I see you have a firm grip on satire. The bolded is pathetic.
Sounds like you honestly believed your post couldn't be criticized. That is pathetic KT. The point was that you're just an AIP like the rest of us. If you can't handle satire or criticism, you should probably post at Phognet.
Look, dipcrap.
KT's meltdown begins.
I never said I had any credibility in the subject.
Doesn't matter. You made an illogical comparison of someone you don't like who is successful with someone you don't like who is more successful.
You're the one melting down; taking yourself and this guy too seriously.
No, I'm just pointing out childish nonsense. The Hannah Montana Web site has openings for AIPs if you guys can't handle adult dialogue.
You're acting like I've criticized your kid with disabilities.
Maybe you did.
I simply added an opinion that he's dull to listen to-which is the comparison I was making.
Dull?? You said painful. I would have respected the former.
You then decided to change the subject and note Stein's success.
OMG, you're not actually going to dissect Ben Stein's career?? Don't do it, no, don't ... oh no too late ...
Which, let's be honest, Stein's mainstream success at least partially stems from an 80's film playing the role of a boring teacher.
You forgot the eye drops commercials.
You can't seem to stay on topic or understand your flawed logic.
I wasn't the one who brought up Ben Stein. Is his name in the thread??
The overall problem is this: you've wandered into this thread in an attempt to refute opinions (fruitless?) in whiny-little-bitch fashion with pretentious "look at me, the expert on the subject" overtones.
I'm sorry, but where do you see the words 'look at me" or "expert on the subject" in one of my posts??
Kat Kid asserts that your objectivity can be criticized because you have worked with him.
Sure, my objectivity can be criticized, but it's irrelevant when the person who hasn't worked with him is being hypocritical about his or her own objectivity.
Your putrid little meltdown eludes to it as well; taking sad little pokes at anyone that disagrees with your opinion. Particularly with the "if I were Matt" line.
IOW, you think it's acceptable for AIPs to say they hate someone, call them a tool and/or infer they are less 'sh*tty' than other people?? What would you do if you were Matt?? Throw a party???
Since you're apparently the only person in your mind qualified to criticize the guy, just shut the frack up and revel in your smug little sense of satisfaction that you're omnipotent on the matter.
And yet another strawman argument. I never said I was the only one qualified or that I was omnipotent. That's just silly. All I've done as a former broadcaster is try to correct some gross misperceptions of the business as it pertains to Matt Walter's employment.
However, next time you consider criticizing someone's work in any particular field you don't have significant knowledge in, expect some sensitive little hemorrhoid like yourself to prate on and on about it.
The only knowledge displayed in the OP was somebody utilizing the word hate and horrifying, and now we see that you're establishing yourself as an expert at calling names. Rock on KT.
If people think he sucks, he sucks.
Got to be honest, ksdb. Mixing it up with board heavyweights like Rusty and KK is probably not the best idea for you.
Pointless advice noted. Thanks.
Rusty pretty much hit the nail on the head here.
Not really, because the inverse would be true. If people think he's competent, he's competent.
