Date: 03/08/25 - 13:19 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Haven't score since 1999  (Read 716 times)

October 05, 2007, 10:44:44 PM
Read 716 times

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
starting to get national attention, mentioned (and lol'ed) by ESPn guys;
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

October 05, 2007, 10:49:22 PM
Reply #1

bullhawkey

  • Guest
starting to get national attention, mentioned (and lol'ed) by ESPn guys;

Excellent!  Especially, since "Haven't score since 1999" is completely inaccurate and a grammatical nightmare.

You and ESPN have your fun with inaccurate facts.

We ku fans will enjoy real history ...

and likely, the victory tomorrow!!!





October 05, 2007, 10:50:22 PM
Reply #2

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
LOL. That's pretty bad. thx dude.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

October 05, 2007, 10:53:16 PM
Reply #3

bullhawkey

  • Guest
LOL. That's pretty bad. thx dude.

It's all in good fun, fatty!

October 05, 2007, 10:55:37 PM
Reply #4

KSUTOMMY

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3578
  • Personal Text
    The "other" KSU
sorry... when you are not even at 20 points - your FGs dont count - as we all know, that was TDs. I think that everyone BUT Lou Holtz knows that ku's GAWDY record is a fraud. BTW your non con teams have a combined 3-14 record. Tomorrow should be pretty fun.

October 05, 2007, 11:03:17 PM
Reply #5

bullhawkey

  • Guest
sorry... when you are not even at 20 points - your FGs dont count - as we all know, that was TDs. I think that everyone BUT Lou Holtz knows that ku's GAWDY record is a fraud. BTW your non con teams have a combined 3-14 record. Tomorrow should be pretty fun.

Although I speak several languages fairly well, parts of your post are incomprehensible. 

As to the comprehensible parts, Yes!!! ku's 4-0 record is questionable.  The non-con schedule was very weak.  Nonetheless, the margins of victory were great, and not necessarily in line with the performance of ku teams that KSU has found itself capable of defeating in the last decade -- not counting last year.

October 05, 2007, 11:23:43 PM
Reply #6

KSUTOMMY

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3578
  • Personal Text
    The "other" KSU
sorry... when you are not even at 20 points - your FGs dont count - as we all know, that was TDs. I think that everyone BUT Lou Holtz knows that ku's GAWDY record is a fraud. BTW your non con teams have a combined 3-14 record. Tomorrow should be pretty fun.

Although I speak several languages fairly well, parts of your post are incomprehensible. 

As to the comprehensible parts, Yes!!! ku's 4-0 record is questionable.  The non-con schedule was very weak.  Nonetheless, the margins of victory were great, and not necessarily in line with the performance of ku teams that KSU has found itself capable of defeating in the last decade -- not counting last year.

Snyder loved the ND women's schools for the blind... this I do not hide, nor was I very proud of that. BUT, we consistantly backed it up. BTW, until Mangina plays USC a few times... heck, until he plays Marshall - we'll just wait to see the product. I give you a chance tomorrow at kicking out teeth in - now I need to work on somethign with a better chance like me winning the FREAKING POWERBALL!

October 05, 2007, 11:31:57 PM
Reply #7

bullhawkey

  • Guest
sorry... when you are not even at 20 points - your FGs dont count - as we all know, that was TDs. I think that everyone BUT Lou Holtz knows that ku's GAWDY record is a fraud. BTW your non con teams have a combined 3-14 record. Tomorrow should be pretty fun.

Although I speak several languages fairly well, parts of your post are incomprehensible. 

As to the comprehensible parts, Yes!!! ku's 4-0 record is questionable.  The non-con schedule was very weak.  Nonetheless, the margins of victory were great, and not necessarily in line with the performance of ku teams that KSU has found itself capable of defeating in the last decade -- not counting last year.

Snyder loved the ND women's schools for the blind... this I do not hide, nor was I very proud of that. BUT, we consistantly backed it up. BTW, until Mangina plays USC a few times... heck, until he plays Marshall - we'll just wait to see the product. I give you a chance tomorrow at kicking out teeth in - now I need to work on somethign with a better chance like me winning the FREAKING POWERBALL!

Your "consistant" pursuit of ignorance is of no concern to me.  Stupid is as stupid does.

As far as Mangino's product is concerned -- is your memory so short as to recall the loss to his PHATNESS in Lawrence last year?  We don't need to beat USC to prove we're better than KSU, so long as we beat KSU. 

October 05, 2007, 11:44:44 PM
Reply #8

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
sorry... when you are not even at 20 points - your FGs dont count - as we all know, that was TDs. I think that everyone BUT Lou Holtz knows that ku's GAWDY record is a fraud. BTW your non con teams have a combined 3-14 record. Tomorrow should be pretty fun.

Although I speak several languages fairly well, parts of your post are incomprehensible. 

As to the comprehensible parts, Yes!!! ku's 4-0 record is questionable.  The non-con schedule was very weak.  Nonetheless, the margins of victory were great, and not necessarily in line with the performance of ku teams that KSU has found itself capable of defeating in the last decade -- not counting last year.

while true, this years crop of ku opponenets have been worse than anything Mangino has faced in the OOC.

I've looked at many computer rankings and can't find on that doesn't list ku's OOC anything but not just last, but dead last.

just imo.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

October 05, 2007, 11:46:39 PM
Reply #9

southkscatfan

  • Guest
It ain't just your opinion.
                                      :beerchug:

October 05, 2007, 11:52:46 PM
Reply #10

bullhawkey

  • Guest
sorry... when you are not even at 20 points - your FGs dont count - as we all know, that was TDs. I think that everyone BUT Lou Holtz knows that ku's GAWDY record is a fraud. BTW your non con teams have a combined 3-14 record. Tomorrow should be pretty fun.

Although I speak several languages fairly well, parts of your post are incomprehensible. 

As to the comprehensible parts, Yes!!! ku's 4-0 record is questionable.  The non-con schedule was very weak.  Nonetheless, the margins of victory were great, and not necessarily in line with the performance of ku teams that KSU has found itself capable of defeating in the last decade -- not counting last year.

while true, this years crop of ku opponenets have been worse than anything Mangino has faced in the OOC.

I've looked at many computer rankings and can't find on that doesn't list ku's OOC anything but not just last, but dead last.

just imo.

Then your boys better win.  Otherwise... .... and ...

October 05, 2007, 11:55:26 PM
Reply #11

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Quote
Then your boys better win.  Otherwise... .... and ...

Yep, I think we will.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

October 06, 2007, 12:18:32 AM
Reply #12

KSU_Ebes

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 62
Yes I was out at the bars tonight and there are a lot of ku fans out tonight.  At least the ones that I have talked to haven't gotten there hopes up to high.  The main reason being that they are 2-20 under Mangino in the Big XII on the road.  They think they have a good team but until they prove it on the road they are keeping their excitement to a minimum.  I don't think we can hold them without a touchdown tomorrow, but however I do think we can win pretty easily.  KSU 42- ku 13 :)

October 06, 2007, 12:31:37 AM
Reply #13

bullhawkey

  • Guest
Yes I was out at the bars tonight and there are a lot of ku fans out tonight.  At least the ones that I have talked to haven't gotten there hopes up to high.  The main reason being that they are 2-20 under Mangino in the Big XII on the road.  They think they have a good team but until they prove it on the road they are keeping their excitement to a minimum.  I don't think we can hold them without a touchdown tomorrow, but however I do think we can win pretty easily.  KSU 42- ku 13 :)

Yes!  Our confidence worries me a bit, considering our competition. 

I was pulling for you all during the Auburn game -- BAD ku FAN THAT I AM.  But I haven't figured your team out yet.  I saw Texas as weak, as did the whole country after the first few weeks, from the start -- though perennial, initial positions prevented it's fall from grace.

I honestly think we've got you matched relatively evenly, personnel wise, and, thus far, Reesing appears to be far more comfortable in his skin, so to speak, than does Freeman.  But who knows what will happen in Manhattan.  Reesing hasn't really proven that he can overcome a hostile crowd.  This game is up for grabs if the offenses retain control of the game. 

October 06, 2007, 02:40:25 AM
Reply #14

KSU_Ebes

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 62
i agree we do match up quite well.  Just until you prove you can play in a hostile environment I'm not gonna worry to much.  But I will eat my words if they(ku) prove me wrong.  I hope they do prove me wrong, Just not when they play in manhattan :)  :beerchug:

October 06, 2007, 02:52:06 AM
Reply #15

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
starting to get national attention, mentioned (and lol'ed) by ESPn guys;

Excellent!  Especially, since "Haven't score since 1999" is completely inaccurate and a grammatical nightmare.

You and ESPN have your fun with inaccurate facts.

We ku fans will enjoy real history ...

and likely, the victory tomorrow!!!

I know someone who's *never* going to score.   :lol:
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem