Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5848320 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32534
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62975 on: June 13, 2016, 09:18:10 PM »
Just let soria finish these scrubs. 
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40568
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62976 on: June 13, 2016, 09:28:56 PM »
Welp

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29368
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62977 on: June 13, 2016, 09:31:08 PM »
currently strapped in

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32534
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62978 on: June 13, 2016, 09:33:28 PM »
Oh crap
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32534
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62979 on: June 13, 2016, 09:40:07 PM »
Soria is getting the 9th I think
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62980 on: June 13, 2016, 09:40:51 PM »
El Toro

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62981 on: June 13, 2016, 09:41:33 PM »
Soria is getting the 9th I think

Idk if it's a good idea to concede the division in June.  We're still in this thing

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40568
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62982 on: June 13, 2016, 09:43:27 PM »
Joba!

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62983 on: June 13, 2016, 09:53:28 PM »
chamberlain looks thinner.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62984 on: June 13, 2016, 09:55:08 PM »
Big DP ball induced by Volkie.  Keeps the lead at 2.

Wade and Herrera pitched the last 2 nights. Be nice if we don't have to use them and get the win.
I think we learned this lesson last week...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Our crappy ass Defense was the main culprit in that game.  I was hopeful we stretch the lead out to 3 or 4 tonight and not use these 2.  But with a 2-0 and 2-1 score, I think you gotta pitch them as long as they felt OK.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62985 on: June 13, 2016, 09:57:59 PM »
 :royals: :royals: :royals:

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62986 on: June 13, 2016, 09:59:05 PM »
3 huge DP balls in the 7th-9th.

The official "Wader, check please" #18

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62987 on: June 13, 2016, 09:59:20 PM »
merriefield is a delight at second base.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62988 on: June 13, 2016, 10:04:16 PM »
a win tmrw nite would be nuts

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40568
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62989 on: June 13, 2016, 10:05:02 PM »
Chris young has like a negative ERA at home this year

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62990 on: June 13, 2016, 10:07:21 PM »
Posse Stat of the night....
Even with our offense really struggling the last 11 games, Whit has scored 15 runs in his 21 starts.
LoCain is the only one who had a better ratio in the last 2+ years.  Lo had 101 runs in 140 games in 2015

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62991 on: June 13, 2016, 10:09:47 PM »
Is this where we bring up sample sizes?
:adios:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62992 on: June 13, 2016, 10:10:05 PM »
Whit has been a delight though
:adios:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32534
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62993 on: June 13, 2016, 10:13:52 PM »
merriefield is a delight at second base.

Hiding him as a mid level prospect in the minors for several years was scary smart by Moore.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62994 on: June 13, 2016, 10:18:51 PM »
Is this where we bring up sample sizes?

Yes, it's a small sample size, but reaching base 20 of 21 starts with 15 runs are small samples I like.
Even Zoby who was an awesome #2 hitter for us only had 37 runs scored in his 59 games.

Whit is here to stay. Boy can play

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62995 on: June 14, 2016, 12:09:06 AM »
Is this where we bring up sample sizes?

Yes, it's a small sample size, but reaching base 20 of 21 starts with 15 runs are small samples I like.
Even Zoby who was an awesome #2 hitter for us only had 37 runs scored in his 59 games.

Whit is here to stay. Boy can play

I agree with PP. Whit is a ballplayer in every sense of the word.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38016
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62996 on: June 14, 2016, 07:24:36 AM »
Is this where we bring up sample sizes?

Yes. He might be even better than we've seen.

 :D

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62997 on: June 14, 2016, 04:17:46 PM »
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/hitter-contact-quality-report-first-base-and-dh/

Quote
Kendrys Morales is much better than his raw numbers to date. Get a load of this one: he’s batting a meager .346 AVG-.423 SLG on line drives through June 2. That’s good for an Unadjusted Liner Contact Score of 26. His Unadjusted Fly, Liner and Grounder Contact Scores of 82, 26 and 83, respectively, are way lower than the corresponding adjusted-for-context marks of 164, 113 and 124. Sure, he’s slow and gets no leg hits, but his contact quality remains well above average, as suggested by his 130 Adjusted Production figure.

Quote
If I had to pick one first basemen for the next five years, I’d take Eric Hosmer. He hits all BIP types very hard, and his fly-ball rate has plenty of room to grow. The K and BB rates are also likely to improve. He’s having a big year with a low liner rate; there’s plenty more in the tank for this budding superstar.
:adios:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62998 on: June 14, 2016, 04:20:55 PM »
I know its at the K and not some bandbox but still.... Chris Young on a humid night........  :sdeek:

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #62999 on: June 14, 2016, 04:23:41 PM »
wife got a pair of free suite tickets. she is taking my kid, i am sad.