Date: 08/08/25 - 01:15 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: We want smaller quicker D-tackles?  (Read 366 times)

January 03, 2008, 02:32:42 PM
Read 366 times

opcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 5189
like John Finau?

Guys that penetrate and disrupt and shoot the gaps just like WVirg.

If thats the scheme then we are all looking at the wrong players.  Thats why Parish isn't needed.

I am guessing no super big nosetackle like everyone thinks.

 :blindfold:
« Last Edit: January 03, 2008, 03:57:32 PM by opcat »

January 03, 2008, 04:28:01 PM
Reply #1

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
No, we just need DT's named Dingle and Berry.

January 03, 2008, 04:47:50 PM
Reply #2

vanro031

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 837
Perhaps you need D-tackles that can tackle. Call me silly..  :ugh:

January 03, 2008, 04:51:14 PM
Reply #3

TheWildcat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 469
Perhaps you need D-tackles that can tackle. Call me silly..  :ugh:


Your silly

January 03, 2008, 04:53:51 PM
Reply #4

PCR

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2992

January 03, 2008, 05:04:46 PM
Reply #5

LimestoneOutcropping

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6938
  • Personal Text
    Skate on Sister School
Perhaps you need D-tackles that can tackle. Call me silly..  :ugh:

You need to shelve the word "silly"

You sound like a huge pillow biter/ku fan.

January 03, 2008, 05:56:20 PM
Reply #6

Shout it out loud

  • Guest
like John Finau?

Guys that penetrate and disrupt and shoot the gaps just like WVirg.

If thats the scheme then we are all looking at the wrong players.  Thats why Parish isn't needed.

I am guessing no super big nosetackle like everyone thinks.

 :blindfold:
hope so, thats good news for me :thumbsup: