Date: 02/08/25 - 09:12 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Auburn and Kansas  (Read 1212 times)

October 07, 2007, 11:34:40 AM
Read 1212 times

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
"woulda coulda shoulda"

 :'(

October 07, 2007, 11:40:43 AM
Reply #1

cireksu

  • Guest
yes, and they show you that if you take away our special teams and just focus on getting pressure on freeman that you've got a great chance to beat us because we don't make any adjustments.

October 07, 2007, 11:52:15 AM
Reply #2

kstate16

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1642
yes, and they show you that if you take away our special teams and just focus on getting pressure on freeman that you've got a great chance to beat us because we don't make any adjustments.
qft. frack.

October 07, 2007, 01:03:18 PM
Reply #3

Dan Rydell

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2728
Both ranked.  If we end the year having only lost to teams that are ultimately ranked, I'll be pretty happy.

October 07, 2007, 01:16:29 PM
Reply #4

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.


October 07, 2007, 01:18:22 PM
Reply #5

cireksu

  • Guest
What if I told you that we gift wrapped that game for ku?

what a mind &@#% that is!

October 07, 2007, 01:20:15 PM
Reply #6

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



ku did not dominate in all aspects. We had a TD taken away because of a bogus holding call. You had an INT off a facemask, so it's not like all the freak things went our way. Our D held ku when our LB's knew who to cover. Our offense was able to move the ball in the first half just fine. All in all, we were two really even teams. It shows how much you know about football (not surprised).

October 07, 2007, 01:24:02 PM
Reply #7

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
If anything, ku should have won by more.  K-State was clearly an inferior opponent.

October 07, 2007, 01:26:28 PM
Reply #8

cireksu

  • Guest
KSU should have kicked deep after we took that late 4th quarter lead.  You can thank Ron Prince for handing you that game.

October 07, 2007, 01:30:15 PM
Reply #9

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
No, you can thank ku for keeping it as close as it was.  Mangino almost F'ed up when he decided not to take the points when ku got stopped at your 15-yard line.  You also got 2nd-life after a terrible roughing the kicker penalty that never should have been called.  That drive resulted in a TD when ku should have had the ball after a 3-and-out.  ku gift-wrapped a TD with an INT off the facemask deep in our own territory.  Derek Fine and Briscoe both dropped sure TD passes and ku botched an extra point.  I'm just disappointed ku only won by 6. 
« Last Edit: October 07, 2007, 01:31:46 PM by BMWJhawk »

October 07, 2007, 01:33:42 PM
Reply #10

Dan Rydell

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2728
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



Actually, KSU should have been up 28-7 at half.  I expect ku would have folded after that.

October 07, 2007, 01:35:23 PM
Reply #11

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
LOL @ how bad K-State is at football

October 07, 2007, 01:36:25 PM
Reply #12

cireksu

  • Guest
roughing the punter is roughing the punter, just because it goes against you doesnt mean it didn't happen.  Roughing the punter doesn't mean tackling him.


an
LOL @ how bad K-State is at football


and he concedes.

October 07, 2007, 01:39:19 PM
Reply #13

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 

October 07, 2007, 01:40:30 PM
Reply #14

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 

the only reason ku won last year was the momentum after this same call.

glass houses dude.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

October 07, 2007, 01:41:37 PM
Reply #15

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
ku won by 3 TD's last year.  It wasn't even close. 

October 07, 2007, 01:43:53 PM
Reply #16

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 

Seriously, you're f'ing stupid.  It was roughing the kicker, they all ran into our kicker.  But fine, I'll give you that penalty and if you give me the phantom personal foul on AA and phantom holding on Mastrud that killed two potential scoring drives.  Both of those were entirely worse than a judgement call between running into and roughing because clearly a penatly occurred.   Look, you won because you could run the ball.  

October 07, 2007, 01:44:03 PM
Reply #17

cireksu

  • Guest
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 

no roughing the punter is blatantly hitting or not giving him room to land.

learn football.

October 07, 2007, 01:46:30 PM
Reply #18

WILDCAT NATION

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1999
The argyle sweatered douche is still around?

I'll be damned.

October 07, 2007, 02:16:56 PM
Reply #19

kstate16

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1642
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



ku did not dominate in all aspects. We had a TD taken away because of a bogus holding call. You had an INT off a facemask, so it's not like all the freak things went our way. Our D held ku when our LB's knew who to cover. Our offense was able to move the ball in the first half just fine. All in all, we were two really even teams. It shows how much you know about football (not surprised).
Don't forget EVERY fumble ku had went right back to you guys, those could've been huge.  just another example of more things that went your way. although, this is not an excuse, just proving you wrong.  you won in the second half after taking momentum and running down our throats.

