Date: 28/07/25 - 11:27 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Last time KSU was 7-0?  (Read 10497 times)

October 26, 2007, 11:42:13 AM
Reply #60

ChiefCatchacold

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 832
  • Personal Text
    zonder klasse
My co-workers might say something mean.  Again.     :ohno:

And then I can't proudly display my collection of ksu merchandise.   :'(



October 26, 2007, 11:45:31 AM
Reply #61

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
Denial of what?

Do you have an argument, or are you just going to keep asking retarded, irrelevant rhetoricals?

You're in denial about teams not gearing up more for certain games. It happens everywhere.

Of course, didn't you argue once that momentum didn't play a factor in games? We shouldn't be surprised.

October 26, 2007, 11:48:38 AM
Reply #62

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
You're in denial about teams not gearing up more for certain games. It happens everywhere.

No, I said that happens.  Relevance?

Of course, didn't you argue once that momentum didn't play a factor in games? We shouldn't be surprised.

Link?  I said there's no evidence to support "clutch hitting", but that's completely different.

October 26, 2007, 11:51:53 AM
Reply #63

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
You're in denial about teams not gearing up more for certain games. It happens everywhere.

No, I said that happens.  Relevance?

Of course, didn't you argue once that momentum didn't play a factor in games? We shouldn't be surprised.

a) You said it only happens to "weak teams." Retarded.

b) Re: "clutch hitting." If you say so. Also retarded. Why do some players have batting averages that are drastically different with men in scoring position?

But I digress. Your "holier than thou" stance is painfully transparent.

Link?  I said there's no evidence to support "clutch hitting", but that's completely different.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2007, 11:55:18 AM by kougar24 »

October 26, 2007, 11:53:37 AM
Reply #64

JesusShuttlesworth

  • Guest
Mods, can we please delete this thread? 

October 26, 2007, 11:54:34 AM
Reply #65

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
I'd rather beat Mizzou, OSU, OU, TTU, TAMU, UT, or NU before ku, to be honest.

October 26, 2007, 11:55:45 AM
Reply #66

KSUTOMMY

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3578
  • Personal Text
    The "other" KSU
Can you guys send some of you MOJO to our defense? O Line?

October 26, 2007, 11:56:08 AM
Reply #67

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
I'd rather beat Mizzou, OSU, OU, TTU, TAMU, UT, or NU before ku, to be honest.

Who gives a f*ck about Texas Tech?

October 26, 2007, 11:56:19 AM
Reply #68

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
I'd rather beat Mizzou, OSU, OU, TTU, TAMU, UT, or NU before ku, to be honest.

Agreed
<---------Click the ball

October 26, 2007, 11:57:17 AM
Reply #69

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
I'd rather beat Mizzou, OSU, OU, TTU, TAMU, UT, or NU before ku, to be honest.

Who gives a f*ck about Texas Tech?

Why are you so obsessed with ku?  Society doesn't pay attention to who wins that game.  Society looks up in amazement if we beat a team that is good/usually good.
<---------Click the ball

October 26, 2007, 11:57:59 AM
Reply #70

KSUTOMMY

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3578
  • Personal Text
    The "other" KSU
I'd rather beat Mizzou, OSU, OU, TTU, TAMU, UT, or NU before ku, to be honest.
CU?

October 26, 2007, 11:58:19 AM
Reply #71

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
I'd rather beat Mizzou, OSU, OU, TTU, TAMU, UT, or NU before ku, to be honest.

Who gives a f*ck about Texas Tech?
Skyline trio, Texas recruits, Jucos. It's not hard to recruit against Kansas since they carry all the cons that we do (being in Kansas), it's nice to have at least one thing on the Texas schools that we recruit against.

October 26, 2007, 11:59:03 AM
Reply #72

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
You're in denial about teams not gearing up more for certain games. It happens everywhere.

No, I said that happens.  Relevance?

Of course, didn't you argue once that momentum didn't play a factor in games? We shouldn't be surprised.

a) You said it only happens to "weak teams." Retarded.

b) Re: "clutch hitting." If you say so. Also retarded. Why do some players have batting averages that are drastically different with men in scoring position?

But I digress. Your "holier than thou" stance is painfully transparent.

Link?  I said there's no evidence to support "clutch hitting", but that's completely different.

Again, relevance?  You have gone off on a ridiculous tangent.  Do you have a point beyond "Rusty has a holier than thou stance"?  I'm genuinely curious.

October 26, 2007, 12:00:32 PM
Reply #73

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
I'd rather beat Mizzou, OSU, OU, TTU, TAMU, UT, or NU before ku, to be honest.
CU?
I initially included them but took them off because I listed too many. Honestly, my list would look something like this..


1. Texas
2. OU
3. Nebraska
4. Mizzou
5. Texas A&M
6. OSU
7. Texas Tech
8. Colorado
9. ku
10. ISU
11. Baylor

October 26, 2007, 12:05:57 PM
Reply #74

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
I'd rather beat Mizzou, OSU, OU, TTU, TAMU, UT, or NU before ku, to be honest.
CU?
I initially included them but took them off because I listed too many. Honestly, my list would look something like this..


1. Texas
2. OU
3. Nebraska
4. Mizzou
5. Texas A&M
6. OSU
7. Texas Tech
8. Colorado
9. ku
10. ISU
11. Baylor

Mine would be similare but end up
1. TX
2. NU
3. OU
4. A&M
5. Mizzou
6. OSU
7. Tech
8. ku
9. CU
10. ISU
11. Baylor
<---------Click the ball

October 26, 2007, 12:08:04 PM
Reply #75

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
You're in denial about teams not gearing up more for certain games. It happens everywhere.

No, I said that happens.  Relevance?

Of course, didn't you argue once that momentum didn't play a factor in games? We shouldn't be surprised.

a) You said it only happens to "weak teams." Retarded.

b) Re: "clutch hitting." If you say so. Also retarded. Why do some players have batting averages that are drastically different with men in scoring position?

But I digress. Your "holier than thou" stance is painfully transparent.

Link?  I said there's no evidence to support "clutch hitting", but that's completely different.

Again, relevance?  You have gone off on a ridiculous tangent.  Do you have a point beyond "Rusty has a holier than thou stance"?  I'm genuinely curious.

I made my point before. Beating ku is indeed important for recruiting.

October 26, 2007, 12:13:03 PM
Reply #76

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
I made my point before. Beating ku is indeed important for recruiting.

But less important than beating a team that is normally good.
<---------Click the ball

October 26, 2007, 12:17:14 PM
Reply #77

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
I say not beating ku diminishes beating a team that's "normally" good by quite a bit.   Of course using the Rusty logic which dictates that since a guy like Bill Snyder didn't come out and publicly say that beating ku and (and MU as well) wasn't important . . . then it had to be just like every other game.   

I remember after a couple of wins against MU, particularly after the win there in 1996, Snyder acted like he had just gotten a blowjob from the entire golden girls squad in the postgame interview.

October 26, 2007, 12:24:52 PM
Reply #78

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
I know most of you will deny it, but losing to Kansas hurts you more than losing to anyone else in the country.  I won't argue that beating Kansas is as important to you guys as beating Texas/Oklahoma, but it's up there.  You're in denial if you can't admit that you're a little nervous about the way that the rivalry has evolved.  Kansas is becoming a lot like Bill Snyder's program at Kansas State.   

October 26, 2007, 12:25:08 PM
Reply #79

JesusShuttlesworth

  • Guest
Who is the tiny penis KSU fan who started this thread?  

October 26, 2007, 12:26:58 PM
Reply #80

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
I know most of you will deny it, but losing to Kansas hurts you more than losing to anyone else in the country.  I won't argue that beating Kansas is as important to you guys as beating Texas/Oklahoma, but it's up there.  You're in denial if you can't admit that you're a little nervous about the way that the rivalry has evolved.  Kansas is becoming a lot like Bill Snyder's program at Kansas State.   
:rolleyes:

October 26, 2007, 12:29:53 PM
Reply #81

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
I know most of you will deny it, but losing to Kansas hurts you more than losing to anyone else in the country.  I won't argue that beating Kansas is as important to you guys as beating Texas/Oklahoma, but it's up there.  You're in denial if you can't admit that you're a little nervous about the way that the rivalry has evolved.  Kansas is becoming a lot like Bill Snyder's program at Kansas State.   

