Date: 27/07/25 - 07:30 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: What's your IQ?  (Read 2061 times)

December 22, 2007, 06:13:45 PM
Read 2061 times

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Not going to post mine yet for fear of being embarrassed...unless everyone else is a retard too.

December 22, 2007, 09:27:08 PM
Reply #1

catINdallas

  • Guest
I sense a trap here but I'll get the ball rolling.

135

 :peek:

December 22, 2007, 09:30:39 PM
Reply #2

Marshal Willie

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 113

December 22, 2007, 09:31:26 PM
Reply #3

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
messageboardIQ, all that matters imo.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

December 22, 2007, 09:34:29 PM
Reply #4

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
69 




It's really 130 or so.

December 22, 2007, 10:16:30 PM
Reply #5

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
I sense a trap here but I'll get the ball rolling.

135

 :peek:

I just figured mine, and was just curious.

Mines' ~130

December 22, 2007, 10:24:47 PM
Reply #6

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
ksufans.com = home to the top 5th percentile of IQ scores.




 :lol:
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

December 22, 2007, 10:48:20 PM
Reply #7

Dan Rydell

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2728
ksufans.com = home to the top 5th percentile of IQ scores.




 :lol:

Red X = low IQ, IMO. 

December 22, 2007, 10:49:34 PM
Reply #8

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.


Scratch that. Make that top 2%.  :lol:
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

December 22, 2007, 11:00:09 PM
Reply #9

chum1

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6944
I've never taken the test, but I'd guess mine is under 100.

December 22, 2007, 11:18:40 PM
Reply #10

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
I've never taken the test, but I'd guess mine is under 100.

no chance.
"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

December 23, 2007, 02:26:09 AM
Reply #11

opcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 5189
http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/famous2.html

mine was average.

I bet most people mess up the logic and math parts.

You could boost it if you worked on it.

December 23, 2007, 03:12:12 AM
Reply #12

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320


Scratch that. Make that top 2%.  :lol:

No one here is average.

Sincerely,

Ivy League graduate programs where nealry everyone graduates with a 4.0.  :lol:
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem

December 23, 2007, 10:40:39 AM
Reply #13

chum1

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6944
Something like 90% of all people think that they are smarter than the average person.

December 23, 2007, 12:02:23 PM
Reply #14

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/famous2.html

mine was average.

I bet most people mess up the logic and math parts.

You could boost it if you worked on it.

I dominate that part, but the sections that are like If bloog is gloob, and boob is sometimes gloob, then is bloog definitely boob?  Or something like that.

December 24, 2007, 11:53:08 AM
Reply #15

asava

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1374
  • Personal Text
    started the auburn/ksu hillbillie war
i took an iq test when i was in 8th grade and it gave me a score of 156. seriously doubt that though. but i guess if you look at what IQ represents it could be accurate. your score relects your propensity to learn information, not your actual intelligence.

also, there is no way chum1 is below 100. probably just shy of 200.


bold and daring

December 24, 2007, 11:58:28 AM
Reply #16

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
i took an iq test when i was in 8th grade and it gave me a score of 156. seriously doubt that though. but i guess if you look at what IQ represents it could be accurate. your score relects your propensity to learn information, not your actual intelligence.

also, there is no way chum1 is below 100. probably just shy of 200.

I always too scared to know mine.  Probably 90s.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

December 24, 2007, 03:16:46 PM
Reply #17

PCR

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2992
135... story of my life... good enough to be above average, but never enough to be great.

 :violin: :ustupid:

December 24, 2007, 03:44:26 PM
Reply #18

PurpleReign

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 492
The IQ test you guys are taking isn't accurate.  You have to take the one that is for adults to get an accurate score as your scores are comparing you to kids.  Take the one that is 16-65 yrs. old you can find them all over the internet for free.  I just took one and it said mine was 138. 

December 24, 2007, 04:29:35 PM
Reply #19

asava

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1374
  • Personal Text
    started the auburn/ksu hillbillie war
The IQ test you guys are taking isn't accurate.  You have to take the one that is for adults to get an accurate score as your scores are comparing you to kids.  Take the one that is 16-65 yrs. old you can find them all over the internet for free.  I just took one and it said mine was 138. 

actually. none of the ones on the internet are accurate. they can get you in the ballpark, but not your standard testing proceedure.


bold and daring

December 24, 2007, 04:44:56 PM
Reply #20

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
When I was like 6, I was like, "at or above the 97 percentile."

Then I took two sample tests and got 129 and 133, so I'm probably about 130.

135... story of my life... good enough to be above average, but never enough to be great.

 :violin: :ustupid:

I know how that feels.  While it may be top 97%, there are a lot of retarded people out there.

December 26, 2007, 01:01:47 AM
Reply #21

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
What do you need to be "gifted"?

December 26, 2007, 08:58:50 AM
Reply #22

doom

  • Muzzled Poster
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 9952
What do you need to be "gifted"?

> 130.  <70 is mental retardation.


I still want my cooler, bitches!

December 28, 2007, 01:12:19 PM
Reply #23

RU4KSU2

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 491
Something like 90% of all people think that they are smarter than the average person.

Also, don't forget that 87.2 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot!

 :peek:

December 29, 2007, 12:00:00 AM
Reply #24

Houstoncat93

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 687
  • Personal Text
    It's good to be good again!
http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/famous2.html

mine was average.

I bet most people mess up the logic and math parts.

You could boost it if you worked on it.

I dominate that part, but the sections that are like If bloog is gloob, and boob is sometimes gloob, then is bloog definitely boob?  Or something like that.

Ummm....you do realize that those ARE the logic parts of an IQ test right....

December 31, 2007, 05:31:10 PM
Reply #25

yosh

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3071
Internet tests are totally bogus.  I was put into the gifted program in kindergarden and had to take professionally administered IQ tests every four years until I graduated high school.  Scores were consistantly in a 5 number range everytime.  (I'd feel like a douche nozzle divulging the score) I've tried internet IQ tests that have scored me as low as the 90's (way low)and as high as the 160's (way high).  They are junk.
Cada hombre un gato salvaje!

January 01, 2008, 12:31:02 PM
Reply #26

catdude33

  • Guest
I always hated the gifted kids in school.  What did they do in that weird gifted room anyway?  I always imagined they were doing cool expirements and stuff that the rest of us were too retarded to understand, but now I'm pretty sure that's wrong.

January 01, 2008, 12:41:47 PM
Reply #27

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
http://www.kids-iq-tests.com/famous2.html

mine was average.

I bet most people mess up the logic and math parts.

You could boost it if you worked on it.

I dominate that part, but the sections that are like If bloog is gloob, and boob is sometimes gloob, then is bloog definitely boob?  Or something like that.

Ummm....you do realize that those ARE the logic parts of an IQ test right....

I dunno, I just answer the questions.

January 01, 2008, 01:03:21 PM
Reply #28

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
I always imagined they were doing cool expirements and stuff that the rest of us were too retarded to understand.

we did a lot of stuff like that.  we also spent a lot of time relaxing with the teachers over cigars and cognac, discussing how stupid the normal kids were.
"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

January 01, 2008, 05:45:39 PM
Reply #29

PurpleReign

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 492
I've taken 3 internet IQ tests and they have all been within 10 points of each other.  I don't know how you get those fluctuating results.

Our gifted room really wasn't all that great. I tried to stay out of there as much as possible. Most of the kids were weird and I didn't want to ruin my street cred in HS. Plus, I barely made it into the gifted program so all of the kids in the room were smarter than me and I didn't like it that much.