Yoo is correct that the protections against unreasonable seraches & seizures and the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement don't apply unless one is on US soil. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe Bismullah largely agreed with that interpretation finding the holding of the detainees improper since Gitmo is US soil. Again, I need to do more than skim the highlights but my impression is that "US soil" had a lot to do with that decision; by extension the Court would be implicitly agreeing with Yoo, no?