KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 12, 2006, 10:22:31 PM

Title: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 12, 2006, 10:22:31 PM
nm.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: Saulbadguy on September 12, 2006, 10:25:01 PM
lol
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 12, 2006, 10:27:18 PM
(http://www.kusports.com/art/apps/pennynews/1110525456_sportskstate.jpg)
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: jeffy on September 12, 2006, 10:31:06 PM
nm.


pwned!
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 12, 2006, 10:31:17 PM
lol

ROFL.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 12, 2006, 10:32:23 PM
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/84/Taxi_Driver_still_5.jpg)
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 12, 2006, 10:54:13 PM
Are you fantasizing about me, Dax?
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: WilliamTheWildcat on September 12, 2006, 11:06:01 PM
Hairpiece?
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: chum1 on September 12, 2006, 11:16:23 PM
nm.

(http://www.unc.edu/~jonpark/Roy%20Williams.jpg)

nm.

Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 12, 2006, 11:18:24 PM
Why would that picture bother me?
Title: ROY!
Post by: pissclams on September 12, 2006, 11:30:37 PM
nm.

(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/6591/imstayingvk0.jpg)
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2006, 07:51:13 AM
pc, they're better off with Self.  Roy was a godawful coach.

That's why it doesn't bother him.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 13, 2006, 08:06:36 AM
Are you fantasizing about me, Dax?

Sorry the Squawk Daisy chain is here .... http://kansas.scout.com/
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: pissclams on September 13, 2006, 08:39:13 AM
pc, they're better off with Self.  Roy was a godawful coach.

That's why it doesn't bother him.
roy wasn't a bad coach, he just smokes too much weed, check his eyes in that pic for evidence.  what other reason would he have for his eyes looking like that??
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 13, 2006, 09:03:23 AM
I think Roy's tirades are better then Coach Hair Club for Men.

Roy really could toss that jacket.

Plus ... Roy never lost in the 1st round.

Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: pissclams on September 13, 2006, 09:17:33 AM
But Roy's ties... they (it, the rainbow one, you remember it) were so bad...

 :yuck:
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: JavaCat on September 13, 2006, 09:41:28 AM
Pittsburg in the house!!!
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 13, 2006, 10:41:35 AM
You guys are a ton of fun.  Minus Rusty.  He's always a wet blanket.

I see a lot of good things for this board.

EDIT:

Quote
Roy was a godawful coach.

Just out of curiosity though, who said he was a God-awful coach?
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 13, 2006, 10:46:56 AM
You guys are a ton of fun.  Minus Rusty.  He's always a wet blanket.

I see a lot of good things for this board.

EDIT:

Quote
Roy was a godawful coach.

Just out of curiosity though, who said he was a God-awful coach?

No Link ... No Proof ... Squawklogic

If it's not in the Internet ... It didn't happen ... Squawklogic


I digress ... we see good things for you Pit, how was the Betty Ford Clinic??

Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2006, 10:56:36 AM
You guys are a ton of fun.  Minus Rusty.  He's always a wet blanket.

I see a lot of good things for this board.

EDIT:

Quote
Roy was a godawful coach.

Just out of curiosity though, who said he was a God-awful coach?

I was "exaggerating" somewhat.  However, saying Roy is a bad coach isn't much more ridiculous than saying you're better off with Self.

What does it matter?  You guys are over him.  I saw a thread about it today*.


*3 years, 4 months, and 29 days after he left.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 13, 2006, 11:00:55 AM
Betty Ford Clinic?  Good grief, Dax.  Where did that even come from?  What reason would I have, one that you could possibly be referencing, for heavy drinking or heavy drug use?

Quote
I was "exaggerating" somewhat.  However, saying Roy is a bad coach isn't much more ridiculous than saying you're better off with Self.

Obviously, at this point we're not better off with Self.  Two first round faceplants aren't pretty.

However, I do personally prefer Self.  Self wants to be here.  Roy didn't.  Why would I want someone to coach my team who thinks we're second rate, as Roy so obviously did/does?

As an aside, and in all seriousness, this board is going to be a blast.  GPC and kstatefans suck hardcore these days; so badly, in fact, that I rarely even bother to read them anymore. 

This board is like a collection of the KSU all-stars.  Dax, Rusty, and Fatty...all on one board!  All we need is Hatter thrown into the mix.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: Saulbadguy on September 13, 2006, 11:02:48 AM
Hatter wouldn't last a second here.  Noone buys crap - except fatty.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 13, 2006, 11:03:44 AM
Sorry Pit ... wrong rumor.

Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: chum1 on September 13, 2006, 11:05:21 AM
Quote
I'd say that I'm pretty much over it.

(http://www.cjonline.com/images/041603/3856_512.jpg)

Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 13, 2006, 11:06:10 AM
Hatter wouldn't last a second here.  Noone buys @#%$ - except fatty.

"scoring options for ku are being eliminated as we speak." - the manhatter


 :lol:  :love:
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2006, 11:06:22 AM
However, I do personally prefer Self.  Self wants to be here.  Roy didn't.  Why would I want someone to coach my team who thinks we're second rate, as Roy so obviously did/does?

Cause it makes you better a better team.  For example, I'd rather have Rick Pitino be my coach and think Manhattan is a sh1thole than have Jim "I love KSU" Wooldridge lead us.

Hatter reads this board, but won't post.  I would love to have him here if we had more rivals on board.  He knows how to push buttons!
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: Saulbadguy on September 13, 2006, 11:08:02 AM
Hatter wouldn't last a second here.  Noone buys @#%$ - except fatty.

"scoring options for ku are being eliminated as we speak." - the manhatter


 :lol:  :love:
;)
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: WilliamTheWildcat on September 13, 2006, 11:15:00 AM
I can't believe anybody would actually wear that shirt.  I have also seen the shirt with Roy's pic that said "The Lyin' King."

&@#%ing losers.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 13, 2006, 11:15:50 AM
Quote
Cause it makes you better a better team.

Different strokes, I guess.

If the difference were just a gaping chasm, I would probably be more in line with your way of thinking.  Self's still got a bit of time (this season) to make a run into the tourney before I start thinking too negatively about him.  He's currently recruiting at a level that even Roy never did while here, however, and I think there's something to be said for talent winning out in the end.  I guess we'll see.

For now, however, I'll stick with the guy who wants to be at ku, rather than the guy who thinks ku is "stuck out there."

How'd we get to talking Hoops on the Gridiron "Plaza," people?
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 13, 2006, 11:20:07 AM
Being a more astute board we're able to mix in a variety of sports.

FYI for those in our Cricket Fantasy League:

Batsmen R B 4s 6s SR   
 V Sibanda (rhb) 0 7 0 0 0.00  striker
 T Duffin (lhb) 10 8 2 0 125.00  non-striker


 Bowlers O M R W Econ   
 JJ van der Wath (rf) 1.2 0 3 0 2.25  (1nb, 1w) 
 WA Deacon (lfm) 1.0 0 10 0 10.00  (0nb, 0w)

Eagles v Zimbabweans  2006/07 season 


Played at De Beers Diamond Oval, Kimberley, on 13 September 2006 - day/night (20-over match)
 


       
 Zimbabweans innings (20 overs maximum) R B 4s 6s SR 
 T Duffin not out 10 8 2 0 125.00 
 V Sibanda not out 0 5 0 0 0.00 
     Extras (b 1, lb 2, w 1, nb 2) 6     
         
     Total (0 wickets; 2 overs) 16     


To bat CJ Chibhabha, BRM Taylor, H Masakadza, AJ Ireland, EC Rainsford, T Kamungozi, T Maruma, E Chigumbura, S Matsikenyeri 


       
  Bowling O M R W Econ 
  JJ van der Wath 1 0 3 0 3.00 (1nb, 1w)
  WA Deacon 1 0 10 0 10.00 


   
 Eagles team     
LL Bosman, DJ Jacobs, JA Rudolph, MN van Wyk, HH Dippenaar, N Boje, JJ van der Wath, R Telemachus, WA Deacon, T Tshabalala, PV Mpitsang 


 


Toss Zimbabweans, who chose to bat first


Twenty20 debuts CJ Chibhabha, E Chigumbura, T Duffin, AJ Ireland, T Kamungozi, T Maruma, H Masakadza, S Matsikenyeri, EC Rainsford, V Sibanda and BRM Taylor (Zimbabweans)


Umpires IL Howell and BG Jerling
TV umpire MZ Nanabhay
Match referee A Barnes
Reserve umpire C Conradie

 



Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: WilliamTheWildcat on September 13, 2006, 11:21:09 AM
Quote
If the difference were just a gaping chasm...,

Nice descrpition of phognet.  

Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: WilliamTheWildcat on September 13, 2006, 11:22:11 AM
Sorry Saul.  Sometimes I forget where I'm at.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2006, 11:29:57 AM
Quote
Cause it makes you better a better team.

If the difference were just a gaping chasm, I would probably be more in line with your way of thinking.  Self's still got a bit of time (this season) to make a run into the tourney before I start thinking too negatively about him.  He's currently recruiting at a level that even Roy never did while here, however, and I think there's something to be said for talent winning out in the end.  I guess we'll see.


I think the fact that Roy left like he did is why ku fans are praying Huggins leaves KSU in three years.  He broke your poor lil' hearts.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 13, 2006, 11:32:33 AM
In all honestly, Self is kicking RW ass on the recruiting trail (while both were at ku)

But 3-3 in the NCAA's really sucks considering Roy left BS w/the three studs
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 13, 2006, 11:34:30 AM

Quote
I think the fact that Roy left like he did is why ku fans are praying Huggins leaves KSU in three years.  He broke your poor lil' hearts.

I don't think there's any link between the two situations at all.  And I certainly don't think there are any ku fans who are so scared by Huggins that they are literally praying for him to leave Manhattan.  Huggins is a good coach.  He's not a great one, or at least he hasn't been in the past, and there really isn't a body of evidence to suggest that he's a far superior coach to Bill Self.

Also, I think KSU fans have always overstated the sadness, the natural reaction to a "broken heart," ku fans felt at Roy's departure.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: fatty fat fat on September 13, 2006, 11:35:47 AM
He won at Cinncinatti. Winning at KSU will be a piece of cake.

Huggs has never recruited as well as he is now.

That is a scary thought.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 13, 2006, 11:37:28 AM
That's certainly an interesting take, fatty.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2006, 11:39:57 AM

Quote
I think the fact that Roy left like he did is why ku fans are praying Huggins leaves KSU in three years.  He broke your poor lil' hearts.

I don't think there's any link between the two situations at all.  And I certainly don't think there are any ku fans who are so scared by Huggins that they are literally praying for him to leave Manhattan.

No.  Pretty sure 95% of ku fans literally get down on their knees and pray that Bob Huggins leaves Manhattan ASAP.


Huggins is a good coach.  He's not a great one, or at least he hasn't been in the past, and there really isn't a body of evidence to suggest that he's a far superior coach to Bill Self.

It definitely goes both ways - you can't reasonably argue Bill Self is far superior to Huggs, either.  The mere fact that ku and KSU have coaches who are nearly equal is great*.

*for KSU fans
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2006, 11:40:16 AM
He won at Cinncinatti. Winning at KSU will be a piece of cake.

Huggs has never recruited as well as he is now.

That is a scary thought.*

*For ku fans

Check pm's Pitt
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 13, 2006, 11:48:04 AM

Quote
I think the fact that Roy left like he did is why ku fans are praying Huggins leaves KSU in three years.  He broke your poor lil' hearts.

I don't think there's any link between the two situations at all.  And I certainly don't think there are any ku fans who are so scared by Huggins that they are literally praying for him to leave Manhattan.

No.  Pretty sure 95% of ku fans literally get down on their knees and pray that Bob Huggins leaves Manhattan ASAP.


Huggins is a good coach.  He's not a great one, or at least he hasn't been in the past, and there really isn't a body of evidence to suggest that he's a far superior coach to Bill Self.

It definitely goes both ways - you can't reasonably argue Bill Self is far superior to Huggs, either.  The mere fact that ku and KSU have coaches who are nearly equal is great*.

*for KSU fans

You're right.  It can't be reasonably argued that Self is a far superior coach to Huggins. 

I think, however, that he does have a significant head start in terms of recruiting, program status, etc.  I think that Huggy really NEEDS Walker, Mayo, and Beasley to end up on campus for a year, because if those three were in Manhattan, as hard as it is for me to admit, KSU would have a hell of a shot at a deep tourney run.  That could kickstart recruiting and provide momentum that Huggy could use to restore KSU's basketball status.

What I don't understand, however, is the KSU mentality (At least my perception of it) that KSU's rise coincides with ku's fall.  There really aren't any indicators of this coming to pass.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: waks on September 13, 2006, 11:51:25 AM
basketball board :jerkoff:
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2006, 11:56:51 AM
Quote
I think, however, that he does have a significant head start in terms of recruiting, program status, etc.  I think that Huggy really NEEDS Walker, Mayo, and Beasley to end up on campus for a year, because if those three were in Manhattan, as hard as it is for me to admit, KSU would have a hell of a shot at a deep tourney run.  That could kickstart recruiting and provide momentum that Huggy could use to restore KSU's basketball status.
Huggins is going to have a better first "full year" recruiting class than Self.  No question.  He'll land a recruit ranked higher than any Self recruit, and a recruit that ranks only behind Julian Wright, and he has a decent shot at the #1 recruit in the country.  He's also in on a ton of top 40 talent for 2008.  From 2007 on, recruiting will likely be a wash.

What I don't understand, however, is the KSU mentality (At least my perception of it) that KSU's rise coincides with ku's fall.  There really aren't any indicators of this coming to pass.

No one thinks ku is falling more than they already have since Roy left.  ku fans invented this mentality...sys put it well:

Quote
why would you assume ku will fall merely because ksu rises? that goes beyond concern and touches on insecurity. y'all have too much tradition to be so small-minded.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 13, 2006, 12:04:56 PM
Quote
I think, however, that he does have a significant head start in terms of recruiting, program status, etc.  I think that Huggy really NEEDS Walker, Mayo, and Beasley to end up on campus for a year, because if those three were in Manhattan, as hard as it is for me to admit, KSU would have a hell of a shot at a deep tourney run.  That could kickstart recruiting and provide momentum that Huggy could use to restore KSU's basketball status.
Huggins is going to have a better first "full year" recruiting class than Self.  No question.  He'll land a recruit ranked higher than any Self recruit, and a recruit that ranks only behind Julian Wright, and he has a decent shot at the #1 recruit in the country.  He's also in on a ton of top 40 talent for 2008.  From 2007 on, recruiting will likely be a wash.

What I don't understand, however, is the KSU mentality (At least my perception of it) that KSU's rise coincides with ku's fall.  There really aren't any indicators of this coming to pass.

No one thinks ku is falling more than they already have since Roy left.  ku fans invented this mentality...sys put it well:

Quote
why would you assume ku will fall merely because ksu rises? that goes beyond concern and touches on insecurity. y'all have too much tradition to be so small-minded.

Hmmm.  I think attributing Huggy's first recruiting class solely to his innate recruiting ability, which is what you seem to be doing, is wrong.  I think this first class is an anomaly, and has to be considered as such until class #2 starts to solidify.  Huggins operated from outside the boundaries of NCAA Regulations to assist in his relationship-building with Mayo and Walker.  Now, please note that I'm not condemning that action; if Self were in a similar situation as Huggins, I'd have wanted him to do the exact same thing.  But it does skew the perception of his actual ability to recruit a bit.

I'll wait to judge Huggins as a recruiter, especially in comparison to Self, until he's under the same limitations and restrictions.

As far as the idea of ku falling being a ku invention, perhaps that is the case.  I disagree, because that's not what the purple flood over on Phog.net seems to say.  It's possible, however, that my Crimson and Blue glasses are skewing things.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2006, 12:19:02 PM
Hmmm.  I think attributing Huggy's first recruiting class solely to his innate recruiting ability, which is what you seem to be doing, is wrong.  I think this first class is an anomaly, and has to be considered as such until class #2 starts to solidify.  Huggins operated from outside the boundaries of NCAA Regulations to assist in his relationship-building with Mayo and Walker.  Now, please note that I'm not condemning that action; if Self were in a similar situation as Huggins, I'd have wanted him to do the exact same thing.  But it does skew the perception of his actual ability to recruit a bit.
He had Walker and Mayo long before he took his year off.  You know they're both from Huntington, WV, right?  I'm also assuming you also know where North College Hill is located. 

Also, like I said, Huggins is already in on a great deal of top 40 talent for 2008.

As far as the idea of ku falling being a ku invention, perhaps that is the case.  I disagree, because that's not what the purple flood over on Phog.net seems to say.  It's possible, however, that my Crimson and Blue glasses are skewing things.

You probably are reading too much into KSU fans' comments.  When I was allowed to post on phog.net, I never said ku was going to get worse because of Huggins, or that KSU would instantly be in the Final Four, but judging from responses, that's how my posts were interpereted.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: PittsburgJayhawk on September 13, 2006, 12:23:57 PM
Hmmm.  I think attributing Huggy's first recruiting class solely to his innate recruiting ability, which is what you seem to be doing, is wrong.  I think this first class is an anomaly, and has to be considered as such until class #2 starts to solidify.  Huggins operated from outside the boundaries of NCAA Regulations to assist in his relationship-building with Mayo and Walker.  Now, please note that I'm not condemning that action; if Self were in a similar situation as Huggins, I'd have wanted him to do the exact same thing.  But it does skew the perception of his actual ability to recruit a bit.
He had Walker and Mayo long before he took his year off.  You know they're both from Huntington, WV, right?  I'm also assuming you also know where North College Hill is located. 

Also, like I said, Huggins is already in on a great deal of top 40 talent for 2008.

As far as the idea of ku falling being a ku invention, perhaps that is the case.  I disagree, because that's not what the purple flood over on Phog.net seems to say.  It's possible, however, that my Crimson and Blue glasses are skewing things.

You probably are reading too much into KSU fans' comments.  When I was allowed to post on phog.net, I never said ku was going to get worse because of Huggins, or that KSU would instantly be in the Final Four, but judging from responses, that's how my posts were interpereted.

It was my understanding that Walker an Mayo both played their high school ball in Cincinnatti.  Is this not true?

I understand that Huggy is in on a great deal of 2008 talent as well, though I think that in order for him to continue to recruit at the level he is now (Beasley, Mayo, Walker, etc.), he's going to have to a) land the big 3, or at least two of them, and b) win while he has them in town.

ku fans love to harp on this, to exhaustion, but I don't think it's an unreasonable point: It's unlikely that Mayo and Walker, at the very least, will be in Manhattan very long.

Essentially, I think Huggy's window for success (Meaning, his ability to make KSU elite) is smaller than KSU fans are thinking.  But if he does hit a homerun, there's no reason why KSU can't be competing with ku not only for recruits, but for national standing, prestige, etc.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: pissclams on September 13, 2006, 12:32:59 PM
Quote
I'll wait to judge Huggins as a recruiter, especially in comparison to Self, until he's under the same limitations and restrictions.
Why ignore the past? By past I'm speaking not of his year away from NCAA rules & regulations on recruiting; I'm talking about his years at Cincinatti?  Is it easier to ignore the fact that 9 of his last 10 recruiting classes at UC were ranked in the Top 10 instead of accept it? GMAFB.
 :violin:
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: michigancat on September 13, 2006, 12:35:03 PM
It was my understanding that Walker an Mayo both played their high school ball in Cincinnatti.  Is this not true?

Yeah, but they're both from Huntington, WV.  I wonder why they ended up in Cincinnati?

Quote
I understand that Huggy is in on a great deal of 2008 talent as well, though I think that in order for him to continue to recruit at the level he is now (Beasley, Mayo, Walker, etc.), he's going to have to a) land the big 3, or at least two of them, and b) win while he has them in town.

Well, so far, so good.

Quote
Essentially, I think Huggy's window for success (Meaning, his ability to make KSU elite) is smaller than KSU fans are thinking.  But if he does hit a homerun, there's no reason why KSU can't be competing with ku not only for recruits, but for national standing, prestige, etc.

To me, Huggins is successful even if he doesn't make KSU "elite".  Before KSU hired Huggins, my stated goal for KSU Men's basketball was to be firmly in the NCAA tournament every year.  I'm sure Bob disagrees with me, but anything above that is just a freaking bonus.  I'll be quite happy if Huggins goes back to signing a couple top 100 players a year and losing to lower seeds in the NCAA tournament.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: ksuno1stunner on September 13, 2006, 12:40:27 PM
It was my understanding that Walker an Mayo both played their high school ball in Cincinnatti.  Is this not true?

Yeah, but they're both from Huntington, WV.  I wonder why they ended up in Cincinnati?

Quote
I understand that Huggy is in on a great deal of 2008 talent as well, though I think that in order for him to continue to recruit at the level he is now (Beasley, Mayo, Walker, etc.), he's going to have to a) land the big 3, or at least two of them, and b) win while he has them in town.

Well, so far, so good.

Quote
Essentially, I think Huggy's window for success (Meaning, his ability to make KSU elite) is smaller than KSU fans are thinking.  But if he does hit a homerun, there's no reason why KSU can't be competing with ku not only for recruits, but for national standing, prestige, etc.

To me, Huggins is successful even if he doesn't make KSU "elite".  Before KSU hired Huggins, my stated goal for KSU Men's basketball was to be firmly in the NCAA tournament every year.  I'm sure Bob disagrees with me, but anything above that is just a freaking bonus.  I'll be quite happy if Huggins goes back to signing a couple top 100 players a year and losing to lower seeds in the NCAA tournament.

if ksu experiences the success he's had at cincy i'll crap a canary

and it appears we'll have a good chance of living up to the expectations cincy had
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 13, 2006, 12:40:47 PM
Rusty ... you're throwing a big wet blanket on my hopes for a 1000 page thread on "I want a National Championship".

 :forked:

Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: pissclams on September 13, 2006, 12:41:48 PM
MCMW
2155
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: waks on September 13, 2006, 04:33:15 PM
Quote
I'll wait to judge Huggins as a recruiter, especially in comparison to Self, until he's under the same limitations and restrictions.
Why ignore the past? By past I'm speaking not of his year away from NCAA rules & regulations on recruiting; I'm talking about his years at Cincinatti?  Is it easier to ignore the fact that 9 of his last 10 recruiting classes at UC were ranked in the Top 10 instead of accept it? GMAFB.
 :violin:
he's obviously a good recruiter. atleast he knows how to get players wherever the hell he wants to. what other coach would have been able to organize what Huggs is doing with the Walker situation??? HUGGINS = Genius.
Title: Re: Hi.
Post by: Andy on September 14, 2006, 03:07:06 AM
the reason i believe huggs will continue to recruit at the highest level is all the connections he has with aau coaches and prep schools.  fostering those relationships while he was out of work has to be the biggest advantage he created/improved upon.  one that can be easily maintained.