KSUFans Archives

Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: KITNfury on October 20, 2009, 02:05:59 PM

Title: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: KITNfury on October 20, 2009, 02:05:59 PM
I wanna do one too.

What if KSU and ISU are the only North winners this weekend?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Purple_PhotoShopper on October 20, 2009, 02:09:58 PM
I wanna do one too.

What if KSU and ISU are the only North winners this weekend?

Here's what I would do: Get my vasectomy reversed. Impregnate my wife. Name the baby Bill Snyder no matter the gender. Then 10 years from now, I would order my child to go kick the asses of those two ku named kids, Manning and Reesing, over in Lawrence.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Bullfn33 on October 20, 2009, 02:13:50 PM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: KITNfury on October 20, 2009, 02:16:46 PM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.
The EMAW explosion in my pants would not be able to be contained, nor cleaned.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: mrfreddio55 on October 20, 2009, 02:24:44 PM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.

JFC. I can't even imagine.  :love:  :eek:
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 20, 2009, 02:29:08 PM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.
The EMAW explosion in my pants would not be able to be contained, nor cleaned.

That is somehow the most wonderful and disgusting reply I have ever read.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Jmo on October 20, 2009, 02:41:03 PM
I would have to duct tape my EMAWboner up to be able to go to work all next week.   :ksu:  :kstatriot:
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: vanro03 on October 20, 2009, 03:13:08 PM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.

This is funny. Counting them chickens a little soon aren't you..
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: KITNfury on October 20, 2009, 03:15:27 PM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.

This is funny. Counting them chickens a little soon aren't you..
Actually, this would be the result of all the favorites winning outside of NU. It's well within the realm of possibility.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: vanro03 on October 20, 2009, 03:22:35 PM
(http://i.treehugger.com/images/2007/5/24/flying%20pigs.jpg)
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Bullfn33 on October 20, 2009, 03:23:08 PM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.

This is funny. Counting them chickens a little soon aren't you..

never said this was going to happen. We are playing the what if(see thread title); the only upset that needs to happen is ISU over NU so it's not even a far fetched what if.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: viper020509 on October 20, 2009, 03:56:19 PM
Or what if we only lose to OU the rest of the season, go to the Big 12 Championship and upset Colt McCoy and Texas again!!!!
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: KITNfury on October 20, 2009, 04:12:49 PM
Or what if we only lose to OU the rest of the season, go to the Big 12 Championship and upset Colt McCoy and Texas again!!!!
Do better.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: vanro03 on October 20, 2009, 04:22:07 PM
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
You boys are smoking a little too much crack this week...
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: GoodForAnother on October 20, 2009, 05:52:05 PM
The three biggest preseason favorites would then be in 4th, 5th and 6th, with the three perceived preseason weakest teams in 1st, 2nd and 3rd.

Would be hilarious.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: wiley03 on October 20, 2009, 06:00:19 PM
Big 12 north would be the laughing stock of the nation...it would be epic meltdown for bottom 3 teams if that were to take place. :ohno:

then we wake up sunday morning an laugh at this prediction as we frack it away.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on October 20, 2009, 06:08:09 PM
The big 12 north already is the laughing stock of the nation.  Put these teams in any other division/conference and you have a bunch of bottom feeders.

And vanro, your little heart episode should have been a wakeup call to lay off the Kentucky Gentleman.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: cas on October 20, 2009, 06:28:04 PM
here's a what if.

what if nebraska actually scores more than one touchdown this week?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: QuinnMac on October 20, 2009, 08:23:56 PM
here's a what if.

what if nebraska actually scores more than one touchdown this week?
:yikes:
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Ben Ji 2.0 on October 20, 2009, 08:51:35 PM
No need to play what if's. Just think about how Texas feels looking up at the North standings....

They have to be crapping themselves thinking about having to play their chisholm trail rivals for a shot at the national title.....
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: B12Supplement on October 20, 2009, 09:48:36 PM
It would pretty much show what kind of fruit pie wet wipes populate this board.  Two weeks everyone was on here setting fire to their pubic hair and crying about how "We suck!  We suck!  Old Balls was a mistake!  If only we'd gotten Patterson or a real coach!"  Then, if the above senario happend, you'd be all:  "We're the greatest!  Snyder [I notice 'Old Balls" has become scarce in this board] is Jesus!"

You guys are worse than chicks.  "Come here!  Get away!  Come here!  Get away!"

And you make fun of our fans.  At least when we bail we go all the way.  We don't bail with one foot in the door and then go around pretending we were "right behind this team all along" like you chumps.

Oh, and don't count on the above scenario.  KSU loses to CU.  ku beats OU.  Order is restored.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: royalswild on October 21, 2009, 12:07:56 AM
It would pretty much show what kind of fruit pie wet wipes populate this board.  Two weeks everyone was on here setting fire to their pubic hair and crying about how "We suck!  We suck!  Old Balls was a mistake!  If only we'd gotten Patterson or a real coach!"  Then, if the above senario happend, you'd be all:  "We're the greatest!  Snyder [I notice 'Old Balls" has become scarce in this board] is Jesus!"

You guys are worse than chicks.  "Come here!  Get away!  Come here!  Get away!"

And you make fun of our fans.  At least when we bail we go all the way.  We don't bail with one foot in the door and then go around pretending we were "right behind this team all along" like you chumps.

Oh, and don't count on the above scenario.  KSU loses to CU.  ku beats OU.  Order is restored.

Snyder is going to beat Colorado, so just get off this board and head back over to the phag.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: hemmy on October 21, 2009, 12:11:51 AM
It would pretty much show what kind of fruit pie wet wipes populate this board.  Two weeks everyone was on here setting fire to their pubic hair and crying about how "We suck!  We suck!  Old Balls was a mistake!  If only we'd gotten Patterson or a real coach!"  Then, if the above senario happend, you'd be all:  "We're the greatest!  Snyder [I notice 'Old Balls" has become scarce in this board] is Jesus!"

You guys are worse than chicks.  "Come here!  Get away!  Come here!  Get away!"

And you make fun of our fans.  At least when we bail we go all the way.  We don't bail with one foot in the door and then go around pretending we were "right behind this team all along" like you chumps.

Oh, and don't count on the above scenario.  KSU loses to CU.  ku beats OU.  Order is restored.


pfffffffffffft
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: FHSU92 on October 21, 2009, 12:37:06 AM
It would pretty much show what kind of fruit pie wet wipes populate this board.  Two weeks everyone was on here setting fire to their pubic hair and crying about how "We suck!  We suck!  Old Balls was a mistake!  If only we'd gotten Patterson or a real coach!"  Then, if the above senario happend, you'd be all:  "We're the greatest!  Snyder [I notice 'Old Balls" has become scarce in this board] is Jesus!"

You guys are worse than chicks.  "Come here!  Get away!  Come here!  Get away!"

And you make fun of our fans.  At least when we bail we go all the way.  We don't bail with one foot in the door and then go around pretending we were "right behind this team all along" like you chumps.

Oh, and don't count on the above scenario.  KSU loses to CU.  ku beats OU.  Order is restored.


How does being 1st in the North change that?  We just suck less then everyone else.  I still contend that K-State sux, just so happens that applies to the B12 (north especially and most of the south).

c'mon we now have a QB playing WR and a TE on the D-line, only sucky programs have to fill gaps like that. We were lucky the ISU game didn't go OT and had our clox cleaned by Tek.

So, I guess what you've misunderstood is that we're extactic for where we are given how sucky we are.  I think it's obvious that those programs that were slated to finish higher than ISU & KSU are now realizing they are just as sucky (if not more?).
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: FelixRex on October 21, 2009, 05:52:44 AM
here's a what if.

what if nebraska actually scores more than one touchdown this week?

(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
You boys are smoking a little too much crack this week...
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: KITNfury on October 21, 2009, 05:58:32 AM
I know we suck, which is why it would be so deliciously awesome if were running away with the division.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Bookcat on October 22, 2009, 10:34:46 PM
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
You boys are smoking a little too much crack this week...

is it that far fetched to predict that Nebraska just might lay an egg vs. a dangerous Iowa State team? Oh how I hope this happens.!!!  :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Haverhill on October 23, 2009, 03:49:19 PM
I like the scenario but I don't see Iowa State breaking it's long losing streak in Lincoln this weekend.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: FBWillie on October 23, 2009, 08:47:12 PM
I like the scenario but I don't see Iowa State breaking it's long losing streak in Lincoln this weekend.

Thoughts become things Haver,   You have to KNOW ISU is going to win.   The universe is listening - are you asking for your dreams to be reality?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Perry on October 24, 2009, 06:40:24 AM
I like the scenario but I don't see Iowa State breaking it's long losing streak in Lincoln this weekend.

Thoughts become things Haver,   You have to KNOW ISU is going to win.   The universe is listening - are you asking for your dreams to be reality?

What if a Nubflake is asking the universe for a Nubb win? How does the universe decide?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Guscat on October 24, 2009, 06:53:02 AM
It would pretty much show what kind of fruit pie wet wipes populate this board.  Two weeks everyone was on here setting fire to their pubic hair and crying about how "We suck!  We suck!  Old Balls was a mistake!  If only we'd gotten Patterson or a real coach!"  Then, if the above senario happend, you'd be all:  "We're the greatest!  Snyder [I notice 'Old Balls" has become scarce in this board] is Jesus!"

You guys are worse than chicks.  "Come here!  Get away!  Come here!  Get away!"

And you make fun of our fans.  At least when we bail we go all the way.  We don't bail with one foot in the door and then go around pretending we were "right behind this team all along" like you chumps.

Oh, and don't count on the above scenario.  KSU loses to CU.  ku beats OU.  Order is restored.


1.  The 'Cats have not given us reason to NOT prepare for this outcome.
2.  I don't know what type of "order" is being referred to here.  Perhaps you live in some bizarre, alternative universe where teams with a .300 and some change conference record belong at the top of the conference, and teams with .600+ conference records belong at the bottom. 
3.  Your reference to "fruit pie wet wipes" is entirely misplaced.   Every true Kansan recognizes that reference to residents of Lawrence and fans of ku.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: FBWillie on October 24, 2009, 07:09:08 AM
I like the scenario but I don't see Iowa State breaking it's long losing streak in Lincoln this weekend.

Thoughts become things Haver,   You have to KNOW ISU is going to win.   The universe is listening - are you asking for your dreams to be reality?

What if a Nubflake is asking the universe for a Nubb win? How does the universe decide?

The universe is very mysterious.   Maybe it has a magic 8 ball.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Kat Kid on October 24, 2009, 02:51:06 PM
BUMP!
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Bookie Pimp on October 24, 2009, 03:11:55 PM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.

This is funny. Counting them chickens a little soon aren't you..


 :tongue:
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: JTKSU on October 24, 2009, 04:07:02 PM
I think someone needs to explain to the uk fan (and Nubb fans in general) what "order restored" actually means.  Seems like the seem to be using it incorrectly a lot lately.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Dirty Sanchez on October 24, 2009, 09:17:01 PM
Nomination for thread of the week/month/year. 


Hey, Purple Photoshopper--better tell your wife to make like margarine and spread.  Make Baby Bill.

vanro?  hello?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: mjrod on October 24, 2009, 09:22:15 PM
Vanro...

You're not gonna believe this..

I saw a havelina with wings fly by my window.

No crap...
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Big Sam on October 24, 2009, 09:28:26 PM
Vanro...

You're not gonna believe this..

I saw a havelina with wings fly by my window.

No crap...


 :eek: :thumbsup: :koolaid:
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Bookcat on October 24, 2009, 09:28:48 PM
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
You boys are smoking a little too much crack this week...

is it that far fetched to predict that Nebraska just might lay an egg vs. a dangerous Iowa State team? Oh how I hope this happens.!!!  :lol: :lol:


bump.

told ya. NU just plain sux.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: FHSU92 on October 24, 2009, 09:35:41 PM
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
You boys are smoking a little too much crack this week...

is it that far fetched to predict that Nebraska just might lay an egg vs. a dangerous Iowa State team? Oh how I hope this happens.!!!  :lol: :lol:


bump.

told ya. NU just plain sux.

Not so fast, they held ISU to 9 pts.  The Black Shirts be back!!1!1!!
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: mcmwcat on October 24, 2009, 09:37:10 PM
what if every North team won their remaining home games against their fellow Northerners?

and Nub loses to OU?

  :ohno:
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: ReggieSinglegur on October 24, 2009, 09:40:13 PM
what if every North team won their remaining home games against their fellow Northerners?

and Nub loses to OU?

  :ohno:

Who do you consider the Home team in the ku-MU Battle Royale?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: mcmwcat on October 24, 2009, 09:54:31 PM
what if every North team won their remaining home games against their fellow Northerners?

and Nub loses to OU?

  :ohno:

Who do you consider the Home team in the ku-MU Battle Royale?

that game would be insignificant in this scenario
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: ReggieSinglegur on October 24, 2009, 09:56:41 PM
what if every North team won their remaining home games against their fellow Northerners?

and Nub loses to OU?

  :ohno:

Who do you consider the Home team in the ku-MU Battle Royale?

that game would be insignificant in this scenario

Can you imagine how emty arrowhead would be in that scenario? if the weather is bad, they may have less than 30K.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Doug Heffernan on October 24, 2009, 10:00:20 PM
Bump...this thread really just needs to be pinned at the top.  Definately has my vote for thread of the month/year literally laughed out loud and got a funny look from the wife because of Steve Dave's remark.  Purple Photoshopper =  :tongue: right now
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Bookcat on October 24, 2009, 10:11:42 PM
What if we win in Lincoln?

Would it really be an upset?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Haverhill on October 24, 2009, 10:18:16 PM
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
You boys are smoking a little too much crack this week...

is it that far fetched to predict that Nebraska just might lay an egg vs. a dangerous Iowa State team? Oh how I hope this happens.!!!  :lol: :lol:


bump.

told ya. NU just plain sux.

