Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5788210 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15616
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57600 on: January 06, 2016, 10:07:39 PM »
Still beside myself.  This is the organization we never thought we'd have.  :Crybaby:

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29367
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57601 on: January 06, 2016, 10:47:23 PM »
millennials smdh

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10542
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57602 on: January 07, 2016, 06:52:48 AM »
we did it everyone


Fired up my DVR machine and rewatched Game 1 bottom of the 9th.
 :Woohoo: :excited: :love:


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57603 on: January 07, 2016, 10:44:45 AM »

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57604 on: January 07, 2016, 10:45:24 AM »
Hey guys, remember this?

https://twitter.com/Royals/status/685136367043489793

4 more years!

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57605 on: January 07, 2016, 10:45:57 AM »
We are going to win the 2016 World Series, aren't we?

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57606 on: January 07, 2016, 10:46:37 AM »
Dyson/Orlando should be v comparable to 2015 Rios, with better defense, right?

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67452
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57607 on: January 07, 2016, 10:48:22 AM »
Triples should have been the full time starter
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18070
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57608 on: January 07, 2016, 10:57:51 AM »
Dyson/Orlando should be v comparable to 2015 Rios, with better defense, right?

If last year is an indicator, Dyson/Orlando have more power than Rios too.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57609 on: January 07, 2016, 11:01:38 AM »
Dyson/Orlando should be v comparable to 2015 Rios, with better defense, right?

yes. As a 9 hole spot, Orlando/Dyson is sufficient

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57610 on: January 07, 2016, 11:15:49 AM »
Will we see Bubba this year?

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57611 on: January 07, 2016, 11:17:20 AM »
Maybe in August.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57612 on: January 07, 2016, 11:22:52 AM »

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57613 on: January 07, 2016, 11:31:28 AM »
having dyson play regularly will be so fun to watch.  they should still try to bring in span, if they can get him on a bargain contract, though.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18070
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57614 on: January 07, 2016, 11:40:43 AM »
I agree they should add some value outfield depth, particularly if they don't trust Bubba with it yet.  I would prefer an arm though.  If Soria is the new Holland, we still could use a guy for back end of rotation/middle innings eater.  Both can be budget rebound guys

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57615 on: January 07, 2016, 11:44:02 AM »
If we win a 3rd pennant in a row.  I mean, my god. 

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32519
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57616 on: January 07, 2016, 11:50:00 AM »
If we win a 3rd pennant in a row.  I mean, my god. 

It would put us in a very elite group of franchises for sure
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57617 on: January 07, 2016, 12:55:51 PM »

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13506
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57618 on: January 07, 2016, 12:59:50 PM »
bahaha that's awesome

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57619 on: January 07, 2016, 01:00:54 PM »
bahaha that's awesome
Yeah, I hate the guy, but that was a boss move.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57620 on: January 07, 2016, 01:09:12 PM »
the royals play in missouri.  what a dumbass.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57621 on: January 07, 2016, 01:10:34 PM »
He might live on the Kansas side, which I think he does, because he was at Barley's yesterday for lunch, right off 119th st.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57622 on: January 07, 2016, 01:14:04 PM »
He might live on the Kansas side, which I think he does, because he was at Barley's yesterday for lunch, right off 119th st.

Overland Park. Also a house in Lincoln, NE.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40535
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57623 on: January 07, 2016, 01:14:22 PM »
wacky i don't think it's healthy to take that as a "boss" move, but that's for the pit

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #57624 on: January 07, 2016, 01:16:30 PM »
He might live on the Kansas side.

entirely irrelevant to how he is taxed on his baseball salary.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."