Author Topic: pullen numbers  (Read 8231 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
pullen numbers
« on: December 21, 2010, 12:02:46 PM »
     %min  ortg   %shot  efg%  or%  dr%  arate  torate  stl%  ftrate       ft             2pt fg         3ptfg
                              
Sr   74.5   104.6   29.2   47.2   2.6   10.8   26.4   19.5   3.5   43.4   45-63(.714)  37-78(.474)  21-67(.313)
Jr   77.9   118.7   28.2   53.3   1.5   7.8    22.2   16.8    3.2   51.5   203-247(.822)  91-202(.450) 110-278(.396)
So  74.7   101.7   26.2   47.3   2.6   7.7    21.4   22.0    3.0   31.0   91-125(.728)  78-179(.436)  75-224(.335)
Fr   58.0   102.7   22.4   47.6   1.1   5.4    25.1   22.2    2.9   34.2   63-92(.685)  68-137(.496)  40-132(.303)

the bolding is mostly just to make things easier to read.


anyways, i'm posting this because there is a sense across goEMAW, gpc & elsewhere that pullen is playing significantly worse than was expected.  if that is true, it was the expectations that failed, not pullen.  his numbers in almost all categories can be seen to be in line with his historical averages (even accounting for trends of improvement with age).

if you wish to look for categories where he might reasonably be expected to improve, and which would positively impact his offensive rating, i think you are basically only talking about three items - free throw rate, shot selection (in this case, shooting more 3s), and 3pt%.



(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
« Last Edit: December 21, 2010, 12:34:40 PM by sys »
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2010, 12:22:29 PM »
Great post sys.  Really only the Duke (maybe Wash St) game has been a disappointing game for Pullen, he's been fine outside of that.  Here is his team impact chart from statsheet (similar to what sys posted, a bit different) that shows the only dropoff he's had is 3PT shooting.

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12302
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2010, 12:34:57 PM »
I completely expected him to pick up all of denis scoring.

Offline FHSU92

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2010, 12:43:49 PM »
While his #'s are not different than his FR/SO campaigns, I would expect them to be at least the same and slightly better in a few categories given he's a yr older and tabbed as an AA.

So, while he's not performing much different than he has in prior years, he's not living up to expectations - which will hurt his NBA draft stock, which wasn't too high to begin with.

He needs Energy's energy (or, whoever is playing the point needs that E).  He tries to play too cool, which is fine when you're up by 10 and shooting > 40% beyond the arc, but when you're down 10 and shooting 20%, if that, from the arc he needs to get steals and force TOs.   

Offline Poster formerly known as jthutch

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1766
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2010, 12:45:28 PM »
While his #'s are not different than his FR/SO campaigns, I would expect them to be at least the same and slightly better in a few categories given he's a yr older and tabbed as an AA.

So, while he's not performing much different than he has in prior years, he's not living up to expectations - which will hurt his NBA draft stock, which wasn't too high to begin with.

He needs Energy's energy (or, whoever is playing the point needs that E).  He tries to play too cool, which is fine when you're up by 10 and shooting > 40% beyond the arc, but when you're down 10 and shooting 20%, if that, from the arc he needs to get steals and force TOs.   

THIS

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2010, 12:55:34 PM »
it's times like these when i hate our fans most of all.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2010, 12:58:53 PM »
Pullen's playing significantly worse this season, as you can see by the stats.  His Ortg is down 14 points, his free throw percentage is down ~11%, and his 3-point percentage is down ~8%.  He needs someone to step up at point guard, because he's not nearly the same player when he's not playing off the ball. 

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2010, 12:59:24 PM »
looks like recruiting experts nailed it again in their evalution of Jake 4 years ago.  

dear idiots, stars matter.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2010, 01:00:21 PM »
3 PT. shooting is a disapointment because of the way we saw him shoot against BYU/Xavier and that's what was most fresh in our minds.  I'm still confident he's going to have a 1st team all conference season.  

Wasn't Denis shooting like 27% from 3 at this point last year and everyone melting down about it?  Yes, I know, not you SD.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2010, 01:01:10 PM »
He needs someone to step up at point guard, because he's not nearly the same player when he's not playing off the ball. 

imagine that, bmw clinging to a talking point, irregardless of evidence for or against.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2010, 01:02:06 PM »
Pullen's playing significantly worse this season, as you can see by the stats.  His Ortg is down 14 points, his free throw percentage is down ~11%, and his 3-point percentage is down ~8%.  He needs someone to step up at point guard, because he's not nearly the same player when he's not playing off the ball.  

While true, even worse play by Kelly (and in some games Samuels) is hurting this team far more than Pullen, even in most of his poor shooting games.

3 PT. shooting is a disapointment because of the way we saw him shoot against BYU/Xavier and that's what was most fresh in our minds.  I'm still confident he's going to have a 1st team all conference season.  

Wasn't Denis shooting like 27% from 3 at this point last year and everyone melting down about it?  Yes, I know, not you SD.

Yes.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2010, 01:02:45 PM »
Wasn't Denis shooting like 27% from 3 at this point last year and everyone melting down about it?  Yes, I know, not you SD.

yes.  it wasn't until martin moved him off-ball that he was finally able to hit a few threes.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #12 on: December 21, 2010, 01:03:28 PM »
Wasn't Denis shooting like 27% from 3 at this point last year and everyone melting down about it?  Yes, I know, not you SD.

yes.  it wasn't until martin moved him off-ball that he was finally able to hit a few threes.

Now THAT is good bbsing. 

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #13 on: December 21, 2010, 01:05:50 PM »
He needs someone to step up at point guard, because he's not nearly the same player when he's not playing off the ball. 

imagine that, bmw clinging to a talking point, irregardless of evidence for or against.



"Irregardless."  


 :lol:



Statistical evidence shows that Pullen's scoring numbers are down, his free throw numbers are down, his field goal numbers are down, his 3-point numbers are down, and his turnover rate is higher.  But, but, but... it's just a phog.net talking point!!!!

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #14 on: December 21, 2010, 01:08:05 PM »
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2010, 01:10:44 PM »
Statistical evidence shows that Pullen's scoring numbers are down, his free throw numbers are down, his field goal numbers are down, his 3-point numbers are down, and his turnover rate is higher.  But, but, but... it's just a phog.net talking point!!!!

not just a phog.net talking point.  a lot of idiots in other places also convinced themselves that a career pg with combo skills could only play at the nominal "2" in kstate's offense.  it's Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), but phog.net hasn't yet monopolized retardation.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2010, 01:11:56 PM »
aren't  there some numbers that would tell us what to expect regarding  the relationship between fan expectations and numbers?  because it looks like we could use some.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2010, 01:16:25 PM »
I'm not entirely positive, but I'm fairly sure using FT% as evidence that moving back to PG has hurt Pullen is something an idiot would do.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59533
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #18 on: December 21, 2010, 01:20:04 PM »
Statistical evidence shows that Pullen's scoring numbers are down, his free throw numbers are down, his field goal numbers are down, his 3-point numbers are down, and his turnover rate is higher.  But, but, but... it's just a phog.net talking point!!!!

not just a phog.net talking point.  a lot of idiots in other places also convinced themselves that a career pg with combo skills could only play at the nominal "2" in kstate's offense.  it's Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), but phog.net hasn't yet monopolized retardation.

Never, ever sell Tardville short in these areas.


Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #19 on: December 21, 2010, 01:27:42 PM »
"Irregardless."  


 :lol:

what a dumbass.



Wow... you are dumber than a box of bricks.  Looks like that K-State education really paid off, Mr. Contrarian.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #20 on: December 21, 2010, 01:30:08 PM »
I'm not entirely positive, but I'm fairly sure using FT% as evidence that moving back to PG has hurt Pullen is something an idiot would do.


I was just pointing out that his overall numbers are down this year, which only someone with an extremely small penis would deny.  His free throw rate is down as well, which indicates to me that he's trying to distribute the ball more, instead of looking to score and draw a foul.  But, but, but... deny the fact that KU fans were right at all costs!!!!!

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #21 on: December 21, 2010, 01:38:15 PM »
Wow... you are dumber than a box of bricks.

 :lol:
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #22 on: December 21, 2010, 01:39:41 PM »
I was just pointing out that his overall numbers are down this year, which only someone with an extremely small penis would deny.  His free throw rate is down as well, which indicates to me that he's trying to distribute the ball more, instead of looking to score and draw a foul.

his shot% is up and he's attempting a higher proportion of 2s than 3s compared to last year, dumbass.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #23 on: December 21, 2010, 01:41:20 PM »
I was just pointing out that his overall numbers are down this year, which only someone with an extremely small penis would deny.  His free throw rate is down as well, which indicates to me that he's trying to distribute the ball more, instead of looking to score and draw a foul.

his shot% is up and he's attempting a higher proportion of 2s than 3s compared to last year, dumbass.



Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, your a moran.


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88568
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: pullen numbers
« Reply #24 on: December 21, 2010, 01:43:03 PM »
well, beems apparently missed the irregardless thread