Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 3996149 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline schreds21

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1200
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75300 on: March 07, 2023, 09:08:08 PM »
My favorite player from those 14 and 15 teams

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7828
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75301 on: March 08, 2023, 10:25:15 PM »
Cain officially retiring as a royal this summer.

:royals:
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12670
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75302 on: March 08, 2023, 10:37:31 PM »
Love it

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14546
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75303 on: March 09, 2023, 05:39:03 PM »
One of, if not my favorite modern day Royals. Prob the top spot.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 26428
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75304 on: March 09, 2023, 06:32:25 PM »
One of the nine billion fun things about the 14-15 Royals was there were so many guys that could be your fav.

Oh your fav is Wade Davis? Congrats, you're a winner
You a Yordano man? Right back at ya
Salvy your guy? Guess you like smiling

etc.

Any answer but James Shields was correct.

Offline schreds21

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1200
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75305 on: March 09, 2023, 07:32:46 PM »
Shields was fine.  He did what he was brought there to do

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 26428
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75306 on: March 09, 2023, 09:45:51 PM »
Shields was fine.  He did what he was brought there to do

Fine is diff than fav worthy

Offline GregKSU1027

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3415
  • Cats, man
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75307 on: March 10, 2023, 08:29:40 AM »
One of the nine billion fun things about the 14-15 Royals was there were so many guys that could be your fav.

Oh your fav is Wade Davis? Congrats, you're a winner
You a Yordano man? Right back at ya
Salvy your guy? Guess you like smiling

etc.

Any answer but James Shields was correct.
I have Yo's autograph. It is one of my my most prized possessions
"Except, odds are, that child will have the chance to return to Disney World while K-State fans will most likely never, ever, ever see Underwood back in Bramlage wearing purple." -Timothy Everson

Offline schreds21

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1200
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75308 on: March 10, 2023, 10:55:53 AM »
Shields was fine.  He did what he was brought there to do

Fine is diff than fav worthy
So you're saying you would have accepted Infante, Aoki, or Rios but not Shields

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9089
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75309 on: March 10, 2023, 10:58:23 AM »
Shields was fine.  He did what he was brought there to do

Fine is diff than fav worthy
So you're saying you would have accepted Infante, Aoki, or Rios but not Shields



Yes

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36314
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75310 on: March 10, 2023, 11:03:47 AM »
That ball was particularly foul.

Offline schreds21

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1200
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #75311 on: March 10, 2023, 04:41:55 PM »
I'm sure that was an easy pop fly but his adventurous route to the ball necessitated the slide and subsequent shot to the jewels.