigancat]

penetrate and kickouts are possibly the best way to get open 3's in end-of-game situations.

[jmlynch1]

penetrate and kickouts are possibly the best way to get open 3's in end-of-game situations.

More of a factor when you are down 2 though. Defense doesn't have to respect any drives to the hoop in that situation.

[sys]

More of a factor when you are down 2 though. Defense doesn't have to respect any drives to the hoop in that situation.

they tend to do so anyways.  instinct overrides game situation (2006-2007 ut game hoskins to martin).  plus with 8-9 seconds like last night, plenty of time to get 2 and foul.

[michigancat]

More of a factor when you are down 2 though. Defense doesn't have to respect any drives to the hoop in that situation.

they tend to do so anyways.  instinct overrides game situation (2006-2007 ut game hoskins to martin).  plus with 8-9 seconds like last night, plenty of time to get 2 and foul.

Yeah.  I was drinking bourbon, but I'm pretty sure sutton was sucking people into the lane.

[Trim]

plus with 8-9 seconds like last night, plenty of time to get 2 and foul.

Frank said on postgame this would be fine if a step-in 3 didn't open up.