Date: 13/08/25 - 17:54 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: 2 TE set  (Read 411 times)

August 21, 2007, 07:51:30 AM
Read 411 times

Fledermaus

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 395
What do you think about the 2 TE set that we often use?  I'm not a fan of 2 TEs, esp. without a dominating front 5 on the o-line.  It seems to me that using a FB would be a better for picking up penetration through our line, and would help out the rushing attack a lot more.   IMO, Norwood was a terrible blocker, so adding an extra WR would also have been an improvement over 2 TEs.  I know we don't have a true FB right now, but what do you think of the different approaches?


August 21, 2007, 08:05:16 AM
Reply #1

PurplePowerhouse

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 853
  • Personal Text
    Overkill. It works.
I hate not utiizing a fullback.  Of course, I'm not a huge fan of Prince's offensive schemes anyway.  WCO =  :sleep:

August 21, 2007, 09:51:06 AM
Reply #2

cas

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6856
  • Personal Text
    Sniff Sniff. . . I smell Heisman.
I hate not utiizing a fullback.  Of course, I'm not a huge fan of Prince's offensive schemes anyway.  WCO =  :sleep:

Victor Mann would be dominant this season.
csourk is the best pre-college poster on this board.  way better than oxlp956

August 21, 2007, 11:07:12 AM
Reply #3

Poopley

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1103
  • Personal Text
    rokkar stokkar
Standing still, Victor Mann always looked like he was about to tip over.  :eek:

August 21, 2007, 11:26:42 AM
Reply #4

KSU4ME

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 2317
1999 we used the 2 TE set with both FB and RB quite a bit.  Just let Beasley stand there until Morgan got open.

Boring as heck, but worked.
"Mel Kiper, THE TURD"