KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 08:49:53 AM

Title: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 08:49:53 AM
Frankites . . . more zealous than Woolites??
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 08:52:36 AM
Way too early to call right now. 

IMHO Frank will be easier to turn on though if/when the time comes.

 :kstatriot:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 08:55:42 AM
LOL at Dax melting down after this game  :lol:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 08:57:04 AM
Irrational Woolites didn't exist until year 4 of the wooly era IMO.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 08:57:54 AM
LOL at Dax melting down after this game  :lol:

Did Dax have his tipping point already?  Will he be bringing anti-Frank posts with his anti-ku persistence and intensity?  Stay tuned...



 :peek:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 08:58:29 AM
Irrational Woolites didn't exist until year 4 of the wooly era IMO.

QFT*!

*And I should know.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 09:01:21 AM
Irrational Woolites didn't exist until year 4 of the wooly era IMO.

QFT*!

*And I should know.

I was an irrational woolite for a year.  I loathed him his last season.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: CrushNasty on January 14, 2009, 09:06:48 AM
Irrational Woolites didn't exist until year 4 of the wooly era IMO.

QFT*!

*And I should know.

I was an irrational woolite for a year.  I loathed him his last season.

+1

Martin will get his talent in here, and it'll be worth being a Martinite. F U Kent (wooly), and F U Colon (huggs  :peek:).... If Judge disappoints I'll be all  :suicideispainless:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu98 on January 14, 2009, 09:11:37 AM
Everything is going to be fine we lost to the best team in the big 12 at home and we lost to the third best team at their place.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:13:40 AM
Yeah, I am "melting down" . . . LOL at the hyperdefensive Martinites who can't even handle the least bit of questioning of what Frank is doing (or not doing out there).  



Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 09:18:31 AM
Yeah, I am "melting down" . . . LOL at the hyperdefensive Martinites who can't even handle the least bit of questioning of what Frank is doing (or not doing out there).  





Because it's all about the players.  If you want to get pissed at Martin, get pissed on him for missing out on Wesley Witherspoon and Kenny Kadji and Ray Shipman, not for whatever he failed to do last night.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:20:09 AM
Yeah, I am "melting down" . . . LOL at the hyperdefensive Martinites who can't even handle the least bit of questioning of what Frank is doing (or not doing out there).  





Because it's all about the players.  If you want to get pissed at Martin, get pissed on him for missing out on Wesley Witherspoon and Kenny Kadji and Ray Shipman, not for whatever he failed to do last night.

Who is pissed??

But I love the logic . . . hey, we just don't have the talent, so don't even bother to ask any questions about his inability to have a team prepared to play, his weird ass substitution patterns and his lack of an actual offense. 
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 09:21:19 AM
Yeah, I am "melting down" . . . LOL at the hyperdefensive Martinites who can't even handle the least bit of questioning of what Frank is doing (or not doing out there).  

Where did I defend Frank (assuming you are refering to me)?
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on January 14, 2009, 09:22:41 AM
sodj never gets upset.  always calm, cool, collected and reasonable.  what we would do w/o him?  we'd all be losing our heads and not keeping things in perspective.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:24:01 AM
sodj never gets upset.  always calm, cool, collected and reasonable.  what we would do w/o him?  we'd all be losing our heads and not keeping things in perspective.

:powertard: :powertard: :powertard: :powertard:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:24:37 AM
Yeah, I am "melting down" . . . LOL at the hyperdefensive Martinites who can't even handle the least bit of questioning of what Frank is doing (or not doing out there).  

Where did I defend Frank (assuming you are refering to me)?

 :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 09:25:17 AM
But I love the logic . . . hey, we just don't have the talent, so don't even bother to ask any questions about his inability to have a team prepared to play, his weird ass substitution patterns and his lack of an actual offense. 

Glad you like it.  Hopefully you will see the light some day.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on January 14, 2009, 09:25:42 AM
sodj never gets upset.  always calm, cool, collected and reasonable.  what we would do w/o him?  we'd all be losing our heads and not keeping things in perspective.

:powertard: :powertard: :powertard: :powertard:

why so angry?
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:26:20 AM
But I love the logic . . . hey, we just don't have the talent, so don't even bother to ask any questions about his inability to have a team prepared to play, his weird ass substitution patterns and his lack of an actual offense. 

Glad you like it.  Hopefully you will see the light some day.

Oh yeah, I clearly don't understand the need for talent . . . in Frank's case, top talent or just pretty much forget about it. 
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 09:27:00 AM
Yeah, I am "melting down" . . . LOL at the hyperdefensive Martinites who can't even handle the least bit of questioning of what Frank is doing (or not doing out there).  

Where did I defend Frank (assuming you are refering to me)?

 :rolleyes:

What does that even mean (other than you couldn't find an instance of me being a "hyperdefensive Martinite")?
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:27:16 AM
sodj never gets upset.  always calm, cool, collected and reasonable.  what we would do w/o him?  we'd all be losing our heads and not keeping things in perspective.

:powertard: :powertard: :powertard: :powertard:

why so angry?

Not angry . . . but  :powertard: is   :powertard: . . . you just can't cut it any other way.

Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 09:27:50 AM
But I love the logic . . . hey, we just don't have the talent, so don't even bother to ask any questions about his inability to have a team prepared to play, his weird ass substitution patterns and his lack of an actual offense. 

Glad you like it.  Hopefully you will see the light some day.

. . . in Frank's case, top talent or just pretty much forget about it. 

It's like that w/ everyone, except maybe John Beilein.

Luckily, top talent appears to be coming.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:28:02 AM
Yeah, I am "melting down" . . . LOL at the hyperdefensive Martinites who can't even handle the least bit of questioning of what Frank is doing (or not doing out there).  

Where did I defend Frank (assuming you are refering to me)?

 :rolleyes:

What does that even mean (other than you couldn't find an instance of me being a "hyperdefensive Martinite")?

LOL . . . I am just messing with you.   Relax.   :cheers:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on January 14, 2009, 09:29:25 AM
sodj never gets upset.  always calm, cool, collected and reasonable.  what we would do w/o him?  we'd all be losing our heads and not keeping things in perspective.

:powertard: :powertard: :powertard: :powertard:

why so angry?

Not angry . . . but  :powertard: is   :powertard: . . . you just can't cut it any other way.


:powertard:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 09:29:46 AM
dax has always had the best meltdowns.  
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:30:16 AM
But I love the logic . . . hey, we just don't have the talent, so don't even bother to ask any questions about his inability to have a team prepared to play, his weird ass substitution patterns and his lack of an actual offense. 

Glad you like it.  Hopefully you will see the light some day.

. . . in Frank's case, top talent or just pretty much forget about it. 

It's like that w/ everyone, except maybe John Beilein.

Luckily, top talent appears to be coming.

Sure, it appears to be coming.

Why even have the coaches on the sidelines during games?? Or even have them show up at practice . . . if you get what "appears" to be top talent, that's all you need.  Screw an actual offense or getting the team ready to play.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on January 14, 2009, 09:30:57 AM
(http://www.ksufans.com/forums/Smileys/ksufans/ptard2-1.png)
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:31:10 AM
dax has always had the best meltdowns.  

Extreme . . .  :powertard:

Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on January 14, 2009, 09:31:56 AM
(http://www.ksufans.com/forums/Smileys/ksufans/ptard2-1.png)
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:32:47 AM
mcm . . . since you don't have anything real to add, at least make sure you vote in the poll.

Thanks . . . and you're a fine . . .   :powertard:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 09:33:30 AM
Dax, I don't think you understan what  :powertard: means.  For example, the GPC board is 100% jam packed with people saying the exact thing you are saying in this thread.  That would seem to indicate your usage of  :powertard: is incorrect and, in fact, the polar opposite of what it actually means.  
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on January 14, 2009, 09:33:40 AM
mcm . . . since you don't have anything real to add, at least make sure you vote in the poll.

Thanks . . . and you're a fine . . .   :powertard:
 sodj never :angryMJ:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 09:34:06 AM
dax has always had the best meltdowns.  

Extreme . . .  :powertard:



I especially love it when you get into "damn right I'm going to get in the last post in this thread" mode.  
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 09:34:23 AM
Sure, it appears to be coming.

Why even have the coaches on the sidelines during games?? Or even have them show up at practice . . . if you get what "appears" to be top talent, that's all you need.  Screw an actual offense or getting the team ready to play.

all coaches at the D1 level are about equal at "running offense" and getting teams "ready to play" (w/ very few exceptions).  Some are just better recruiters than others.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: cireksu on January 14, 2009, 09:35:24 AM
Frank martin needs to coach our guards to stop turning the ball over better.  That's my only complaint.  I wonder if they work on that?
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:36:48 AM
Dax, I don't think you understan what  :powertard: means.  For example, the GPC board is 100% jam packed with people saying the exact thing you are saying in this thread.  That would seem to indicate your usage of  :powertard: is incorrect and, in fact, the polar opposite of what it actually means.  

Sure I understand . . . and it's extreme powertard almost extreme Woolite the way some on here will not and cannot tolerate any questioning of what Frank is trying or not trying to do.

But hey, lets just all quit talking about Frank and understand if he's only gotten Sessions things would be totally different.  

An actual offense is for losers.




Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 09:37:27 AM
Frank martin needs to coach our guards to stop turning the ball over better.  That's my only complaint.  I wonder if they work on that?

Should coach'em up to f^cking nail it from 3 imo
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 09:38:11 AM
Dax, I don't think you understan what  :powertard: means.  For example, the GPC board is 100% jam packed with people saying the exact thing you are saying in this thread.  That would seem to indicate your usage of  :powertard: is incorrect and, in fact, the polar opposite of what it actually means.  

Sure I understand . . . and it's extreme powertard almost extreme Woolite the way some on here will not and cannot tolerate any questioning of what Frank is trying or not trying to do.

But hey, lets just all quit talking about Frank and understand if he's only gotten Sessions things would be totally different.  

An actual offense is for losers.

OK
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: doom on January 14, 2009, 09:39:30 AM
I think Frank is not going to end up like Woolite did with no result to defend himself with.  That being said, he could lose every game from here on out and he's still my f-ing hero.  
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 09:39:42 AM
who is sessions?

:dunno:

Love the "real offense" talking point, though.  :billypopcorn:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 09:41:14 AM
who is sessions?

:dunno:

Does it matter?
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on January 14, 2009, 09:41:22 AM
who is sessions?

:dunno:

Love the "real offense" talking point, though.  :billypopcorn:

frank needs to run the wildcat offense imo
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:41:40 AM
Well Rusty, please explain what K-State does on the offensive end of the court . . . can anyone actually describe that without pulling out some Dana Altman at K-State game film??

Oh, and I meant Witherspoon (sp??) or KK, don't know where I got Sessions.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: greasd up deaf guy on January 14, 2009, 09:42:07 AM
 :popcorn:

These are the kind of threads people get disassociated over.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:45:30 AM
:popcorn:

These are the kind of threads people get disassociated over.

I don't think the BK regime is as concerned about the Interwebs as TW was.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 09:47:55 AM
Well Rusty, please explain what K-State does on the offensive end of the court . . . can anyone actually describe that without pulling out some Dana Altman at K-State game film??

When they don't turn the ball over, they usually get decent looks.  The bigs got the ball in great position A LOT last night, and scored over a point per possession, which is pretty decent, especially against Kansas.  Just had too many turnovers which led to too many ku transition points.

What did you see that you didn't like from your suite at the RBC Center?
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 09:49:35 AM
In hearing my friend describe the game before I got a chance to watch it, I would've thought K-State had 30 turnovers, they had 13.

Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: greasd up deaf guy on January 14, 2009, 09:51:10 AM
Huggs' substitution patterns were as weird as Martin's. His offense was also LOL'able.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 09:56:52 AM
Well Rusty, please explain what K-State does on the offensive end of the court . . . can anyone actually describe that without pulling out some Dana Altman at K-State game film??

Oh, and I meant Witherspoon (sp??) or KK, don't know where I got Sessions.

We are trying to run a ball screen offense for Clemente/Pullen and when that doesn't work we go to a sort of motion.  I'm not going to disagree with the fact that Frank is not a genius when it comes to halfcourt offense, but then again I don't expect him to be.  I'm much more ticked that he hasn't found ways to get this team into more transition opportunities, but then again when you don't play defense and the other team makes nearly 60% of their shots, that's hard to do. 

Clearly, Frank is a primary contributor to an aweful 30 minute stretch (or) so of basketball that we saw across the last two ball games, but I don't think the players have been real great at executing the gameplan either.  I thought Frank made some nice adjustments last night, unfortunately it was after the thing was nearly already over.  And the inability to adjust to OU's half court trap was pretty poor for all parties involved.  But to me this isn't the time to get real upset; if we go to Lincoln and have some of the same issues against a team that is much more equal to us in talent, then I'll probably have something more to say.  Right now, not really.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 10:00:45 AM
Well Rusty, please explain what K-State does on the offensive end of the court . . . can anyone actually describe that without pulling out some Dana Altman at K-State game film??

Oh, and I meant Witherspoon (sp??) or KK, don't know where I got Sessions.

We are trying to run a ball screen offense for Clemente/Pullen and when that doesn't work we go to a sort of motion.  I'm not going to disagree with the fact that Frank is not a genius when it comes to halfcourt offense, but then again I don't expect him to be.  I'm much more ticked that he hasn't found ways to get this team into more transition opportunities, but then again when you don't play defense and the other team makes nearly 60% of their shots, that's hard to do. 

Clearly, Frank is a primary contributor to an aweful 30 minute stretch (or) so of basketball that we saw across the last two ball games, but I don't think the players have been real great at executing the gameplan either.  I thought Frank made some nice adjustments last night, unfortunately it was after the thing was nearly already over.  And the inability to adjust to OU's half court trap was pretty poor for all parties involved.  But to me this isn't the time to get real upset; if we go to Lincoln and have some of the same issues against a team that is much more equal to us in talent, then I'll probably have something more to say.  Right now, not really.

Ok . . . and I agree, Frank keeps talking about pushing the ball.  Well it's primarily Clemente totally out of control pushing the ball . . . hell any team can find some really fast guy on the dribble to run up and down the court.  How about an actual transition game . . . you know, spacing, secondary break all that kind of stuff, not just running down the floor like your hair is on fire.

Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: greasd up deaf guy on January 14, 2009, 10:01:09 AM
My WTF with Martin last night was when he said it was his fault that they weren't prepared to defend ball screens. Something to the effect of "they don't do that very often". Am I missing something or isn't that a gigantic part of what they do every game?
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 10:02:56 AM
Well Rusty, please explain what K-State does on the offensive end of the court . . . can anyone actually describe that without pulling out some Dana Altman at K-State game film??

Oh, and I meant Witherspoon (sp??) or KK, don't know where I got Sessions.

We are trying to run a ball screen offense for Clemente/Pullen and when that doesn't work we go to a sort of motion.  I'm not going to disagree with the fact that Frank is not a genius when it comes to halfcourt offense, but then again I don't expect him to be.  I'm much more ticked that he hasn't found ways to get this team into more transition opportunities, but then again when you don't play defense and the other team makes nearly 60% of their shots, that's hard to do. 

Clearly, Frank is a primary contributor to an aweful 30 minute stretch (or) so of basketball that we saw across the last two ball games, but I don't think the players have been real great at executing the gameplan either.  I thought Frank made some nice adjustments last night, unfortunately it was after the thing was nearly already over.  And the inability to adjust to OU's half court trap was pretty poor for all parties involved.  But to me this isn't the time to get real upset; if we go to Lincoln and have some of the same issues against a team that is much more equal to us in talent, then I'll probably have something more to say.  Right now, not really.

Ok . . . and I agree, Frank keeps talking about pushing the ball.  Well it's primarily Clemente totally out of control pushing the ball . . . hell any team can find some really fast guy on the dribble to run up and down the court.  How about an actual transition game . . . you know, spacing, secondary break all that kind of stuff, not just running down the floor like your hair is on fire.



That's fair.  Clemente's decision making on when to attack and when to get into some secondary stuff is questionable at best. 
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 10:04:26 AM
they run a secondary break, and got a few looks out of it.  I'd actually prefer more clemente hair on fire drives to the secondary break.  :dunno:

The lack of transition offense is prob. my biggest beef.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: Skycat on January 14, 2009, 10:12:58 AM
I wish Clemente could learn to draw contact when he does attack.  He's got guys on their heels, but then he lets them off the hook by fading away from the defender instead of getting into their chest.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ltrain37 on January 14, 2009, 10:15:05 AM
In hearing my friend describe the game before I got a chance to watch it, I would've thought K-State had 30 turnovers, they had 13.



The quantity of turnovers probably wasn't all that bad...but it seemed like half of them happened in the first 5 minutes way out on the point...led to too many transition baskets early on.  I could accept turnovers if we were cutting and screening and trying to get the ball inside...but we couldn't even make a pass out on the wing to start the game.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 10:16:21 AM
Well ok . . . I think we've got this all settled.  

 :cheers: :woot: :woot: :beerchug:

Oh and ltrain . . . guys on the team are talking about not being prepared to play . . . seriously that's a major WTF.

Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 10:20:24 AM
In hearing my friend describe the game before I got a chance to watch it, I would've thought K-State had 30 turnovers, they had 13.



