Date: 19/08/25 - 08:45 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Toledo at Iowa State  (Read 888 times)

August 31, 2006, 10:21:26 PM
Read 888 times

Beijing Cat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 216
Looks like Toledo is finding some holes in the ISU D. Certainly seems like Toledo didn't lay down after 3 Quarters as predicted.

August 31, 2006, 10:28:28 PM
Reply #1

Beijing Cat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 216
Hold on Clone fans this one's gonna be close...........

August 31, 2006, 10:48:23 PM
Reply #2

Andy

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1506
  • Personal Text
    KSU '06 Alum
45-43 Iowa St. in 3OT's

good lord

gonna be a heartattack season for ISU fans
reminds me of the 2002 chiefs

August 31, 2006, 10:53:52 PM
Reply #3

Beijing Cat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 216
Stat's make Conchran look like a "playa" but pub before the game was confusing. Seem like he has a fav target in the Hopkins kid and another option with Odom. Just think what they would of done if they had a running game.

Looks like the Passing game is open against ISU after they give up 370 to Toledo.

August 31, 2006, 11:05:37 PM
Reply #4

opcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 5189

August 31, 2006, 11:06:37 PM
Reply #5

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
ku has to go to their place in a couple weeks... eeks!!


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

August 31, 2006, 11:11:32 PM
Reply #6

Dan Rydell

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2728
Sure am glad that the Big XII television contract allowed us all to see this game on TV.

Another good job, Mr. Weiberg.   :thumbsup:

August 31, 2006, 11:16:13 PM
Reply #7

Beijing Cat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 216
My location prohibited me from watching but from the stats and game track ISU better be thankful that Toledo did't have a run game. Anybody note the secondary coverage ISU was running?

August 31, 2006, 11:19:03 PM
Reply #8

GoldbrickGangBoss

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2590
  • Personal Text
    THE b IS NOT CAPITALIZED
Toledo sounds pretty good. Iowa State... does not.

That failed 2 point conversion was brutal. It seemed like neither offense could be stopped once the overtimes started.
I'm telling you, this is not ANYTHING like the team from the beginning of conference play. You will see no more blowouts like what happened in OOC.  If we lose, it will not because these kids gave up, and it will be at the buzzer. -Rodless, before 97-70

August 31, 2006, 11:26:54 PM
Reply #9

Beijing Cat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 216
Read like it was the Hopkins kid who dropped the ball on the final 2 pt conversion try for Toledo. Was it that close? If it was sorry for him he sounded like he came to play.

Big XII fans don't get me wrong I will always cheer for 11 teams of the Big XII, and the Cats first and foremost. I was glad to see ISU win but I am also happy to hear ISU has holes in their secondary if KSU is going to start throwing the ball around. Sure seems like NU will have an advantage against ISU now.

September 01, 2006, 09:57:32 AM
Reply #10

MrWhite

  • Guest
isu gave up td drives of 99, 75 and 79 yards - and each drive was 11 plays or more.

that doesn't sound good for the clones.

we're frickin due against them

September 01, 2006, 12:47:10 PM
Reply #11

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
hopefully toledo is extra motivated to beat Kansas......@ home.

too good to be true!! :beerchug: :dancin: :dancin: :dancin: :dancin:
ksufanscopycat my friends.

September 01, 2006, 02:35:00 PM
Reply #12

greasd up deaf guy

  • Guest
Toledo sounds pretty good. Iowa State... does not.

That failed 2 point conversion was brutal. It seemed like neither offense could be stopped once the overtimes started.

Good luck with the Glass Bowl. You'll be coming home with a loss. ISU and Toledo>ku