KSUFans Archives
Sports => Snyder's Electronic Cyber Space World => Topic started by: mjrod on October 01, 2006, 12:00:08 PM
-
Offense
Rushing Offense - 86th (Tied with Virginia Tech) 103.40 ypg
Passing Offense - 66th (1 below Michigan) 195.8 ypg
Total Offense - 88th (ranked 1 ahead of Georgia) 299 ypg
Scoring Offense - 82nd (ranked 1 below Miami) 20.2 ppg
Passing Efficiency - 118th (uggh)
3rd Down Conversion - 93rd (2 below Notre Dame) 32.9%
4th Down Conversion - 47th (tied USC) 57.1%
Defense
Rushing Defense - 25th (1 below KANSAS) 89.6 ypg
Pass Defense - 58th (1 above West Virginia) 190.6 ypg
Total Defense - 28th (9 ahead of Ohio State) 280.2 ypg
Scoring Defense -20th (7 ahead of Nebraska) 14.2 ppg
Tackles for Loss - 9th (tied with Virginia?) 8 tpg
Pass Efficiency Defense - 41st (10 ahead of Oklahoma) 112.07
3rd Down Conversion - 38th (1 ahead of Oklahoma) 32.4%
4th Down Conversion - 47th (6 ahead of Nebraska) 41%
TO Margin - 52nd (tied with UT/ATM) +.20
-
That makes me feel a lot better.
Thanks.
-
Yeah, me too.
Good therapy.
-
Wow, this sprinkled in with my incredibly huge hangover makes for a perfect Sunday.
-
I think I get it...you're trying to say....we suck just as bad as some other teams that are really sucking this year?
-
Whiff.
My post was GP.COMesque...
-
Offense
Rushing Offense - 86th (Tied with Virginia Tech) 103.40 ypg
Passing Offense - 66th (1 below Michigan) 195.8 ypg
Total Offense - 88th (ranked 1 ahead of Georgia) 299 ypg
Scoring Offense - 82nd (ranked 1 below Miami) 20.2 ppg
Passing Efficiency - 118th (uggh)
3rd Down Conversion - 93rd (2 below Notre Dame) 32.9%
4th Down Conversion - 47th (tied USC) 57.1%
Defense
Rushing Defense - 25th (1 below KANSAS) 89.6 ypg
Pass Defense - 58th (1 above West Virginia) 190.6 ypg
Total Defense - 28th (9 ahead of Ohio State) 280.2 ypg
Scoring Defense -20th (7 ahead of Nebraska) 14.2 ppg
Tackles for Loss - 9th (tied with Virginia?) 8 tpg
Pass Efficiency Defense - 41st (10 ahead of Oklahoma) 112.07
3rd Down Conversion - 38th (1 ahead of Oklahoma) 32.4%
4th Down Conversion - 47th (6 ahead of Nebraska) 41%
TO Margin - 52nd (tied with UT/ATM) +.20
So in conclusion our offence is as good as Viginia Tech, Michigan, Notre Dame and USC and will only get better with the stud Freeman. Out defence is better than OU's and NU by a long shot. Big 12 championship here we come.
:jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
-
Our D #'s are very good
-
Your offense kicks serious ass at 4th down conversions.
-
Offense
Rushing Offense - 86th (Tied with Virginia Tech) 103.40 ypg
Passing Offense - 66th (1 below Michigan) 195.8 ypg
Total Offense - 88th (ranked 1 ahead of Georgia) 299 ypg
Scoring Offense - 82nd (ranked 1 below Miami) 20.2 ppg
Passing Efficiency - 118th (uggh)
3rd Down Conversion - 93rd (2 below Notre Dame) 32.9%
4th Down Conversion - 47th (tied USC) 57.1%
Defense
Rushing Defense - 25th (1 below KANSAS) 89.6 ypg
Pass Defense - 58th (1 above West Virginia) 190.6 ypg
Total Defense - 28th (9 ahead of Ohio State) 280.2 ypg
Scoring Defense -20th (7 ahead of Nebraska) 14.2 ppg
Tackles for Loss - 9th (tied with Virginia?) 8 tpg
Pass Efficiency Defense - 41st (10 ahead of Oklahoma) 112.07
3rd Down Conversion - 38th (1 ahead of Oklahoma) 32.4%
4th Down Conversion - 47th (6 ahead of Nebraska) 41%
TO Margin - 52nd (tied with UT/ATM) +.20
So in conclusion our offence is as good as Viginia Tech, Michigan, Notre Dame and USC and will only get better with the stud Freeman. Out defence is better than OU's and NU by a long shot. Big 12 championship here we come.
:jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
don't be a powertard
-
Offense
Rushing Offense - 86th (Tied with Virginia Tech) 103.40 ypg
Passing Offense - 66th (1 below Michigan) 195.8 ypg
Total Offense - 88th (ranked 1 ahead of Georgia) 299 ypg
Scoring Offense - 82nd (ranked 1 below Miami) 20.2 ppg
Passing Efficiency - 118th (uggh)
3rd Down Conversion - 93rd (2 below Notre Dame) 32.9%
4th Down Conversion - 47th (tied USC) 57.1%
Defense
Rushing Defense - 25th (1 below KANSAS) 89.6 ypg
Pass Defense - 58th (1 above West Virginia) 190.6 ypg
Total Defense - 28th (9 ahead of Ohio State) 280.2 ypg
Scoring Defense -20th (7 ahead of Nebraska) 14.2 ppg
Tackles for Loss - 9th (tied with Virginia?) 8 tpg
Pass Efficiency Defense - 41st (10 ahead of Oklahoma) 112.07
3rd Down Conversion - 38th (1 ahead of Oklahoma) 32.4%
4th Down Conversion - 47th (6 ahead of Nebraska) 41%
TO Margin - 52nd (tied with UT/ATM) +.20
So in conclusion our offence is as good as Viginia Tech, Michigan, Notre Dame and USC and will only get better with the stud Freeman. Out defence is better than OU's and NU by a long shot. Big 12 championship here we come.
:jerkoff: :jerkoff: :jerkoff:
don't be a powertard
A powertard would of left this off :jerkoff: and added some of these :hookem: :thumbsup:
-
We still have a winning record.
I would be concerned once we have a losing record.
-
We still have a winning record.
I would be concerned once we have a losing record.
get ready
-
We still have a winning record.
I would be concerned once we have a losing record.
I thought we would have a winning conference record at this point in the season. :frown:
-
We still have a winning record.
I would be concerned once we have a losing record.
I thought we would have a winning conference record at this point in the season. :frown:
0-1 is really bad if that was the only game we played.
I think we can still win 4 games in the conference, but the O-Line is going to have to get better. And we have to capitalize on offense. After reviewing the game, we had about 10 opportunities to put points up. We didn't. That would have changed the game.
-
We still have a winning record.
I would be concerned once we have a losing record.
I thought we would have a winning conference record at this point in the season. :frown:
0-1 is really bad if that was the only game we played.
I think we can still win 4 games in the conference, but the O-Line is going to have to get better. And we have to capitalize on offense. After reviewing the game, we had about 10 opportunities to put points up. We didn't. That would have changed the game.
I like your optimism but I just don't see more than 2 or 3 wins (OSU, CU, ku). Other than those I think we're screwed unless Freeman comes along very, very quickly. It is very hard to win with a true freshman as your QB, especially when you don't have any other weapons to take the heat off him. This is going to be a very long hard season for Cat fans. At least we've been through this before. :rolleyes:
-
We still have a winning record.
I would be concerned once we have a losing record.
I thought we would have a winning conference record at this point in the season. :frown:
0-1 is really bad if that was the only game we played.
I think we can still win 4 games in the conference, but the O-Line is going to have to get better. And we have to capitalize on offense. After reviewing the game, we had about 10 opportunities to put points up. We didn't. That would have changed the game.
I like your optimism but I just don't see more than 2 or 3 wins (OSU, CU, ku). Other than those I think we're screwed unless Freeman comes along very, very quickly. It is very hard to win with a true freshman as your QB, especially when you don't have any other weapons to take the heat off him. This is going to be a very long hard season for Cat fans. At least we've been through this before. :rolleyes:
When I evaluated the season at the beginning, I looked at the schedule as home games vs. away games. We have 8 home games and if we can defend our turn and win 6 of those, then we don't have as much pressure to win on the road.
Realistically, Louisville and Texas are considered losses (1-0 in that prediction) and the remaining home games are OSU, NU, Iowa State. That leaves Baylor, Mizzou, ku and Colorado, and I thought Baylor would be the win, but we'd need just ONE win on the road to get 7 wins and a bowl game. Colorado could now be that win. I thought maybe ku and Mizzou could be wins, but those teams seem to have found their groove and so more than likely, we end up 0 fer in the eastern border wars. The only good side is that KSU/ku will be an emotional game, and Mizzou still has Pinkel.
We should be able to take OSU and Nebraska. I don't care what Nubb fans say, Nebraska is not as good as they are touted. Callahan's strategy is to score early and quick, and against teams in the Big 12, scoring early and quick will not win you games if you have a suspect defense like Nubb does. They are hurting in the secondary and their linebackers aren't really that good. Carriker is the only standout on that side and even then, he's been ineffective in really getting great plays.
Baylor told us a lot about our team. We have no offense. We put just two TD's on the board, we win that game because the D will have no pressure on them. A team that doesn't have to play for pressure does a better job.
So while I'm optimistic, the reality is, KSU looks like a 5-7 team right now, maybe, but if we can just get the offense to score points, and take advantage of at least 1/2 the opportunities (TO', ST play, etc.) then we could be 7-5 or even 8-4. All we need is an offense, and right now, that's a tall order. OSU will give our offense all it can handle. We have to get out there and set the tone. Raheem will do the rest.