Date: 16/08/25 - 20:20 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Practice Report...  (Read 1965 times)

April 03, 2006, 09:04:53 AM
Read 1965 times

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
1st, a couple of disclaimers; you are not going to get a run down of every position here.  Its impossible to watch every position and make any kind of judgement in a 2 hour practice (of which about 45 minutes was true scrimmage time) unless you film it and can go back and analyze both sides of the ball.  My focus was on the offensive formations/schemes and the running back position.  I really didn't pay attention to the defense.  Also realize the offense we saw saturday was maybe 1/20th of the entire offense b/c its still early in the spring and I would guess its the most "guarded" practice since its the one open to the general public and possibly could be scouted.

Formation-wise, we saw some of the same 1 back 3 WR sets that we've seen in the past, though the alignment of the RB was slightly different.  This was by far the most widely used formation and we were fairly balanced out of it with our running game and passing game.  The focus was on two running plays and a few pass route combinations attacking our cover 2 zone.  We ran the ball with a stretch off tackle play that is completely new for K-State and an inside zone play between the tackles.  We have a solid backfield IMO with Alsup, Clayton, and Fisher and Alsup looks as quick as he has since he was a frosh.  Their was a defensive emphasis on stripping the ball and our backs did a nice job of hanging onto the football.  We also utilized a 1 back, 2 TE, 2 WR set which we have used some in the past, mainly with bigger backs; last year with Mann, then in the past with guys like Saba and Joe Hall, though now we used our tailbacks out of that look.  Finally we used some 2 back looks, mainly split backs (much of the time with 2 TBs) with 2 WRs.  There were a couple of plays we ran out of the I, which has been a staple the last few years under Snyder.  Every time we ran split backs we threw the ball. 

Our passing combintions were a lot of zone flood routes using 3 WRs to one side at different depths.  At times, especially out of 2 TE, we would flood the deep hashes and the short hashes and look to the TE or RB in the middle of the field.  Throwing to the TE was definately an emphasis for the day.  No WR really stuck out either positively or negatively IMO. 

I thought our top 3 RBs all had some positive moments and we have a pretty skilled and deep backfield.  McNeese stuck out the most at FB, though we didn't use FBs much on the day.  Norwood and Alstatt were the leading recievers.  QBs rotated a lot and I didn't really notice one sticking out a lot, though again I was focusing the backs so I didn't pay particular attention to who was in and who looked the best overall.

The highlight of the day was probably the 5 (offense) on 3 (defense) box drill at the end of practice.  The offense was placed at the end of a 10 yard by 7 yard box and given 3 plays to score with a simple handoff from a QB to a RB.  Definately an emphasis here on competition and enthusiasm as evidenced by our trash talking offensive and defensive coordinators during the drill.  For those folks that like the "fiery" coaches, Raheem Morris is definately going to be a favorite.

April 03, 2006, 09:32:33 AM
Reply #1

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Good report...

Quote
For those folks that like the "fiery" coaches, Raheem Morris is definately going to be a favorite.

I guarantee that if the defense isn't good, people will hate his "fire" and want him to be more business-like.


I'm glad to see throwing to the TE is emphasized.

April 03, 2006, 09:35:37 AM
Reply #2

Saulbadguy

  • Guest
I went to the practice for all of 10 minutes.  Too boring. :( 

April 03, 2006, 09:47:56 AM
Reply #3

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
We will see the TE utilized a lot more and even throwing to the backs.  Those are staples of the WCO, and something I'm glad to see as well. 

I would imagine as we went to a more option and QB running game focused offense Coach Snyder went away from the TE more and more b/c the running game aspects of the offense added a lot more to the plate of the QB as far as decision making, so the use of the short passing game to the TE got throw out.  Plus, our running QBs weren't always super accurate throwers and there is a good chance that if you're off a bit throwing into the middle of the field your going to get a pick, whereas if you're throwing down the field or a quick pass to the boundry an errant pass will go over everyone's head or out of bounds. 

Saturday we saw zero instances of QB running game, so it makes sense that the short passing game in tight quarters will be a point of emphasis in our new look offense.

IMO, there was way too much going on to be bored saturday, but I'm a FB nerd.  I enjoyed watching the different drills and teaching technique of the new coaches.  Much of the time I'm just watching how coaches coach to be honest.

April 03, 2006, 10:14:45 AM
Reply #4

Zappa Cat

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 200
Thanks Fan,


Nice job!


April 03, 2006, 10:22:21 AM
Reply #5

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
From what I have been reading, I'm not surprised they are taking this route.

It makes good sense to get this formation set into play early so that everyone can get up to game speed.  Prince is known for his emphasis on speed, and the only way to do that is to take some of the more fundamental formations, and have them learn them and then add speed. I like where this is heading, it's a good solid approach to fundamental football.

Offense, however, has been the stronger element on our team.  I'm more concerned about how strong the defense is. 

April 03, 2006, 11:02:07 AM
Reply #6

jeffy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 7000
  • Personal Text
    ku Swallows
Is this going to be the "Swiing pass and a cloud of dust" offense?  *wince*

April 03, 2006, 11:16:27 AM
Reply #7

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
If we throw some swing passes and are still able to move the football and score I'm fine.  And as long as we don't throw it out of our own endzone.

April 03, 2006, 11:17:34 AM
Reply #8

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
If we throw some swing passes and are still able to move the football and score I'm fine.  And as long as we don't throw it out of our own endzone.

That has been officially named the Callahan-Taylor Maneuver.   It's always worth 2 points.

April 05, 2006, 08:35:13 AM
Reply #9

KSt8er

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1550
  • Personal Text
    AAAAAHHHHH AAAAHHH
David Allen and Darren Sproles would have made it worth 6.

thanks for the look into practice ksu_FAN.  Being out of town I have to rely solely on you guys and its nice to get a knowledgeable perspective.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2006, 08:37:50 AM by KSt8er »
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." -- Sir Winston Churchill