Date: 16/08/25 - 19:48 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Did I hear Ian lined up at DE last night?  (Read 425 times)

September 16, 2007, 10:58:58 AM
Read 425 times

WildCatzPhreak

  • Guest
Thought I heard that somewhere.

September 16, 2007, 11:06:27 AM
Reply #1

tmramrod91

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1360
He played almost exclusively at DE.
Childs and Patterson played OLB for most of the game.
Houlick is getting better each game, really playing well right now.

September 16, 2007, 11:39:35 AM
Reply #2

WildCatzPhreak

  • Guest
He played almost exclusively at DE.
Childs and Patterson played OLB for most of the game.
Houlick is getting better each game, really playing well right now.
What did our D-Line look like?  Was it basically a 4-3?  Or did he take one of the other DE's spots?

September 16, 2007, 11:41:22 AM
Reply #3

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
I thought I heard somewhere that he always lines up as a DE in our Nickel package.

September 16, 2007, 12:23:50 PM
Reply #4

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
We ran mostly 3-4. Ian lined up at the 3-4 DE spot. Our D-Line looks really stout. LB's need to wrap up more, although some had good games. Diehl had 2 sacks in a row and looked good in limited play. Houlik looked solid as well.

September 16, 2007, 02:04:48 PM
Reply #5

tmramrod91

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1360
We ran mostly 3-4. Ian lined up at the 3-4 DE spot. Our D-Line looks really stout. LB's need to wrap up more, although some had good games. Diehl had 2 sacks in a row and looked good in limited play. Houlik looked solid as well.

Basically sums it up.
Tackling was an issue at times, but the game was out of hand already, so take it fwiw.
Losing Moore hurts at LB, but personally I'm pretty pumped at the depth at LB right now. Looks like Campbell might go back to playing a lot more DE (and I'm perfectly fine with that)