Date: 16/08/25 - 03:54 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: How many of you think the 'Cats will hold uk under 42 points?  (Read 981 times)

October 28, 2008, 11:08:24 PM
Read 981 times

Bookie Pimp

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1584

October 28, 2008, 11:14:08 PM
Reply #1

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
Not I.

There is talk of ku trying to do a 64-0 replay from 2002 against us.

 :ohno:

October 28, 2008, 11:14:21 PM
Reply #2

JR Ewing

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 577
Once you get past the ethics, the rest is easy.

October 28, 2008, 11:15:24 PM
Reply #3

Bookie Pimp

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1584
Not I.

There is talk of ku trying to do a 64-0 replay from 2002 against us.

 :ohno:


I think they can score 64... But, I think they'll give up 30ish to have time to do it.

 :yuck:

October 28, 2008, 11:20:05 PM
Reply #4

Bullfn33

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2152
i think 41 so sure, I guess, but not real confident
Show me defense.

October 28, 2008, 11:22:20 PM
Reply #5

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
Not I.

There is talk of ku trying to do a 64-0 replay from 2002 against us.

 :ohno:


I think they can score 64... But, I think they'll give up 30ish to have time to do it.

 :yuck:

You don't understand.   The Squawk I know here in Phoenix has said that Mangino was told by a number of influential people to make K-State pay like K-State did in 2002 to ku.   Many see this as ku's best opportunity to exact revenge on us.

If I were ku, I'd take advantage of that right now.

October 28, 2008, 11:27:55 PM
Reply #6

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
I do not think that the Khattz will hold ku under 42


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

October 28, 2008, 11:29:03 PM
Reply #7

JTKSU

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 7178
  • Personal Text
    Gettin' angried up!!!
Discuss.

 :popcorn:

We probably have a better chance of keeping their basketball team under 42 points this year.

October 28, 2008, 11:41:33 PM
Reply #8

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
The Squawk I know here in Phoenix has said that Mangino was told by a number of influential people to make K-State pay like K-State did in 2002 to ku.   Many see this as ku's best opportunity to exact revenge on us.

 We've got 'em right where we want 'em.  :pray:
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem

October 28, 2008, 11:43:59 PM
Reply #9

Xbring_on_the_catsX

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 182
  • Personal Text
    EMAW, ECAWM
The Squawk I know here in Phoenix has said that Mangino was told by a number of influential people to make K-State pay like K-State did in 2002 to ku.   Many see this as ku's best opportunity to exact revenge on us.

 We've got 'em right where we want 'em.  :pray:

 :lol:

October 29, 2008, 01:18:47 AM
Reply #10

JR Ewing

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 577
Not I.

There is talk of ku trying to do a 64-0 replay from 2002 against us.

 :ohno:


I think they can score 64... But, I think they'll give up 30ish to have time to do it.

 :yuck:

You don't understand.   The Squawk I know here in Phoenix has said that Mangino was told by a number of influential people to make K-State pay like K-State did in 2002 to ku.   Many see this as ku's best opportunity to exact revenge on us.

If I were ku, I'd take advantage of that right now.


And Mangino said, "And drive out the coach that I can pwn on the field and in recruiting?  Why, I'd rather drink turpentine and piss on a therapeutic hay fire."
Once you get past the ethics, the rest is easy.

October 29, 2008, 06:29:09 AM
Reply #11

cireksu

  • Guest
Not I.

There is talk of ku trying to do a 64-0 replay from 2002 against us.

 :ohno:


I think they can score 64... But, I think they'll give up 30ish to have time to do it.

 :yuck:

You don't understand.   The Squawk I know here in Phoenix has said that Mangino was told by a number of influential people to make K-State pay like K-State did in 2002 to ku.   Many see this as ku's best opportunity to exact revenge on us.

If I were ku, I'd take advantage of that right now.


Oh I believe that without a doubt, they have the offense to do it running game or not.  I've said it before this will be the NU game all over again.

October 29, 2008, 08:26:50 AM
Reply #12

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
If ku can't score 42 plus on our defense, than it will just reaffirm Smoke and Mirrors 2007.


October 29, 2008, 08:40:58 AM
Reply #13

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
I'll just say I think we need to score in the 40s to win.

October 29, 2008, 09:00:43 AM
Reply #14

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
KSU is bad, but they aren't 64-0 bad and ku isn't 64-0 good.

45-21 or so seems very likely.

October 29, 2008, 09:02:44 AM
Reply #15

cireksu

  • Guest
KSU is bad, but they aren't 64-0 bad and ku isn't 64-0 good.

45-21 or so seems very likely.

was ku 39-20 good 2 years ago?  Were we that bad?

was NU 76-35 or whatever it was good last year?

we are still that bad and they aren't worse than NU last year.

This is their superbowl once again knowing that MU will crap can them

October 29, 2008, 09:04:40 AM
Reply #16

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
KSU is bad, but they aren't 64-0 bad and ku isn't 64-0 good.

45-21 or so seems very likely.

Yeah.  

And the comparisons to Toilet Bowl 87 are ridic.  The offenses are WAY better than either team saw in the 80s.  Defenses may be close to as bad, but way more athletes now.

I think the teams will both score in the 30s.  It will come down to TOs and who can get the biggest special teams plays IMO.  Both offenses will score 4 to 5 TDs min. unless one of them has a horrible day.  These are two pretty bad defenses.

October 29, 2008, 09:05:12 AM
Reply #17

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
KSU is bad, but they aren't 64-0 bad and ku isn't 64-0 good.

45-21 or so seems very likely.

was ku 39-20 good 2 years ago?  Were we that bad?

was NU 76-35 or whatever it was good last year?

Yes and kind of.

October 29, 2008, 09:05:42 AM
Reply #18

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Although it would be kind of a nice nail in Prince's coffin if we got 64-0'd.

October 29, 2008, 09:16:16 AM
Reply #19

cireksu

  • Guest
Although it would be kind of a nice nail in Prince's coffin if we got 64-0'd.

exactly

October 29, 2008, 09:23:29 AM
Reply #20

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
KSU is bad, but they aren't 64-0 bad and ku isn't 64-0 good.

45-21 or so seems very likely.


They want to score 64 in the first half.  That's how badly they want to dominate us.  Watching the OU tape has them licking their chops..

 :lick:




October 29, 2008, 09:32:31 AM
Reply #21

WC4Ever

  • Guest
I don't think we've EVER beaten the chickenhawks when they score 28 points.

Sure would be nice to break that streak. 

That's one thing Prince is good at...breaking streaks....

October 29, 2008, 09:48:04 AM
Reply #22

LimestoneOutcropping

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6938
  • Personal Text
    Skate on Sister School
KSU is bad, but they aren't 64-0 bad and ku isn't 64-0 good.

45-21 or so seems very likely.


They want to score 64 in the first half.  That's how badly they want to dominate us.  Watching the OU tape has them licking their chops..

 :lick:





Sharp is licking something else while watching that tape but he is definitely thrilled that our LB's seem to be completely unable to beat anyone to the edge.

October 29, 2008, 09:50:50 AM
Reply #23

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
Don't be surprised if the squawks put up 70 against us.

 :runaway:

October 29, 2008, 09:57:44 AM
Reply #24

Expecting the Worst

  • Guest

October 29, 2008, 09:59:38 AM
Reply #25

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
For the first time in history I will only be a little perturbed and even slightly  :lol: if they do put up 70 on us.

I can also see the Weefer tearing all up when talking about how mean people where in their emails, calls and letters and how they just don't understand the Kingdom of the Binder.


October 29, 2008, 10:02:19 AM
Reply #26

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
I think we average scoring about 26ppg on the road (and that is including special teams scores) under Prince.  I think we might score about 28, maybe in the 30's if we get a special teams score.  ku should probably win by 10-14 points.

October 29, 2008, 10:11:04 AM
Reply #27

WC4Ever

  • Guest
We have the worst Defense in football...

I don't think we will keep ku under 42.   Maybe we should play prevent from the beginning of the game and give them 8-12 yard running plays per snap, and hope they fumble or screw up along the way...

Go ahead and play the 3-4 with our 250 lb DE's and lightweight NT and put 8 Princely-fast DB's on the field to cover the pass....yeah, that's the ticket

October 29, 2008, 10:18:54 AM
Reply #28

LimestoneOutcropping

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6938
  • Personal Text
    Skate on Sister School
We have the worst Defense in football...

I don't think we will keep ku under 42.   Maybe we should play prevent from the beginning of the game and give them 8-12 yard running plays per snap, and hope they fumble or screw up along the way...

Go ahead and play the 3-4 with our 250 lb DE's and lightweight NT and put 8 Princely-fast DB's on the field to cover the pass....yeah, that's the ticket

 :lol:

October 29, 2008, 10:30:33 AM
Reply #29

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem