Date: 05/08/25 - 15:26 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Jack Harry on Kietz...  (Read 1127 times)

October 03, 2007, 03:00:49 PM
Read 1127 times

WildWillie21

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 765
Coming up soon. This oughta be good...



   


October 03, 2007, 03:03:10 PM
Reply #1

stormnut

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1722
Coming up soon. This oughta be good...



   



This ought to be good indeed. Although Kevin will probably make sure to keep him happy.


October 03, 2007, 03:28:02 PM
Reply #2

AzCat

  • Classless Cat
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7320
Ladies & gentlemen, I present: The Problem

October 03, 2007, 03:32:15 PM
Reply #3

stormnut

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1722
Well?

Jack would not go on record. He knows that ku will lose this game and won't put his name on the line.


October 03, 2007, 03:35:27 PM
Reply #4

WildWillie21

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 765
Very vanilla.

Kietz showed him up by playing clip of last week where he(jack) said AU was no good and UT was awsome. Jack had no comment really.

Other than that they flirted around with eachother over nubb/mizzou and a little ksu/ku.

October 03, 2007, 03:54:44 PM
Reply #5

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
jack harry said that mark mangino was going to beat KSU by using lasers.  $299 for all you want worth of lasers, KSU should be beat within 6 months.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

October 03, 2007, 03:55:52 PM
Reply #6

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
Jack Harry is hilarious.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

October 03, 2007, 03:56:59 PM
Reply #7

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
"Perceptions and rankings are the dumbest things in the world."

 :banghead: Kietz

October 03, 2007, 03:57:09 PM
Reply #8

WildWillie21

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 765
Quote
I don't care

 :lol:

October 03, 2007, 04:07:28 PM
Reply #9

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
Kietz comparing the Big XII North to the AFC West is illogical, because you don't have to recruit in the NFL.

Perceptions and rankings DO matter in recruiting.

October 03, 2007, 04:12:00 PM
Reply #10

ArchE_Cat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1117
  • Personal Text
    ksufanscopycat
Kietz also says Garth Brooks lives in Stillwater, OK....

"...thats not true!!!" - from someone who does live in Stillwater

Garth lives near Owasso, OK.

October 03, 2007, 04:17:47 PM
Reply #11

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
Kietz comparing the Big XII North to the AFC West is illogical, because you don't have to recruit in the NFL.

Perceptions and rankings DO matter in recruiting.

Did you hear the caller?

The caller was an idiot.  Keitzman's argument makes sense if you want to win the North division.

I tend to agree with Kietz.  I'd rather KSU dominate the division than "be competitive" in a solid division.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

October 03, 2007, 04:34:54 PM
Reply #12

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
Kietz comparing the Big XII North to the AFC West is illogical, because you don't have to recruit in the NFL.

Perceptions and rankings DO matter in recruiting.

Did you hear the caller?

The caller was an idiot.  Keitzman's argument makes sense if you want to win the North division.

I tend to agree with Kietz.  I'd rather KSU dominate the division than "be competitive" in a solid division.

I understood both points, but to say perception and rankings don't matter at all is just factually incorrect. It matters in the long run for your team to win the division in the future due to recruiting. It just does.

I'm not saying it matters as much as that caller said, but it isn't totally irrelevant even when you're only talking about winning your division.

October 03, 2007, 05:09:09 PM
Reply #13

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
Kietz comparing the Big XII North to the AFC West is illogical, because you don't have to recruit in the NFL.

Perceptions and rankings DO matter in recruiting.

Did you hear the caller?

The caller was an idiot.  Keitzman's argument makes sense if you want to win the North division.

I tend to agree with Kietz.  I'd rather KSU dominate the division than "be competitive" in a solid division.

I understood both points, but to say perception and rankings don't matter at all is just factually incorrect. It matters in the long run for your team to win the division in the future due to recruiting. It just does.

I'm not saying it matters as much as that caller said, but it isn't totally irrelevant even when you're only talking about winning your division.

The perception of your division's relative strength matters more than winning it?  Rankings do indeed matter, but strength of schedule is a rather small part of that.

If your point is really that having your division's strength highly thought of is needed so that you can recruit so that you can then win the division, then I don't know what to tell you.  Wouldn't having a highly thought of division mean that you were competing with more schools for the same regional kids?  I'd rather have ISU, CU, MU, NU, ku all thought of as horrible, consistently dominate the division and scoop up kids from all those schools and then worry about the South in the Championship game.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

October 03, 2007, 05:24:20 PM
Reply #14

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
Just win, baby.

October 03, 2007, 06:25:05 PM
Reply #15

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers

The perception of your division's relative strength matters more than winning it?

I didn't say that. I simply said it's not completely irrelevant like Kietz said.

October 03, 2007, 06:37:00 PM
Reply #16

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW

The perception of your division's relative strength matters more than winning it?

I didn't say that. I simply said it's not completely irrelevant like Kietz said.

Would you mind explaining what you did say then because I'm looking for an argument.

Did you hear the caller that Kietz was responding to?  The context really frames all of this.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

October 03, 2007, 06:43:30 PM
Reply #17

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers

The perception of your division's relative strength matters more than winning it?

I didn't say that. I simply said it's not completely irrelevant like Kietz said.

Would you mind explaining what you did say then because I'm looking for an argument.

Did you hear the caller that Kietz was responding to?  The context really frames all of this.

Yes, I heard the caller, and no, you aren't getting an argument. Not this time.  :)