The quantity of turnovers probably wasn't all that bad...but it seemed like half of them happened in the first 5 minutes way out on the point...led to too many transition baskets early on.  I could accept turnovers if we were cutting and screening and trying to get the ball inside...but we couldn't even make a pass out on the wing to start the game.

9 TO in the first 11 minutes*.

I don't want to make about being prepared b/c this was pretty much the opposite of the OU game where we were very prepared and then couldn't adjust.  In Lawrence we looked like it was our first time on the floor, then made some nice adjustments.  So there's not really a trend here, I need to see more to make a judgement on that.  Its just magnified b/c we played ku.

*What the heck is wrong with our SI department?  No play by play stats for our home games is unacceptable.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: catdude33 on January 14, 2009, 10:29:06 AM
I am going to be an unbelievablely staunch Martinite.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: Chingon on January 14, 2009, 10:32:40 AM
I am still  :confused: about playing Colon with 4 fouls.  High school type coaching move.  Can't add I guess.

LOL
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: cireksu on January 14, 2009, 10:40:15 AM
I am still  :confused: about playing Colon with 4 fouls.  High school type coaching move.  Can't add I guess.

LOL

did you want kent out there?   Did you want to sit him hoping we could make a comeback and bring him back in when we are down 1 and did you want LU taking the last shot?
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: cireksu on January 14, 2009, 10:42:27 AM
I am still  :confused: about playing Colon with 4 fouls.  High school type coaching move.  Can't add I guess.

LOL

did you want kent out there?   Did you want to sit him hoping we could make a comeback and bring him back in when we are down 1 and did you want LU taking the last shot?

I'm a tard.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 10:43:24 AM
The "how to use Colon with 4 fouls" talking point is by far one of the best we've had around here for quite some time.  Quality stuff.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: cireksu on January 14, 2009, 10:48:30 AM
LU has made himself into a big 12 calliber contributer, but he should never be counted on for more than maybe 15 -20 minutes/game.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 10:50:26 AM
The "how to use Colon with 4 fouls" talking point is by far one of the best we've had around here for quite some time.  Quality stuff.

LOL
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: greasd up deaf guy on January 14, 2009, 10:52:00 AM
I recall thinking before the game last night, "If Lou (Sex Panther) Colon gets in foul trouble, we could be screwed."
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: Chingon on January 14, 2009, 11:02:43 AM
Until Frank learns how to develop a substitution pattern and a half court offense that revolves around Luis, he will never shed the "high school" label.

We def need to run some sort of Princeton offense, remember how fun it was to watch those small school run that, and almost pull off upsets in the first round of the tournament?   Maybe one day we'll get a coach that will run an offense good enough to almost pull off a first round upset.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 11:24:22 AM
Until Frank learns how to develop a substitution pattern and a half court offense that revolves around Luis, he will never shed the "high school" label.

We def need to run some sort of Princeton offense, remember how fun it was to watch those small school run that, and almost pull off upsets in the first round of the tournament?   Maybe one day we'll get a coach that will run an offense good enough to almost pull off a first round upset.

Plus, Princeton offense coaches always coach up players to f^cking nail it from 3. 
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 11:31:22 AM
Until Frank learns how to develop a substitution pattern and a half court offense that revolves around Luis, he will never shed the "high school" label.

We def need to run some sort of Princeton offense, remember how fun it was to watch those small school run that, and almost pull off upsets in the first round of the tournament?   Maybe one day we'll get a coach that will run an offense good enough to almost pull off a first round upset.

Plus, Princeton offense coaches always coach up players to f^cking nail it from 3. 

Yes, and their dudes always do a great job getting into triple threat position, something in which our current group is severely lacking.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: cireksu on January 14, 2009, 11:48:46 AM
Yeah, because they go to fracking princeton.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 12:08:30 PM
Until Frank learns how to develop a substitution pattern and a half court offense that revolves around Luis, he will never shed the "high school" label.

We def need to run some sort of Princeton offense, remember how fun it was to watch those small school run that, and almost pull off upsets in the first round of the tournament?   Maybe one day we'll get a coach that will run an offense good enough to almost pull off a first round upset.

Plus, Princeton offense coaches always coach up players to f^cking nail it from 3. 

Yes, and their dudes always do a great job getting into triple threat position, something in which our current group is severely lacking.

JUMP STOP, DAMMIT!
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: cireksu on January 14, 2009, 12:10:24 PM
Until Frank learns how to develop a substitution pattern and a half court offense that revolves around Luis, he will never shed the "high school" label.

We def need to run some sort of Princeton offense, remember how fun it was to watch those small school run that, and almost pull off upsets in the first round of the tournament?   Maybe one day we'll get a coach that will run an offense good enough to almost pull off a first round upset.

Plus, Princeton offense coaches always coach up players to f^cking nail it from 3. 

Yes, and their dudes always do a great job getting into triple threat position, something in which our current group is severely lacking.

JUMP STOP, DAMMIT!

Yeah, would love to see dom and jamsam develop this part of their game better in the paint.  Dom's fallway airball/brick was awful.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 14, 2009, 01:07:01 PM
You guys aren't taking this seriously.   :curse:

But you do have to admire the Brown-Sutton combo going 2 for 11 from 3 last night.

Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sys on January 14, 2009, 01:18:00 PM
It's like that w/ everyone, except maybe John Beilein.

huge props to me.  between your coworker with tickets and your new, little beilein crush, definitely a michigan man.

Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 01:20:57 PM
You guys aren't taking this seriously.   :curse:

But you do have to admire the Brown-Sutton combo going 2 for 11 from 3 last night.



Well, there is another correlation for success.

3 PT from Clemlenown.
ku 2-11 (Clemente no attempts)
OU 7-23
OR 4-19
IA 2-5 (Clemente/Brown no attempts  :confused:)
uk 6-18
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: Saulbadguy on January 14, 2009, 01:22:18 PM
Brown should shoot 3's on every possession imo.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: sys on January 14, 2009, 01:26:16 PM
Brown should shoot 3's on every possession imo.

i hate it when he drives.  he should have been coached into the understanding that he's a one dimensional player.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: PCR on January 14, 2009, 01:32:58 PM
Franks gotta learn how to coach guys who aren't all that talented.  I dunno if anyone noticed, but there's been a bit of a dropoff from last year's team talent-wise.  He needs to realize that blaming his players for sucking isn't going to solve the problems we have.  Teaching them fundamentals like blocking out and ball handling will go a lot farther.

I'm not jumping off the FM bandwagon yet, this team is really sloppy and not good enough to overcome it.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: steve dave on January 14, 2009, 01:52:57 PM
Teaching them fundamentals like blocking out and ball handling will go a lot farther.

Yeah, let's just run Wooden Drills and Three Man Weave all f^cking practice.  :flush:
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 01:59:45 PM
It's like that w/ everyone, except maybe John Beilein.

huge props to me.  between your coworker with tickets and your new, little beilein crush, definitely a michigan man.



I've had a beilein crush for a moderately long amount of time.  'clams can confirm, imo.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: michigancat on January 14, 2009, 02:02:19 PM
Franks gotta learn how to coach guys who aren't all that talented.  I dunno if anyone noticed, but there's been a bit of a dropoff from last year's team talent-wise.  He needs to realize that blaming his players for sucking isn't going to solve the problems we have.  Teaching them fundamentals like blocking out and ball handling will go a lot farther.

this is where you're wrong.  He just needs to recruit better.  And LOL @ criticizing a Martin coached team for anything rebounding related.
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: ksu_FAN on January 14, 2009, 02:26:51 PM
Teaching them fundamentals like blocking out and ball handling will go a lot farther.

Yeah, let's just run Wooden Drills and Three Man Weave all f^cking practice.  :flush:

Quote from: Coach
Five players on the floor functioning as one single unit: team, team, team - no one more important that the other.

(http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/2305/frankhoosierscopyrw2.jpg)
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: GoldbrickGangBoss on January 14, 2009, 02:54:21 PM
Franks gotta learn how to coach guys who aren't all that talented.  I dunno if anyone noticed, but there's been a bit of a dropoff from last year's team talent-wise.  He needs to realize that blaming his players for sucking isn't going to solve the problems we have.  Teaching them fundamentals like blocking out and ball handling will go a lot farther.



I laughed when Colon flushed fouled out.

Frank was out there all angry the whole game. He's just bein' Frank*.

*a poor coach
Title: Re: Martinites vs Woolites . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on January 14, 2009, 02:55:29 PM
Franks gotta learn how to coach guys who aren't all that talented.  I dunno if anyone noticed, but there's been a bit of a dropoff from last year's team talent-wise.  He needs to realize that blaming his players for sucking isn't going to solve the problems we have.  Teaching them fundamentals like blocking out and ball handling will go a lot farther.



I laughed when Colon flushed fouled out.

Frank was out there all angry the whole game. He's just bein' Frank*.

*a poor coach

colon's pwnage of aldrich => frank's genius.