"Prepare for greatness"

[fatty fat fat]

http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/video.asp?section=fbrecruit&vidtype=amp&vidid=2437

[pufizzle]

Do you Mike.....do you. 

And the more I see and read about Sutton the more excited I get

[fatty fat fat]

how about that d-sutton slam?

 

[StayOutOfTrees]

That's a beautiful video. 

[tmramrod91]

p.s. d-sutton is really good
Amazing that a guy of his caliber isn't hardly even being talked about coming to ksu....awesome

[PurplePowerhouse]

I've been excited about Sutton for a long time.  That vid just gets me MORE amped for his arrival. 

[michigancat]

14588 was really talking Sutton up in between his allegations of recruiting violations.

[michigancat]

OMFG that Beasley drive/dunk was awesome.

[fatty fat fat]

remember when we all thought scout had better hoops coverage?

scout blows.

[michigancat]

remember when we all thought scout had better hoops coverage?

scout blows.

Really, scout is still better if it's someone not committed to KSU.  KSU fans just don't care about BB recruiting.

[fatty fat fat]

remember when we all thought scout had better hoops coverage?

scout blows.

Really, scout is still better if it's someone not committed to KSU.  KSU fans just don't care about BB recruiting.

scout national premium "hoops board" blows

rivals is kinda active.

bossi just hangs out in the phog premium, so we never hear his crap.

[yosh]

how about that d-sutton slam?

 

Was that Tyrel Reed he was dunking on?

[ksuno1stunner]

I think rivals will rate them one more time.  IMO Sutton should jump up to the 60-70 range.  Beasley should remain #1.  ( <---Step back and say that to yourself.  KSU is getting the #1 player in the nation.  At times, we seem to forget how rare and awesome that is)

I wonder what the RSCI rankings should be now.  I'm not sure if most of the rankings it uses has been updated enough.

[r witt]

Rivals bball is a lot better and overall a better network.  Their websites are organized better and don't seem as cheap.  Plus, (at least for K-State) recruiting is covered better by rivals.

[The Minister]

How many games next year will we actually have the 4 best players in the game, hands down?

Beaz, Walker, Hoskins, Sutton.  To that I say Sweet Sassy Molassee.

[WildCatzPhreak]

We're going to have a good frontcourt.  FINALLY.

Between Beasley, Walker, Sutton, and Hoskins...Three on the court, and one on the bench so that we won't lose a whole lot if one gets in foul trouble.

If you're going to put the best five players on the court, it's hard to argue that group of four isn't in our top 5.

[ksuno1stunner]

We're going to have a good frontcourt.  FINALLY.

Between Beasley, Walker, Sutton, and Hoskins...Three on the court, and one on the bench so that we won't lose a whole lot if one gets in foul trouble.

If you're going to put the best five players on the court, it's hard to argue that group of four isn't in our top 5.

Unfortunately they are 6'8'', 6'5'', 6'4'', and 6'4''.

We really need some height.

[Super Nintendo Chalmers]

Does Beasley think if KSU as family?

FAMILY FIRST!

 

[WildCatzPhreak]

We're going to have a good frontcourt.  FINALLY.

Between Beasley, Walker, Sutton, and Hoskins...Three on the court, and one on the bench so that we won't lose a whole lot if one gets in foul trouble.

If you're going to put the best five players on the court, it's hard to argue that group of four isn't in our top 5.

Unfortunately they are 6'8'', 6'5'', 6'4'', and 6'4''.

We really need some height.

Yeah.  That sucks.  But we had height.  (Bennett.)  It didn't work out too well.  I'll stick with shorter guys that actually have basketball skills.

If we ever desperately need a center, Colon's a good body to put in there.  He's slow and lacks an offensive skillset, but he's not going to back down to anyone.

[coitus]

darren kent.

[michigancat]

We're going to have a good frontcourt.  FINALLY.

Between Beasley, Walker, Sutton, and Hoskins...Three on the court, and one on the bench so that we won't lose a whole lot if one gets in foul trouble.

If you're going to put the best five players on the court, it's hard to argue that group of four isn't in our top 5.

Unfortunately they are 6'8'', 6'5'', 6'4'', and 6'4''.

We really need some height.

That's not much shorter than most starting front lines in the Big XII these days.

[yosh]

We're going to have a good frontcourt.  FINALLY.

Between Beasley, Walker, Sutton, and Hoskins...Three on the court, and one on the bench so that we won't lose a whole lot if one gets in foul trouble.

If you're going to put the best five players on the court, it's hard to argue that group of four isn't in our top 5.

Unfortunately they are 6'8'', 6'5'', 6'4'', and 6'4''.

We really need some height.

Are you shaving an inch off of all them to make the team seem smaller, or are you just assuming the SID is giving them an extra inch to make the team seem taller?

[ksuno1stunner]

We're going to have a good frontcourt.  FINALLY.

Between Beasley, Walker, Sutton, and Hoskins...Three on the court, and one on the bench so that we won't lose a whole lot if one gets in foul trouble.

If you're going to put the best five players on the court, it's hard to argue that group of four isn't in our top 5.

Unfortunately they are 6'8'', 6'5'', 6'4'', and 6'4''.

We really need some height.

Are you shaving an inch off of all them to make the team seem smaller, or are you just assuming the SID is giving them an extra inch to make the team seem taller?