KSUFans Archives

Sports => Frank Martin's OOD sponsored by the "Angriest Fans in America" => Topic started by: ksuno1stunner on May 08, 2007, 01:46:38 PM

Title: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: ksuno1stunner on May 08, 2007, 01:46:38 PM
We basically traded Bennett (maybe Kent and Yearby) for Samuels and V-Dub.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: sys on May 08, 2007, 01:52:46 PM
We basically traded Bennett (maybe Kent and Yearby) for Samuels and V-Dub.

this board and gpc* were far happier about bennett last spring than they are samuels and d'sky this year.





* - myself excluded
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: ksuno1stunner on May 08, 2007, 01:56:22 PM
We basically traded Bennett (maybe Kent and Yearby) for Samuels and V-Dub.

this board and gpc* were far happier about bennett last spring than they are samuels and d'sky this year.





* - myself excluded

It was the whole 5 star thing though.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: ksu_FAN on May 08, 2007, 01:57:46 PM
We basically traded Bennett (maybe Kent and Yearby) for Samuels and V-Dub.

this board and gpc* were far happier about bennett last spring than they are samuels and d'sky this year.





* - myself excluded

Come on sys, we all know hindsight is 20/20. :)
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: chum1 on May 08, 2007, 01:59:01 PM
I'm just waiting to see how each and every one of these recruits will come in and make a big impact next year like nearly everyone seems to think they will.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: doom on May 08, 2007, 02:02:41 PM
I'm just waiting to see how each and every one of these recruits will come in and make a big impact next year like nearly everyone seems to think they will.

Not all of them will.  Some will surprise and some will disappoint.  But we have so many decent recruits that we should be loaded.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: Saulbadguy on May 08, 2007, 02:03:44 PM
I'm just waiting to see how each and every one of these recruits will come in and make a big impact next year like nearly everyone seems to think they will.
Jason Bennett, Blake Young, Luis Colon.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: sys on May 08, 2007, 02:03:56 PM
Come on sys, we all know hindsight is 20/20. :)

reminding everyone about my remarkablely prescient opinion of bennett eases the pain of c1 labelling me a loser
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: tmramrod91 on May 08, 2007, 02:05:40 PM
I was more excited bout JB at the time bc, as said before, he was a 5 star and i didnt think that could exist in a ksu uniform.
However, after watching the open scrimmage of him, that excitement quickly turned into...wow, he's not very good.

All of the guys wont live up to the hype, but the more you get the better the odds are that someone will

They all cant suck can they?   :hope:
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: pufizzle on May 08, 2007, 02:09:40 PM
I have a feeling one or two of them might turn out to be Curtis Allen type players.  Pretty athletic but don't help too much in the first year or two.  If Allen would have stayed around I think he would have been a hell of a player though.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: ksuno1stunner on May 08, 2007, 02:12:03 PM
I'm just waiting to see how each and every one of these recruits will come in and make a big impact next year like nearly everyone seems to think they will.
Jason Bennett, Blake Young, Luis Colon.

Blake Young did start playing better near the end of the season.  When he did a 20 foot jump stop and tried to dunk on someone, I figured he was close to being back.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: chum1 on May 08, 2007, 02:12:45 PM
reminding everyone about my remarkablely prescient opinion of bennett eases the pain of c1 labelling me a loser

There are two kinds of people in this world.  No one calls this guy a loser:

(http://images.forbes.com/media/lists/53/2006/U5WX.jpg)
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: Saulbadguy on May 08, 2007, 02:15:09 PM
I'm just waiting to see how each and every one of these recruits will come in and make a big impact next year like nearly everyone seems to think they will.
Jason Bennett, Blake Young, Luis Colon.

Blake Young did start playing better near the end of the season.  When he did a 20 foot jump stop and tried to dunk on someone, I figured he was close to being back.
True. 
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: sys on May 08, 2007, 02:20:50 PM
There are two kinds of people in this world.  No one calls this guy a loser:

(http://images.forbes.com/media/lists/53/2006/U5WX.jpg)

i think i lose again.  i don't know how to respond to that.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: ksu_FAN on May 08, 2007, 02:22:26 PM
There are two kinds of people in this world.  No one calls this guy a loser:

(http://images.forbes.com/media/lists/53/2006/U5WX.jpg)

i think i lose again.  i don't know how to respond to that.

Well I'm sure of two things; a) you have better hair and b) you have less money.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: sys on May 08, 2007, 02:28:09 PM
Well I'm sure of two things; a) you have better less hair and b) you have less better money.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: Trog on May 08, 2007, 02:35:54 PM
I have a feeling one or two of them might turn out to be Curtis Allen type players. 

I'm hoping for a Curtis Redding type player myself :love:
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: fatty fat fat on May 08, 2007, 03:17:39 PM
sys, you are awful.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: sys on May 08, 2007, 03:24:51 PM
sys, you are awful accurate.
Title: Re: Martin is IMO better than Huggins
Post by: ksu_FAN on May 08, 2007, 03:28:22 PM
sys, eres perdedor nato.

At least that's what I read on wikipedia.  :peek: