Date: 29/07/25 - 15:19 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Big difference in recruiting this year  (Read 978 times)

May 01, 2007, 09:37:38 AM
Read 978 times

cireksu

  • Guest
marginal players like kirk and freeze are not getting early offers.

May 01, 2007, 09:42:06 AM
Reply #1

Poopley

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1103
  • Personal Text
    rokkar stokkar
The Liberty coach must have some photos of Prince getting a blowjob from J Edgar Hoover or something. Why Why Why did he offer those 2 so early?!

May 01, 2007, 09:44:20 AM
Reply #2

KSUIntegrity22

  • Guest
He didn't think we'd been Texas  :eyeseeyou:

EDIT:
By been I meant beat...  :flush:
« Last Edit: May 01, 2007, 09:52:18 AM by KSUIntegrity22 »

May 01, 2007, 09:53:27 AM
Reply #3

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
The recruiting strategy has shifted a bit this year.  The staff knows that this class is extremely important to the future (and their jobs).

May 01, 2007, 11:07:51 AM
Reply #4

Arthur Carlson

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 265
The recruiting strategy has shifted a bit this year.  The staff knows that this class is extremely important to the future (and their jobs).

I get that.  The question is...why didn't they have this same philosophy last year?  Every class is important.  This isn't basketball, where you can 'pull a Roy' every now and again.  Especially in the trenches.  Heaven knows we haven't controlled the line of scrimmage consistently since 2003.
As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.

May 01, 2007, 11:17:25 AM
Reply #5

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
We seem to have offerred what appears to be a lot of talented guys...so if that's their strategy this year, I say bravo. 


May 01, 2007, 11:19:01 AM
Reply #6

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
The recruiting strategy has shifted a bit this year.  The staff knows that this class is extremely important to the future (and their jobs).

I get that.  The question is...why didn't they have this same philosophy last year?  Every class is important.  This isn't basketball, where you can 'pull a Roy' every now and again.  Especially in the trenches.  Heaven knows we haven't controlled the line of scrimmage consistently since 2003.

I think last year was different b/c we didn't have quite the relationships with kids to bring them to KSU so we took some more chances and offered a wider swath of players.  Plus we probably learned some lessons by offering some kids early that we probably shouldn't have.  I think they are also seeing the value of showing interest but waiting on some kids to see how they do their SR seasons, both good and bad.  This year I think we're simply being more selective in our offers.

May 01, 2007, 11:51:08 AM
Reply #7

Arthur Carlson

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 265
Quote
I think last year was different b/c we didn't have quite the relationships with kids to bring them to KSU so we took some more chances and offered a wider swath of players.  Plus we probably learned some lessons by offering some kids early that we probably shouldn't have.  I think they are also seeing the value of showing interest but waiting on some kids to see how they do their SR seasons, both good and bad.  This year I think we're simply being more selective in our offers.

That makes sense.  For as much of a plan as Prince was reported to have had coming into this thing, this strategy seemed to lack some focus.  At least he appears to be learning from his mistakes.  That is encouraging.
As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.

May 01, 2007, 12:15:54 PM
Reply #8

cireksu

  • Guest
The recruiting strategy has shifted a bit this year.  The staff knows that this class is extremely important to the future (and their jobs).

I get that.  The question is...why didn't they have this same philosophy last year?  Every class is important.  This isn't basketball, where you can 'pull a Roy' every now and again.  Especially in the trenches.  Heaven knows we haven't controlled the line of scrimmage consistently since 2003.

At any level when you are trying to rebuild a football team the one thing you need is players, players, and more players, with no connections they went local and went for speed and athleticism, which was probably the one thing that they decided they could improve right away.

May 01, 2007, 01:25:13 PM
Reply #9

Poopley

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1103
  • Personal Text
    rokkar stokkar
"They went for speed and athleticism" . . . um, the two Liberty kids have neither. Their nicknames were "gootub" and "dorktard."


May 02, 2007, 02:05:17 AM
Reply #10

Leyton

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1757
"They went for speed and athleticism" . . . um, the two Liberty kids have neither. Their nicknames were "gootub" and "dorktard."



Holy crap, dude.  They weren't highly recruited (by any stretch of the imagination), but that doesn't mean that you can treat them like they are subhuman.  Loser.

May 02, 2007, 05:14:52 AM
Reply #11

Poopley

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1103
  • Personal Text
    rokkar stokkar
Yes, I am a loser, and I made similar evil remarks about Derek Marso, and before that Andy Eby and John Robertson when we signed them. They all turned into eventual average to better-than-average starters. But at signing, I just could NOT imagine any of them doing more than sitting the bench. Same for Vlad Faustin, but you could understand why they signed him since he is such a cool kid and it was a position of big-time need where everyone else had turned us down. Maybe Kirk & Freeze will work out the same way. Virginia fans said over and over that Prince will always sign some kid that you're sure we'll be a flop, and by his junior year he'll be starting on the OL and doing well. I could see that happening here and hope it does.


May 02, 2007, 05:41:44 AM
Reply #12

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan

May 03, 2007, 02:06:28 AM
Reply #13

Leyton

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1757
Yes, I am a loser, and I made similar evil remarks about Derek Marso, and before that Andy Eby and John Robertson when we signed them. They all turned into eventual average to better-than-average starters. But at signing, I just could NOT imagine any of them doing more than sitting the bench. Same for Vlad Faustin, but you could understand why they signed him since he is such a cool kid and it was a position of big-time need where everyone else had turned us down. Maybe Kirk & Freeze will work out the same way. Virginia fans said over and over that Prince will always sign some kid that you're sure we'll be a flop, and by his junior year he'll be starting on the OL and doing well. I could see that happening here and hope it does.



No worries, dude.  We're all winners.  :thumbsup:  I just felt like being an ass at the time.   :beerchug:

May 03, 2007, 06:42:55 AM
Reply #14

cocomonkey

  • Guest
unless there is a good deal of attrition there are quite a few less scholies this year.

GOCATS!!!