Date: 23/07/25 - 17:02 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: does this mean Norwood's eligible to play?  (Read 760 times)

November 02, 2007, 04:21:30 PM
Read 760 times

MOKSUAZ

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1797

November 02, 2007, 04:22:46 PM
Reply #1

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
he always has been eligible to play


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

November 02, 2007, 04:24:24 PM
Reply #2

MOKSUAZ

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1797
i know that, but RP said he wasn't eligible to play (under his terms) until his legal stuff was taken care of. 

shoulda worded it better. :chainsaw:

November 02, 2007, 04:30:55 PM
Reply #3

Pittcat

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1960
I'm thinking he suits up next week in Lincoln, may play may not.  If he does play it will be limited.  And depending on performance and practice possibly starts against MU.  He won't see the field against ISU.

November 02, 2007, 05:02:46 PM
Reply #4

McGrowlTowelZac

  • Premium Member
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4123
  • Personal Text
    This ZERO is my Hero
yea, i think i could see him playing again, not isu though.  he's been practicing all year, so he should be in shape and ready to go...should be interesting.

too bad he can't play any d-tackle.... :hahano:

November 02, 2007, 07:17:11 PM
Reply #5

catfan12

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 112
  • Personal Text
    i like to eat chop suey
hopefully he has a game like gonzales had last week :pray:

November 02, 2007, 10:58:59 PM
Reply #6

BigXIIpowercat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 734
Why couldn't this have been settled pre-OSU game. We might have been with 2 less turnovers and a guaranteed win.