Date: 25/08/25 - 07:32 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: I totally disagree with you guys bitching about the stars.  (Read 1076 times)

June 13, 2007, 06:20:29 PM
Read 1076 times

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
We...just...aren't recruiting very well.

Every school has a hogan, or Moore. A kid that the services just miss on. They aren't singling us out (though I will say crabtree being a KSU homer is hilarious)
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 13, 2007, 06:20:58 PM
Reply #1

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
We...just...aren't recruiting very well.

Every school has a hogan, or Moore. A kid that the services just miss on. They aren't singling us out (though I will say crabtree being a KSU homer is hilarious)

Klein.

June 13, 2007, 06:24:23 PM
Reply #2

ScubaSteve

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 714
We...just...aren't recruiting very well.

Every school has a hogan, or Moore. A kid that the services just miss on. They aren't singling us out (though I will say crabtree being a KSU homer is hilarious)

Well, you're just wrong, I guess.

June 13, 2007, 06:24:49 PM
Reply #3

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
We...just...aren't recruiting very well.

Every school has a hogan, or Moore. A kid that the services just miss on. They aren't singling us out (though I will say crabtree being a KSU homer is hilarious)
I agree with Kassanavoid being a 2 star and Burris being a 2 star. However, both were ranked last night and are no longer ranked, that's &@#%ed up. Secondly, Crabby said that Klein was a mid 3 star and was better than Jack Elway just two weeks ago and now he's completely changed his tune. It's pretty lame if you ask me.

June 13, 2007, 06:25:22 PM
Reply #4

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
We...just...aren't recruiting very well.

Every school has a hogan, or Moore. A kid that the services just miss on. They aren't singling us out (though I will say crabtree being a KSU homer is hilarious)

Well, you're just wrong, I guess.

You're just frustrated. Klein's only offer was KSU.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 13, 2007, 06:31:04 PM
Reply #5

Pete

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6413
  • Personal Text
    Hicks

You're just frustrated. Klein's only offer was KSU.

That is part of the problem here.  If he had an offer from a "name" program he'd be a star higher....for that reason alone.  Rivals is lazy. 

June 13, 2007, 06:34:11 PM
Reply #6

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.

You're just frustrated. Klein's only offer was KSU.

That is part of the problem here.  If he had an offer from a "name" program he'd be a star higher....for that reason alone.  Rivals is lazy. 

isn't that how pretty much everything works in life?
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 13, 2007, 06:40:19 PM
Reply #7

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Quote
Being a Pollyanna is one thing but calling out what you see when you see it is another. We all saw those numbers last night and they are now gone. to call it a glitch is laughable.
I have been in organizations and on sports teams in leagues where we were top dog and we knew as well the advantages we had and how other were screwed around and we said nothing why? Because we liked our curren t position on top and didn't care enough to point out wrongs. We would just snicker as we got calls or whatever. Point is Until those getting bent over care enough to make some noise the status quo will continue.

QFT

June 13, 2007, 06:41:14 PM
Reply #8

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 13, 2007, 06:48:05 PM
Reply #9

stormnut

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1722
You know what piss me off is Crabby putting that stupid poll out last night to bait us like we were going to be happy with where we sit. That and his whole Klien flip flop really is pissing me off right now.


June 13, 2007, 06:58:09 PM
Reply #10

Bullfn33

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2152
The only thing that is really fishy to me is Klein.  Look at his tape and his previous ranking.  If he was on Oklahoma's list he'd be a 5.6 rated 3-star, no doubt about it.  It's all about offers.  If they have an offer from a traditional program their rating jumps regardless of what rivals sees with their own eyes.  It's completely biased.  Why? Because they have to please the large fan bases to keep them jacked about their teams and keep them paying for their subscriptions.  Follow the money trail.  That's all it is.     
Show me defense.

June 13, 2007, 07:07:12 PM
Reply #11

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2643
« Last Edit: June 13, 2007, 07:09:01 PM by PoetWarrior »

June 13, 2007, 07:11:07 PM
Reply #12

stormnut

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1722
Guys we have offered whose rating is insane:


http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=57241


http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=60297


http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=62918

If we got a commitment from Harper or Blackman I would feel like we just landed the #1 player in the country.

Yet ku's 5'8" WR from TEXAS gets a 3*. If he was a KSU commit they would give him a one star.


June 13, 2007, 07:14:44 PM
Reply #13

Bullfn33

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2152
Guys we have offered whose rating is insane:


http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=57241


http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=60297


http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=62918
Which comes first, the offers or the ratings?(not talking about 5 star players)  It's easy to grade 5 stars.  Just look and see who is an incredible athletes with skills.  After you get past the blatant 5 stars, it gets interesting with the biased ratings based mostly on offers.  I was mostly referring to the middle 50-60% with my previous comment. 
« Last Edit: June 13, 2007, 07:16:42 PM by Bullfn33 »
Show me defense.

June 13, 2007, 07:16:58 PM
Reply #14

ew2x4

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3510
  • Personal Text
    I'm with Coco.
Who all has been reviewed for rankings so far? Because I was looking at fairly similar schools (not OU, more like VaTech, TTech, etc.), and, well, we're kinda far behind. They have guys that are 3 and 4 stars. Maybe a 5 here and there. But we're averaging 2 stars. Crabby or not, those numbers need to be loads better. We can't depend on diamonds in the rough. We need solid 3 and 4 stars. period.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2007, 07:22:54 PM by ew2x4 »

June 13, 2007, 07:27:24 PM
Reply #15

chum1

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6944
Just so I can get a better picture of things, are these guys underrated to the same degree that Spexarth, Schmidt, Rooker, Handy, Hafferty, and D'Arcy were?

June 13, 2007, 07:30:02 PM
Reply #16

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Who all has been reviewed for rankings so far? Because I was looking at fairly similar schools (not OU, more like VaTech, TTech, etc.), and, well, we're kinda far behind. They have guys that are 3 and 4 stars. Maybe a 5 here and there. But we're averaging 2 stars. Crabby or not, those numbers need to be loads better. We can't depend on diamonds in the rough. We need solid 3 and 4 stars. period.
Bassett should be a high 3 star. Klein should be a mid to high 3 star. Burris should be a low 3 star. Childs being a two star is a complete joke. Blackman should be a high 3 star. Harper should be a four star. Kassanavoid is really only the crappy commitment we have.

June 13, 2007, 07:33:57 PM
Reply #17

BigXIIfan

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 318
Guys we have offered whose rating is insane:


http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=57241


http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=60297


http://kansasstate.rivals.com/viewprospect.asp?pr_key=62918

If we got a commitment from Harper or Blackman I would feel like we just landed the #1 player in the country.

IMO all three of these guys should have been five stars

June 13, 2007, 07:34:43 PM
Reply #18

stormnut

  • Premium Member
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1722
Who all has been reviewed for rankings so far? Because I was looking at fairly similar schools (not OU, more like VaTech, TTech, etc.), and, well, we're kinda far behind. They have guys that are 3 and 4 stars. Maybe a 5 here and there. But we're averaging 2 stars. Crabby or not, those numbers need to be loads better. We can't depend on diamonds in the rough. We need solid 3 and 4 stars. period.
Bassett should be a high 3 star. Klein should be a mid to high 3 star. Burris should be a low 3 star. Childs being a two star is a complete joke. Blackman should be a high 3 star. Harper should be a four star. Kassanavoid is really only the crappy commitment we have.

QFT


June 13, 2007, 07:41:22 PM
Reply #19

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2643


IMO all three of these guys should have been five stars

Don't go looney on us.

June 13, 2007, 08:00:53 PM
Reply #20

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

June 13, 2007, 08:04:52 PM
Reply #21

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 13, 2007, 08:13:33 PM
Reply #22

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc

June 13, 2007, 08:19:05 PM
Reply #23

Sandman

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 377
Who all has been reviewed for rankings so far? Because I was looking at fairly similar schools (not OU, more like VaTech, TTech, etc.), and, well, we're kinda far behind. They have guys that are 3 and 4 stars. Maybe a 5 here and there. But we're averaging 2 stars. Crabby or not, those numbers need to be loads better. We can't depend on diamonds in the rough. We need solid 3 and 4 stars. period.
Bassett should be a high 3 star. Klein should be a mid to high 3 star. Burris should be a low 3 star. Childs being a two star is a complete joke. Blackman should be a high 3 star. Harper should be a four star. Kassanavoid is really only the crappy commitment we have.

This is what I don't understand, what makes you all think that you all are better suited to rank these players than those who do it for a living?  Do you think they're rating them lower than they should be rated just to get under your skin?

June 13, 2007, 08:46:44 PM
Reply #24

The Manhatter

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2572
only thing that ticked me off was Crabby telling everyone AFTER seeing Klein in person and AFTER seeing his video..."he's a mid 3-star"...and then in the last 11 days when nothing has happened he drops?  LOL.

And the Harper ranking is stupid.

Other than that...no big deal.


June 13, 2007, 08:49:29 PM
Reply #25

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
For every stupid ranking against us there is one for us.

Relax. This season will tell alot about Prince's 06 recruits.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

June 13, 2007, 08:58:28 PM
Reply #26

The Manhatter

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2572
For every stupid ranking against us there is one for us.


let me know when we get the one offer-4 star like the beaks have been handed the past two years.  LOL.


June 13, 2007, 09:18:40 PM
Reply #27

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Who all has been reviewed for rankings so far? Because I was looking at fairly similar schools (not OU, more like VaTech, TTech, etc.), and, well, we're kinda far behind. They have guys that are 3 and 4 stars. Maybe a 5 here and there. But we're averaging 2 stars. Crabby or not, those numbers need to be loads better. We can't depend on diamonds in the rough. We need solid 3 and 4 stars. period.
Bassett should be a high 3 star. Klein should be a mid to high 3 star. Burris should be a low 3 star. Childs being a two star is a complete joke. Blackman should be a high 3 star. Harper should be a four star. Kassanavoid is really only the crappy commitment we have.

This is what I don't understand, what makes you all think that you all are better suited to rank these players than those who do it for a living?  Do you think they're rating them lower than they should be rated just to get under your skin?
Do you think Rivals is better at evaluating talent than college coaches? If you really meant what you said then there is no reason you should go off of Rivals' rankings either. I'm going off of offers/interest from big schools and what Crabtree said eleven days ago. It doesn't take that much intelligence to be able to determine that Childs should be above a 2 star and that Harper is a 4 star.

June 14, 2007, 07:02:18 AM
Reply #28

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
We...just...aren't recruiting very well.

Every school has a hogan, or Moore. A kid that the services just miss on. They aren't singling us out (though I will say crabtree being a KSU homer is hilarious)

I don't think it has dawned on some that maybe, just maybe, our current commits suck. 
« Last Edit: June 14, 2007, 08:17:43 AM by catzacker »

June 14, 2007, 07:50:53 AM
Reply #29

~WabashRoll~

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1964
Crazy thought.  Maybe if we want players with more stars we should be recruiting better players?



"Just a general question...Anyone else think Brian Smoller sounds like Bob Costas? I've told him that for years and he never believes me". - D. Scott Fritchen