Author Topic: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?  (Read 5512 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37978
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2010, 06:20:34 PM »
If we won the war on Mexico, we could just annex the country and call it 'Merico.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32489
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2010, 07:18:03 PM »
If we won the war on Mexico, we could just annex the country and call it 'Merico.


We called them texas arizona california etc the first time around.  Might as well go for more state type names
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12293
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2010, 07:26:45 PM »
If we won the war on Mexico, we could just annex the country and call it 'Merico.


We called them texas arizona california etc the first time around.  Might as well go for more state type names

Do not want

Offline AzCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 966
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2010, 11:19:35 PM »
It's just a giant rough ridin' marijuana plantation anyway.  Might as well make it official.   :users:

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38047
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2010, 10:34:29 AM »
If we invade MX and land grab, I am moving to Mazatlan or south of Cancun.

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2010, 11:08:35 AM »
Failing to see how "surrendering the war on drugs" is a bad thing. It's been a mess for 2 decades.

Maybe all the idiots buying Mexican dirt weed should smoke better crap.

Offline AzCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 966
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2010, 11:16:45 AM »
Since the root cause of Mexico's problems is Mexicans (in a way very much analagous to the true and correct view that the root cause of crime is criminals) we're going to have to do something about the existing population.  Where do you suppose we'll send them?

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38047
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2010, 11:18:56 AM »
Failing to see how "surrendering the war on drugs" is a bad thing. It's been a mess for 2 decades.

Maybe all the idiots buying Mexican dirt weed should smoke better crap.

I am all for stopping the war.  I don't even do any drugs.  I would like to see all that money better spent and for our country to at least benefit from something that is already taking place(drug use).

Saw 60 minutes(or some such show) this week.  They had a deal on Tenn or Kentucky(don't remember which), but they said that the illegally grown weed in their mountains is equal to 3x the state's tobacco crop.

All that weed is getting planted, harvested, processed, bought, sold, and used already.  There is a lot of money being lost by the gov in keeping their head in the sand.

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12293
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2010, 12:30:51 PM »

Thinking about it some more maybe we could make them a territory instead of a state, kinda like puerto rico.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38047
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #10 on: December 15, 2010, 12:56:08 PM »

Thinking about it some more maybe we could make them a territory instead of a state, kinda like puerto rico.

I'm not moving to a rough ridin' territory.  State or nothing.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2010, 01:21:20 PM »
If we make them a state, you can pretty much pencil in Jorge Jesus Gonzalez in as the next president.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38047
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #12 on: December 15, 2010, 01:47:06 PM »
If we make them a state, you can pretty much pencil in Jorge Jesus Gonzalez in as the next president.

Couldn't give a eff.  Moving to a soon-to-be awesome place.  JJG may be pretty solid?  Couldn't hurt at this point.

Offline Goldbrick

  • American by birth, Republican by the grace of God
  • Point Plank'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 226
    • View Profile
Re: Which would be worse: Invading Mexico or Surrendering the War on Drugs?
« Reply #13 on: December 16, 2010, 04:38:25 PM »
If we make them a state, you can pretty much pencil in Jorge Jesus Gonzalez in as the next president.

Most liberals would respond with 'and the problem with that is?'