Author Topic: The Royals  (Read 5804677 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4700 on: June 18, 2013, 08:18:10 PM »
who else was hitting better than their career norm under the maloof regime?

I'm not even sure what you're asking here.

i reread my question, and confirmed that it is perfectly clear what i'm asking.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4701 on: June 18, 2013, 08:38:58 PM »
gd bullpen.

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4702 on: June 18, 2013, 08:42:13 PM »
 :shakesfist:
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4703 on: June 18, 2013, 08:46:46 PM »
gd bullpen.

gd Herrera.    Someone get Lough in.  Oh god.. Moose.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4704 on: June 18, 2013, 08:51:34 PM »
gd bullpen.

gd Herrera.    Someone get Lough in.  Oh god.. Moose.

Thinking about taking back the good stuff I said recently about Hererra.

AND MOOSE WITH TWO HITS? Doesn't that about equal his entire number of hits for the month of May?

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4705 on: June 18, 2013, 08:56:54 PM »
 :facepalm:

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4706 on: June 18, 2013, 08:57:19 PM »
The eff was that
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4707 on: June 18, 2013, 08:57:32 PM »

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4708 on: June 18, 2013, 08:58:57 PM »
what... the ... eff

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20641
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4709 on: June 18, 2013, 08:59:38 PM »
BID!!!!!!!!

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4710 on: June 18, 2013, 09:02:05 PM »
.500 in June was fun while it lasted.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4711 on: June 18, 2013, 09:02:27 PM »
Eff that third base coach.

Why did Moose move up?

Jesus.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4712 on: June 18, 2013, 09:03:25 PM »
Eff that third base coach.

Why did Moose move up?

Jesus.
Didn't he give Lough the stop sign?


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4713 on: June 18, 2013, 09:04:24 PM »
you want to be pissed at that but ten minutes goes by and you're finally like wow that was just so rough ridin' unbelievable that i'm just going to laugh and go grab a beer or something. i mean i don't even know.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4714 on: June 18, 2013, 09:05:42 PM »
Eff that third base coach.

Why did Moose move up?

Jesus.
Didn't he give Lough the stop sign?

Yeah. Why the eff did he do that? Lough was rounding third and the ball wasn't even fielded yet.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4715 on: June 18, 2013, 09:07:37 PM »
Eff that third base coach.

Why did Moose move up?

Jesus.

moose moved up because he should have. if he didn't then we just have 1st and 2nd and another hit like that might not score him.

1st mistake- rodriguez not sending lough. i mean jesus.
2nd mistake- lough not seeing rodriguez hold him.
3rd mistake- lough semi stop then kind of going then kind of stopping.
4th mistake- lough taking his hand off the bag once he got back to third.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22787
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4716 on: June 18, 2013, 09:09:41 PM »
Eff that third base coach.

Why did Moose move up?

Jesus.
Didn't he give Lough the stop sign?

Yeah. Why the eff did he do that? Lough was rounding third and the ball wasn't even fielded yet.
Because there was one out and the best bat on the team was up.  I don't know.  He probably should have sent him, but he didn't. 

Either listen to your base coach and let the best bat on the team try to get you home with one out, or don't and try to score.  Make your decision before you're in no man's land.

Most of the blame falls on Lough imo.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16968
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4717 on: June 18, 2013, 09:24:18 PM »
royals gonna royal

Offline PIPE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1146
  • Always a pessimist
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4718 on: June 19, 2013, 09:52:08 AM »
I am glad I missed it and don't have to look for the replay...........you guys gave a pretty good explanation of what sounded like some  pretty putrid events.......

Back to the usual Royals??? :dunno:
Awaiting the inevitable KITN

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4719 on: June 19, 2013, 10:11:30 AM »
theyre a game back of .500 in june calm down idiots
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4720 on: June 19, 2013, 10:37:59 AM »
Sadly, we had the game in the bag before Herrerra took the mound in the 8th.  There is a reason he got sent down earlier.  His control is horrible.  He has a great arm but continues to leave his fastballs and change-ups high in the zone.  Collins did fine but was put in a horrible position.   
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40553
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4721 on: June 19, 2013, 10:40:54 AM »
Let's do some power rankings!  :D

Who you got?

1. St Louis
2. Detroit
3. Boston
4. Cincinnati
5. Atlanta
6. Oakland
7. Pittsburgh
8. Texas
9. Baltimore
10. Colorado
11. Arizona
12. New York Yankees
13. Kansas City
14. Tampa Bay
15. Cleveland
16. San Francisco
17. Toronto
18. San Diego
19. Los Angeles Angels
20. Washington
21. Chicago Cubs
22. Minnesota
23. Philadelphia
24. Chicago White Sox
25. Seattle
26. Los Angeles Dodgers
27. Milwaukee
28. New York Mets
29. Houston
30. Miami

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4722 on: June 19, 2013, 11:10:53 AM »
Let's do some power rankings!  :D

Who you got?

1. St Louis
2. Detroit
3. Boston
4. Cincinnati
5. Atlanta
6. Oakland
7. Pittsburgh
8. Texas
9. Baltimore
10. Colorado
11. Arizona
12. New York Yankees
13. Kansas City
14. Tampa Bay
15. Cleveland
16. San Francisco
17. Toronto
18. San Diego
19. Los Angeles Angels
20. Washington
21. Chicago Cubs
22. Minnesota
23. Philadelphia
24. Chicago White Sox
25. Seattle
26. Los Angeles Dodgers
27. Milwaukee
28. New York Mets
29. Houston
30. Miami

1. St Louis
2. Detroit
3. Boston
4. Cincinnati
5. Atlanta
6. San Francisco
7. Texas
8. Cleveland
9. Baltimore
10. Pittsburgh
11. Tampa Bay
12. New York Yankees
13.  Oakland
14. San Diego
15. Arizona
16. Colorado
17.  Kansas City
18. Toronto
19. Los Angeles Angels
20. Washington
21. Chicago Cubs
22. Los Angeles Dodgers
23. Philadelphia
24. Minnesota
25. Chicago White Sox
26. Seattle
27. Milwaukee
28. New York Mets
29. Houston
30. Miami

Offline Super PurpleCat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3576
  • purple hugs are back! get yours today
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4723 on: June 19, 2013, 01:54:16 PM »
theyre a game back of .500 in june calm down idiots

BUT SOMETHING  :curse:

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: The Royals
« Reply #4724 on: June 19, 2013, 03:37:45 PM »
I reeeally want to be in 2nd and 4 games back after tonight.