I totally agree with you that his preparation for road games has been lacks, and for some reason they can't translate that into wins. That also has nothing to do with my point of the noncon. They didnt play a noncon road game, which makes that arguement irrelevant when evaluating the noncon portion of the Kansas schedule.
I think you misunderstood my point...The target of the 'attacks' is the thought that ku has a better than 50-50 chance to win, NOT the air-filled pastry schedule. However, the twinky schedule is part of the rationale behind the 'attacks'. Other aspects for the attacks are ku's decrepid capacity to win on the road and against south division/ranked opponents. So, it's a culmination of information, of which, this year's defense-less opponents are a part, yet not the whole argument.
To view it differently, if ukan had a history of winning 30-40% of their road games and had beaten aTm, UT, OU, etc., then our attacks would be less - at least I would be much less confident about KSU winning. But since, ku is a terrible road team & they've played air, their chances at winning, IMO, are very minimal.