Yep, they lost to a Redshirt Freshmen QB in his first collegiate start. They lost to a team where their starting QB and nationally recognized RB were sitting on the bench. They lost to a team they havn't lost to at home since 1977. Yikes, Nebraska is down and I love it!
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Cole on October 24, 2009, 11:22:35 PM
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
You boys are smoking a little too much crack this week...

is it that far fetched to predict that Nebraska just might lay an egg vs. a dangerous Iowa State team? Oh how I hope this happens.!!!  :lol: :lol:


bump.

told ya. NU just plain sux.

Yep, they lost to a Redshirt Freshmen QB in his first collegiate start. They lost to a team where their starting QB and nationally recognized RB were sitting on the bench. They lost to a team they havn't lost to at home since 1977. Yikes, Nebraska is down and I love it!

holy frank. i knew there were questions of them playing or not, but i just figured iowa state won with their starters. Ha i love when K-State wins and ku, and Nebraska lose.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Cole on October 24, 2009, 11:29:41 PM
what if we go 6-6 (4-4) and win the north. do we get a bowl game? or what would happen?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: kcchiefdav on October 25, 2009, 12:03:56 AM
what if we go 6-6 (4-4) and win the north. do we get a bowl game? or what would happen?


We'd get blown up by UT and go home for the winter with a satisfying 6-7 record.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Bullfn33 on October 25, 2009, 12:10:40 AM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.

This is funny. Counting them chickens a little soon aren't you..

:fiesta: :lol: :nahnah: :users:

 :piratewave:
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: wildcatfan79 on October 25, 2009, 02:34:55 AM
So, will we still be underdogs Nov. 7 when the  :ku: come limping into town with a 1-3 conference record? Ya Think?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Super PurpleCat on October 25, 2009, 03:00:25 AM
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/123/jiminycricket.gif)

Dreams do come true after all.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: JTKSU on October 25, 2009, 03:04:34 AM
So, will we still be underdogs Nov. 7 when the  :ku: come limping into town with a 1-3 conference record? Ya Think?

If OU takes us behind the woodshed, Ol Yeller style, yes.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: Fledermaus on October 25, 2009, 08:28:09 AM
what if we go 6-6 (4-4) and win the north. do we get a bowl game? or what would happen?


I was just thinking through this.  Could win division and not qualify for a bowl.

IF we qualify for a bowl game, then by extension we will have won the north?  No scenario that we could get bowl eligible and not also win the division, right?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: steve dave on October 25, 2009, 08:35:52 AM
what if we go 6-6 (4-4) and win the north. do we get a bowl game? or what would happen?


I was just thinking through this.  Could win division and not qualify for a bowl.

IF we qualify for a bowl game, then by extension we will have won the north?  No scenario that we could get bowl eligible and not also win the division, right?

We could win it at 4-4
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: KITNfury on October 25, 2009, 09:48:24 PM
I thought about that earlier and I don't think it's completely out of the realm of possibilities. All that needs to happen is Texas and Oklahoma beats MU and ku which is what should happen. Then Iowa St. needs to beat an offensively challenged NU team that might have a first time starter at QB. Iowa St. is riding high after smoking Baylor(see fatty's chills thread) and they are no push over this year. The odds are against them but I wouldn't be completely shocked because NU just can't score.

And obviously, KSU needs to beat Colorado which they are favored to do at home.

The standings would look like this:

1. Kansas State 3-1
2. Iowa State 2-2
3. Colorado 1-2
4. Nebraska 1-2
5. Kansas 1-2
6. Missouri 0-3

At that point, with the tiebreaker held over ISU, the North would truly be KSU's to lose.
The EMAW explosion in my pants would not be able to be contained, nor cleaned.
Anybody got a mop?  :beerchug:
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: FelixRex on October 25, 2009, 10:10:13 PM

Anybody got a mop?  :beerchug:

This is gonna take a power towel...
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: EllToPay on October 25, 2009, 10:35:47 PM

Yep, they lost to a Redshirt Freshmen QB in his first collegiate start. They lost to a team where their starting QB and nationally recognized RB were sitting on the bench. They lost to a team they havn't lost to at home since 1977. Yikes, Nebraska is down and I love it!

wut?
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: KITNfury on October 26, 2009, 06:05:56 AM

Anybody got a mop?  :beerchug:

This is gonna take a power towel...
Well played.
Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: FelixRex on October 26, 2009, 07:30:47 AM
here's a what if.

what if nebraska actually scores more than one touchdown this week?

(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
You boys are smoking a little too much crack this week...

^most ridiculous prediction in this thread

Title: Re: Since everyone in the North is playing "what ifs"
Post by: cas on October 26, 2009, 04:52:22 PM
here's a what if.

what if nebraska actually scores more than one touchdown this week?

(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
(http://www.huskerpowerhour.com/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/emot-350.gif)
You boys are smoking a little too much crack this week...

^most ridiculous prediction in this thread


i know my sh1t husker fans.