October 07, 2007, 03:04:02 PM
Reply #20

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

October 07, 2007, 03:04:42 PM
Reply #21

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
I'll give you your 50 though, I crap out 50 dollars for breakfast.

October 07, 2007, 03:05:29 PM
Reply #22

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
Roughing the punter is when you blatantly hit the punter after the play is over.  Your dumbass punter fell on top of one of ku's players and they called that a roughing the kicker penalty.  If anything, it was a running into the kicker penalty, which still wouldn't have been enough to give K-State a first down. 

Go back to basketball

Apparently this is the first every football game you watched because roughing (not running into) IS NOT blatantly hitting the punter after the play, although it can include that.  Refs always call aggressive penalties when it comes to such situation, K-State happened to make that mistake of being under the punter as he comes down far more than once last year.
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

October 07, 2007, 03:09:43 PM
Reply #23

PittsburgJayhawk

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 250
  • Personal Text
    I'm impossible to fool.
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

LOL

Do you think Arthur Brown enjoyed the game?

October 07, 2007, 03:11:26 PM
Reply #24

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

LOL

Do you think Arthur Brown enjoyed the game?

He wasn't there.  Bryce was, but I don't think that'll change his opinion of KSU, since he is a lifelong fan.  He's no bandwagon ku fan.

October 07, 2007, 03:13:24 PM
Reply #25

PittsburgJayhawk

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 250
  • Personal Text
    I'm impossible to fool.
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

LOL

Do you think Arthur Brown enjoyed the game?

He wasn't there.  Bryce was, but I don't think that'll change his opinion of KSU, since he is a lifelong fan.  He's no bandwagon ku fan.

I have to admit, part of the reason I'm enjoying the afterglow of the win so immensely is because I know that you go to ku.  It's going to be a fun week for you, sir.

Enjoy!

October 07, 2007, 03:14:29 PM
Reply #26

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

LOL

Do you think Arthur Brown enjoyed the game?

He wasn't there.  Bryce was, but I don't think that'll change his opinion of KSU, since he is a lifelong fan.  He's no bandwagon ku fan.

I have to admit, part of the reason I'm enjoying the afterglow of the win so immensely is because I know that you go to ku.  It's going to be a fun week for you, sir.

Enjoy!

I caught a lot of "flack" for the power towel video, so that will be my excuse this week.  I'm prepared.

October 07, 2007, 03:20:12 PM
Reply #27

Legore

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1686
No, you can thank ku for keeping it as close as it was.  Mangino almost F'ed up when he decided not to take the points when ku got stopped at your 15-yard line.  You also got 2nd-life after a terrible roughing the kicker penalty that never should have been called.  That drive resulted in a TD when ku should have had the ball after a 3-and-out.  ku gift-wrapped a TD with an INT off the facemask deep in our own territory.  Derek Fine and Briscoe both dropped sure TD passes and ku botched an extra point.  I'm just disappointed ku only won by 6. 

We got a field goal after the roughing the kicker not a TD.  When Briscoe dropped the TD ku scored about 4 plays later on a middle screen so it had no affect on the score.  Fine should have caught the ball in the endzone that one did cost you 4 points.  KSU blew chances in the first half and ku blew chances in the second.  In the end I think things evened out pretty well break wise and the better team won the game by about the right score.  

Besides mistakes and funny bunces are part of every game ku muffed two points in the first half and got lucky bounces on both.   KSU had a FG that looked good the whole way hit the post and bounced out insead of going through. KSU had several penalties that killed drives when they had excellent field position at least two of the penalties were questionable calls and knocked KSU out of field goal range.  ku got an int on a tipped ball at the end of the first half that set them up to tie the score the player that tipped the ball was only in position to tip it because he was totally stoned by the KSU o-lineman.  We had some similar plays like that go our way against Texas last week it's just part of the game.   No team ever plays a perfect game and if they ever did they would probably beat just about anyone with ease.  

October 07, 2007, 04:52:03 PM
Reply #28

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
No... ku should have won by a lot more than we did.  ku dominated the game in all aspects and gift-wrapped one of your TD's with an INT off of a facemask.  I really expected K-State to put up more of a fight.



And KSU should have held on to their lead with 4 minutes left.

ku fans are pathetic, IMO.

Yesterday after the game I was watching more cfb at my friend's...a ku fan was talking mad crap...couldn't name a QB other than Whittemore in the last 5 years, didn't know where Vick went to college, and was wondering what "75 seconds" meant when there was "75 sec" on the field.

Because all ku fans are exactly the same.

Can't wait to collect my $50 on Monday.
« Last Edit: October 07, 2007, 04:55:10 PM by BMWJhawk »

October 07, 2007, 05:04:56 PM
Reply #29

BullHawkWheel

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1834
bmw, they will never admit, even though they know it deep inside, that ku is a better fb team than ksu.  we dont have to admit anything, we just let the scoreboard do the talking for us.