Similar to the reality that Mark Mangino was hired with edict 1a-beat KSU . . . and for similar reasons that you stated above.

Now, you can talk about how ku is "becoming a lot like Bill Snyder's" program all you want, but until that happens, it's nothing but talk.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2007, 12:38:04 PM by sonofdaxjones »

October 26, 2007, 12:31:59 PM
Reply #82

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
I know most of you will deny it, but losing to Kansas hurts you more than losing to anyone else in the country.  I won't argue that beating Kansas is as important to you guys as beating Texas/Oklahoma, but it's up there.  You're in denial if you can't admit that you're a little nervous about the way that the rivalry has evolved.  Kansas is becoming a lot like Bill Snyder's program at Kansas State.   
:flush:

Bill Snyder's program at Kansas State held excellence in the Big 8 and Big 12 for over a decade.  ku has played the weakest schedule known to man for 7 games and now wants to compare itself to KSU under Snyder? Do you realize why we have a hard time taking any ku football fan seriously?  

And you're kidding yourself if you really think that losing to you guys hurts us more than anyone else in the country.  I watched us lose to you clowns and was over it when I finished my beer.  We just don't hold you guys in the same regard as actual good teams, sorry.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

October 26, 2007, 12:34:09 PM
Reply #83

bws

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 123
Quote
I say not beating ku diminishes beating a team that's "normally" good by quite a bit. 

Bingo. Consistency is key. That's what made Snyder great. Losing 3 of 4 to ku is not good. You're crazy if you think otherwise.

October 26, 2007, 12:41:29 PM
Reply #84

ChiefCatchacold

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 832
  • Personal Text
    zonder klasse
Quote
I say not beating ku diminishes beating a team that's "normally" good by quite a bit. 

Bingo. Consistency is key. That's what made Snyder great. Losing 3 of 4 to ku is not good. You're crazy if you think otherwise.

Losing = not good.  Got it.



October 26, 2007, 01:13:48 PM
Reply #85

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
I made my point before. Beating ku is indeed important for recruiting.

Really?

Where's the evidence?

In 2007, after losing 2 of 3, KSU signed 6 of the top 20 in Kansas.  ku signed 4.

In 2004, after winning 11 straight and coming off a Big 12 title, KSU signed 4 of the top 15.  ku signed 3.

I say not beating ku diminishes beating a team that's "normally" good by quite a bit.   Of course using the Rusty logic which dictates that since a guy like Bill Snyder didn't come out and publicly say that beating ku and (and MU as well) wasn't important . . . then it had to be just like every other game.   

I said beating ku and MU was equally important.  Both are more important than beating Baylor or Iowa State, less important than beating Nebraska or OU or Texas.

Really, I wish Snyder would have made beating Nebraska a higher priority than sh*tty Kansas and Mizzou teams.  Maybe he gets an NC in 97 if he'd tried harder against Nebraska.

October 26, 2007, 01:14:26 PM
Reply #86

KSUTOMMY

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3578
  • Personal Text
    The "other" KSU
I know most of you will deny it, but losing to Kansas hurts you more than losing to anyone else in the country.  I won't argue that beating Kansas is as important to you guys as beating Texas/Oklahoma, but it's up there.  You're in denial if you can't admit that you're a little nervous about the way that the rivalry has evolved.  Kansas is becoming a lot like Bill Snyder's program at Kansas State.   

I will admit that when ku fan admits that losing to KSU in Basketball is important. Oh, comparing ku/Mangina to what Bill Snyder did is ridiculous. If you compare what Mangina has done this year to when Marshall was undefeated a while back I will buy that. Again refer to above as to where the ku win stands.

October 26, 2007, 01:27:09 PM
Reply #87

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
Beating NU was important to Bill.  I've talked to several players (circa 1996-2001) who said that the week of the Nebraska game was some of the most intense practices and when the coaches were more intense than any other week.  ku was an after thought at that point because we could roll our 2nd and 3rd team out there and beat them.  No one cared about ku because they didn't matter. 

There just has never been a stretch of years where both ku and KSU have been good at the same time in football...therefore, there are always "correlations" that have tried to be drawn to winning that game, when in reality, it's about winning every other game besides that game.  I won't say the ku game is not important in terms of boosters/alumni, nor will I discount its importance to potential recruits, especially if ku continues to beat us year in and year out. 

But honestly, if ku is beating us year in and year out from now on, that probably means we aren't a good football team to begin with or rather, they are just a better team who "deserves" to get those recruits or "deserves" to get more publicity.     

October 26, 2007, 01:28:42 PM
Reply #88

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
I know most of you will deny it, but losing to Kansas hurts you more than losing to anyone else in the country.  I won't argue that beating Kansas is as important to you guys as beating Texas/Oklahoma, but it's up there.  You're in denial if you can't admit that you're a little nervous about the way that the rivalry has evolved.  Kansas is becoming a lot like Bill Snyder's program at Kansas State.   

I will admit that when ku fan admits that losing to KSU in Basketball is important. Oh, comparing ku/Mangina to what Bill Snyder did is ridiculous. If you compare what Mangina has done this year to when Marshall was undefeated a while back I will buy that. Again refer to above as to where the ku win stands.

I think that most Kansas fans would admit that any rivalry game is important.  However, in basketball, individual games aren't as important as they are in football, so it's hard to really compare.  Kansas also plays its rivals (K-State and Mizzou) twice in conference play, so there's always the chance of getting redemption in the same season.  

On the Synder/Mangino comparison, you've got to take a look at what both coaches had done at this point in their careers.  Here are some interesting facts (found this on phog):

Both of their first seasons were awful, Snyder 1-10, Mangino 2-10, mostly because of inheriting a bad team. Both coaches’ teams struggled on the road. Through the first five and a half years of Snyder’s career, Kansas State was 5-21 away from Manhattan. Through five and a half years, Kansas is 6-21 under Mangino away from Lawrence.

The formula Bill Snyder used for making Kansas State a national power is also similar to what Mangino did to gain national recognition. Both coaches have added wins to the schedule by playing soft opponents during the nonconference part of the season. Through five and a half seasons, Snyder’s nonconference record was 18-6. Mangino, through the first five and a half season’s of his career, has gone 18-6 in nonconference play.

For a team near the cellar of college football, recruiting can be tricky, and coaches have to find players that marquis schools overlook. Players that come from a junior college or players that are undersized for their position are what Snyder capitalized on and what Mangino is also doing.

On Oct. 22, 1994, the Kansas State Wildcats were 4-2 (1-2 Big 8 ) under Bill Snyder and went on to finish the season 9-3 (5-2 Big 8 ). They finished the season ranked No. 19 in the AP poll, and No. 16 in the CNN/USA Today Coaches’ Poll. They were nearly a permanent fixture in the rankings for the next ten years.

Today, Oct. 22, 2007, Kansas is ranked No. 12 in the AP poll, No. 10 in the USA Today Coaches Poll and No. 9 in the BCS poll. Kansas is undefeated at 7-0 under Mark Mangino. Though Bill Snyder was well on his way in establishing Kansas State as a national power five years into his coaching career, it was not until 1998 when Kansas State went 7-0.

Mark Mangino was an assistant coach at Kansas State from 1991-1998 and was around to witness Bill Snyder build a football team from a laughing stock to a national power. Through five and a half years of coaching, both coaches careers look similar. It was clear that Mangino learned a thing or two under Bill Snyder. It will not be surprising to see Kansas football enjoy success similar to that which Snyder brought to Kansas State.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2007, 01:31:21 PM by BMWJhawk »

October 26, 2007, 01:29:03 PM
Reply #89

swish1

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1168
anyone that says as a fan that they would rather beat texas tech than ku is an idiot.

and for rusty...

do rivalry games exist?