Author Topic: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?  (Read 14932 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18041
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #50 on: December 13, 2010, 03:07:50 PM »
I like how national titles and this "tradition" are weighted as the same

AND KU STILL CAME OUT AHEAD  :horrorsurprise:

Offline Dirty Deeds

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 282
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #51 on: December 13, 2010, 03:18:56 PM »
Need another category for D league All Stars.


Signed,

Denis Clemente

(and-soon-to-be Jacob Pullen)
We recruit D league players efftard.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #52 on: December 13, 2010, 03:27:35 PM »
glad our fans aren't prone to spewing self-inflating pablum.  because we have a great deal we could annoy the rest of the big 12 with.  inventing the tutor, for example.

Quote
These kids get a ton of academic support to help them through school (KSU was an innovator in this area, and the rest of the nation has followed suit with their student-athletes).
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline FP TC etc.

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2301
  • USA! USA! USA!
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #53 on: December 13, 2010, 06:19:20 PM »
Denis isn't in the d-league  :ck:

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #54 on: December 13, 2010, 07:58:18 PM »
Need another category for D league All Stars.


Signed,

Denis Clemente

(and-soon-to-be Jacob Pullen)

Missed where we were trying to be the bluest?

Also I had to research what a Helms title actually was.  :frown:

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9940
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #55 on: December 13, 2010, 09:15:45 PM »
Need another category for D league All Stars.


Signed,

Denis Clemente

(and-soon-to-be Jacob Pullen)

Missed where we were trying to be the bluest?

Also I had to research what a Helms title actually was.  :frown:
It's a pretty LOLworthy day when you actually take the time to research what a Helms title actually is. 

person who reads what a Helms title is for the first time = :lol: :lol: :lol:
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline blowthewhistle

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 57
  • The pride of the Warhawks
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #56 on: December 13, 2010, 11:54:27 PM »
Beems, congrats on taking home the weighted titles of tradition and home court advantage

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4204
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #57 on: December 14, 2010, 01:47:10 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #58 on: December 14, 2010, 02:08:51 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #59 on: December 14, 2010, 02:14:33 PM »
The University of Kansas needs to be docked several points for being on probation during, or around the same time it won its 3 National Titles.

Does being the only school to not be allowed to defend one of its titles fall under "Tradition"?
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9940
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #60 on: December 14, 2010, 02:16:28 PM »
The University of Kansas needs to be docked several points for being on probation during, or around the same time it won its 3 National Titles.

Does being the only school to not be allowed to defend one of its titles fall under "Tradition"?
It falls under "haters", which fortunately for KU fans provides positive points.
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47909
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #61 on: December 14, 2010, 02:18:19 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking.  

:dunno:


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #62 on: December 14, 2010, 02:37:26 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking.  

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47909
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #63 on: December 14, 2010, 02:38:59 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #64 on: December 14, 2010, 02:49:01 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18041
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #65 on: December 14, 2010, 03:20:33 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to arbitrarily claim the best tradition and that it is worth as much as someone who has won over twice as many titles

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #66 on: December 14, 2010, 03:30:52 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking.  

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
:surprised: :horrorsurprise:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47909
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #67 on: December 14, 2010, 03:31:53 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to arbitrarily claim the best tradition and that it is worth as much as someone who has won over twice as many titles

that's pretty much where i was at, thanks chicat.  as always bitb.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #68 on: December 14, 2010, 03:35:05 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to arbitrarily claim the best tradition and that it is worth as much as someone who has won over twice as many titles

that's pretty much where i was at, thanks chicat.  as always bitb.

You guys will just never get it.... Don't you understand that KU hired the guy who stole credit for inventing the game, thereby everyone who is ever a fan of KU will always know far more about basketball than anyone else ever will?

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19402
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #69 on: December 14, 2010, 03:57:31 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to bump them from 3rd to 2nd for no reason.

http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2009/1004/cbe1.pdf
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #70 on: December 14, 2010, 04:11:09 PM »
You can safely ignore the entire analysis when UCLA comes in 4th using the out-of-your-ass scoring system.  11 national titles and 18 Final 4 appearances apparently aren't as strong as the subjective crap measured in that thread.  What a self-delusional joke.



Spoken like someone who doesn't know sh*t about basketball.

this isn't a basketball thread, it's a let's make fun of the typical ku homer thread.  surely you can understand why we think it's hilarious that a bunch of ku bbs'rs have been pulling together a bunch of crap under the guise of analysis and then awarding themselves the bluest of the blue blood ranking. 

:dunno:


ESPN ranked KU the 2nd-best program of all-time a couple years ago.  Obviously they're just biased.


 :jerk:
i guess the guys at waving the wheat know more than the guys at espn



Yeah, it takes a real homer to bump a program from 2nd to 1st on an arbitrary "best of all-time" list. 

It takes a real homer to arbitrarily claim the best tradition and that it is worth as much as someone who has won over twice as many titles

that's pretty much where i was at, thanks chicat.  as always bitb.



UCLA won 10 of 11 titles in a 12-year span.  They don't have the consistency that programs like KU, Kentucky, and UNC have. 

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18041
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #71 on: December 14, 2010, 04:38:04 PM »
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #72 on: December 14, 2010, 04:43:15 PM »
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent


They didn't even make the NIT last year.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18041
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #73 on: December 14, 2010, 04:48:46 PM »
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent


They didn't even make the NIT last year.

:horrorsurprise:  The 11 national titles are invalidated then.  Tear down the banners!!! 

Was there a category for at least making the NIT last year?  Are we sure its weighted enough?

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: The Bluest of the Blue Bloods?
« Reply #74 on: December 14, 2010, 04:54:26 PM »
Three consecutive final fours from 2006-08.  Pretty inconsistent


They didn't even make the NIT last year.

:horrorsurprise:  The 11 national titles are invalidated then.  Tear down the banners!!! 

Was there a category for at least making the NIT last year?  Are we sure its weighted enough?



It's really not surprising that you're most impressed with the program that had a decade of dominance.  I'm sure they even made a DVD for it.