Date: 30/07/25 - 16:35 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Hauser's Law  (Read 556 times)

May 21, 2008, 12:52:17 AM
Read 556 times

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
Pay attention lefties:

Hauser's Law: You can't soak the rich.



Key takeaway:

Quote
The data show that the tax yield has been independent of marginal tax rates over this period, but tax revenue is directly proportional to GDP. So if we want to increase tax revenue, we need to increase GDP.

What happens if we instead raise tax rates? Economists of all persuasions accept that a tax rate hike will reduce GDP, in which case Hauser's Law says it will also lower tax revenue. That's a highly inconvenient truth for redistributive tax policy, and it flies in the face of deeply felt beliefs about social justice. It would surely be unpopular today with those presidential candidates who plan to raise tax rates on the rich – if they knew about it.

So the question for lefties becomes, "Do you just hate and wish to punish success or are you truly interested in what actually works?"

 :billypopcorn:
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem

May 21, 2008, 04:31:39 PM
Reply #1

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
At least Arthur Laffer lived long enough to see his vindication ... though I doubt he needed any extrinsic proof.
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem

May 21, 2008, 04:54:15 PM
Reply #2

Chingon

  • Administrator
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 2670
  • Personal Text
    Rey de los Chingones
I personally enjoy punishing success and hate all those more successful than I.

I also bathe in the blood and sweat of the rich while suckling from the teat of the righteous.


May 21, 2008, 05:11:31 PM
Reply #3

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
I personally enjoy punishing success and hate all those more successful than I.

I also bathe in the blood and sweat of the rich while suckling from the teat of the righteous.

I can respect that; I have no problem at all with honest lefties. 
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem

May 21, 2008, 11:03:39 PM
Reply #4

Dirty Sanchez

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 4638
  • Personal Text
    Powertard Un-approved

May 22, 2008, 08:38:11 AM
Reply #5

jeffy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 7000
  • Personal Text
    ku Swallows

May 22, 2008, 10:10:03 AM
Reply #6

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks
Here's the thing that your chart doesn't address....it doesn't articulate that the premise of increasing tax rates for the wealthy is NOT to increase overall tax yield.  Instead, it is to offset the tax rate of the poor.  It's a trade off. 

Attacking disparate tax rates with this kind of argument is useless, and completely misses the point.  It isn't even about the dreaded "redistribution of wealth."

You either believe in the "social contract," or you don't.  I respect the flat tax folks, because their argument is based on equity, and dispenses with all the voodoo bullcrap.

May 22, 2008, 12:36:17 PM
Reply #7

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
So a a negative tax rate would really kick up revenues!

FREE MONEY BITCHES!
ksufanscopycat my friends.

May 22, 2008, 01:13:28 PM
Reply #8

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
So a a negative tax rate would really kick up revenues!

FREE MONEY BITCHES!

Woot!   :runaway:
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem