Author Topic: Arthur Brown  (Read 11423 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42632
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #25 on: December 15, 2010, 10:49:23 PM »
Consider the source.  D Scott.

I mean, this gullible doofus didn't have the professional judgement to not run a Zach Kendall player quote this summer stating our offense being as unstoppable as "techmo bowl" (sic).  It's amazing how much credence he continues, after all the years, to put into the stupid statements of 19 year old kids.






Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #26 on: December 15, 2010, 10:56:14 PM »
:horrorsurprise:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42632
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #27 on: December 15, 2010, 11:15:30 PM »
'909, 'grats on homeboy status.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32538
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #28 on: December 16, 2010, 08:04:47 AM »
damn if only 42 hadn't deleted his account maybe he could do a reclassification of wabash to homeboy
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #29 on: December 16, 2010, 08:50:58 AM »
THE POON LAGOON WILL NOT STAND FOR YOUR crap

Very curious to see the future of this BBSer

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #30 on: December 16, 2010, 09:24:15 AM »
but really, Arthur Brown did jack crap at Miami, and they are as equally as sucky as that Cats.


Offline PoetWarrior

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #31 on: December 16, 2010, 09:42:43 AM »
Arthur,

We appreciate you, so very much.

Your true friend,

PoetWarrior


P.S.
We are certain you will succeed.

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #32 on: December 16, 2010, 09:44:42 AM »
Wait till Rocky posts his Aurthur Brown story.  :lynchmob: :lynchmob:
RIP Fatty

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #33 on: December 16, 2010, 10:53:28 AM »
Consider the source.  D Scott.

I mean, this gullible doofus didn't have the professional judgement to not run a Zach Kendall player quote this summer stating our offense being as unstoppable as "techmo bowl" (sic).  It's amazing how much credence he continues, after all the years, to put into the stupid statements of 19 year old kids.







 :love:

Wow. Thanks so much for the certificate, Trim!

Appreciate you.


Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #34 on: December 16, 2010, 11:00:25 AM »
I have it on good word (from someone on the team - A+++ source) that Arthur Brown will be better than Lawrence Taylor.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #35 on: December 16, 2010, 11:31:27 AM »
THE POON LAGOON WILL NOT STAND FOR YOUR cac


But seriously, Kendalls' penalties were horrid this year.  He has to be dumb.

I don't think Limestone has said anything untrue that wouldn't back up his ultimate assertion.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42632
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #36 on: December 16, 2010, 12:10:41 PM »
Consider the source.  D Scott.

I mean, this gullible doofus didn't have the professional judgement to not run a Zach Kendall player quote this summer stating our offense being as unstoppable as "techmo bowl" (sic).  It's amazing how much credence he continues, after all the years, to put into the stupid statements of 19 year old kids.







 :love:

Wow. Thanks so much for the certificate, Trim!

Appreciate you.




No need to thank me.  All credit goes to D.Scott for vigilantly reading goEMAW, recognizing your constructive criticism and tweeting you the appropriate shout-out.  Prayers to all.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20652
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #37 on: December 16, 2010, 12:24:41 PM »
I bet a lot of defensive players look amazing to ZK

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30954
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #38 on: December 16, 2010, 12:33:47 PM »
I bet a lot of defensive players look amazing to ZK

The second part of the quote was left out, unfortunately....

Quote
Ya, he's dominant.  Like when Carsy calls his own number on the zone read, Carsy can never beat Arthur around the edge.  I mean it's the same play that we chews the 1's up with on regular basis and we can't even run it against the scout team.  Watching Arthur is like playing NFL Blitz.

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #39 on: December 16, 2010, 12:43:05 PM »
lot of squawks in this thread  :goodbyecruelworld:

Offline wazucat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 411
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #40 on: December 16, 2010, 12:57:26 PM »
Who knows if Brown will be worth a crap as a LB for us, but to assume he is not more athletic and faster than any other candidate on our squad is rather narrow minded IMO.  He may be Marvin Simmons revision 2 for all we know but can't we hope that might not be the case?  :thumbsup:

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13891
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #41 on: December 16, 2010, 01:00:47 PM »
I have it on good word (from someone on the team - A+++ source) that Arthur Brown will be better than Lawrence Taylor.

He will be THE reason teams will want a right tackle that is as good as their left.  No one expects the OTHER blind side.

Offline kstatefreak42

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2911
    • View Profile
EMAW

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #43 on: December 16, 2010, 01:41:09 PM »
I have it on good word (from someone on the team - A+++ source) that Arthur Brown will be better than Lawrence Taylor.

He will be THE reason teams will want a right tackle that is as good as their left.  No one expects the OTHER blind side.

Not being facetious...

Brown + Walker + Garrett at LB/S hybrid isn't a bad lineup at all.  That's serviceable talent at the very least.

If Burns is a decent player as a transfer safety, and Zimmerman gets better, those are five solid starters.

Everything on the edge, and the subsequent depth behind them, is frightening, but that's a solid starting five there.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #44 on: December 16, 2010, 01:47:24 PM »
Thought Garrett was a senior?  Also- Slaughter and Childs both looked solid at times this year.  Burns is a quality safety.  Corners will be fine but the DL is still a huge question.  Boyd and Meshak and ????

Offline kstatefreak42

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2911
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #45 on: December 16, 2010, 01:49:13 PM »
B.Harold.
EMAW

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #46 on: December 16, 2010, 02:01:08 PM »
Harold wsn't even starting on this year's horrible defense.  I have basically given up on that POS.  Maybe Davis can play DE opposite Meshak?

Offline kstatefreak42

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2911
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #47 on: December 16, 2010, 02:03:31 PM »
Hopefully that niggas back will hold up.
EMAW

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #48 on: December 16, 2010, 02:10:35 PM »
Harold wsn't even starting on this year's horrible defense.  I have basically given up on that POS.  Maybe Davis can play DE opposite Meshak?

Assuming his back is fine, my guess is that he'll play WDE to Harold as the SDE.  Meshak will play in obvious passing situations.

Unless Williams picks up 15-20 in the off season, I don't think he's going to be an every down player.  He's going to be like Von Miller in his impact as a hands down lineman.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2010, 02:13:57 PM by Panjandrum »

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: Arthur Brown
« Reply #49 on: December 16, 2010, 02:16:54 PM »
I have it on good word (from someone on the team - A+++ source) that Arthur Brown will be better than Lawrence Taylor.

He will be THE reason teams will want a right tackle that is as good as their left.  No one expects the OTHER blind side.

Not being facetious...

Brown + Walker + Garrett at LB/S hybrid isn't a bad lineup at all.  That's serviceable talent at the very least.

If Burns is a decent player as a transfer safety, and Zimmerman gets better, those are five solid starters.

Everything on the edge, and the subsequent depth behind them, is frightening, but that's a solid starting five there.
Problem is, who's servicing them? Chris Cosh  :ck: