Reason Lehman was allowed to fail.

[opcat]

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1456557-lehman-weber

[pissclams]

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1456557-lehman-weber

that's not the reason. 

**bad reason given in article, pls don't read or click on link.**

[frankencat]

It was allowed to fail for political reasons ( stupid administration bowed  to public sentiment for the first time and public doesn't understand financing) so credit markets get bound up like a fat man who's eaten 10# of cheese

[opcat]

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1456557-lehman-weber

that's not the reason. 

**bad reason given in article, pls don't read or click on link.**

Why then?

[pissclams]

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1456557-lehman-weber

that's not the reason. 

**bad reason given in article, pls don't read or click on link.**

Why then?

I think they let it fall because bailing them out  of their current situation would do nothing to help the company's longterm sustainability.  They aren't worth anything and deserve to fail.

[AzCat]

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1456557-lehman-weber

that's not the reason. 

**bad reason given in article, pls don't read or click on link.**

Why then?

I think they let it fall because bailing them out  of their current situation would do nothing to help the company's longterm sustainability.  They aren't worth anything and deserve to fail.

Sort of like GM and Ford and ... Chrysler.  Oh wait ....   

[pissclams]

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1456557-lehman-weber

that's not the reason. 

**bad reason given in article, pls don't read or click on link.**

Why then?

I think they let it fall because bailing them out  of their current situation would do nothing to help the company's longterm sustainability.  They aren't worth anything and deserve to fail.

Sort of like GM and Ford and ... Chrysler.  Oh wait ....   

you're right, they're the same thing except they're not so it's completely different.

[opcat]

I could see Bush not wanting to bail them out because of the commy connection.

Very plausible.

[Pete]

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1456557-lehman-weber

that's not the reason. 

**bad reason given in article, pls don't read or click on link.**

Why then?

I think they let it fall because bailing them out  of their current situation would do nothing to help the company's longterm sustainability.  They aren't worth anything and deserve to fail.

Sort of like GM and Ford and ... Chrysler.  Oh wait ....   

you're right, they're the same thing except they're not so it's completely different.

Pull the &@#%ing plug on those dinosaurs.  I hope we never give them a cent.

[AzCat]

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/1456557-lehman-weber

that's not the reason. 

**bad reason given in article, pls don't read or click on link.**

Why then?

I think they let it fall because bailing them out  of their current situation would do nothing to help the company's longterm sustainability.  They aren't worth anything and deserve to fail.

Sort of like GM and Ford and ... Chrysler.  Oh wait ....   

you're right, they're the same thing except they're not so it's completely different.

Pull the fracking plug on those dinosaurs.  I hope we never give them a cent.

You mean other than the, what was it $35,000,000,000, stuffed into the bailout bill?