Author Topic: We're #24!!  (Read 3884 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
We're #24!!
« on: November 08, 2010, 11:59:14 AM »
Do you like old balls?  How do you like them old balls?




http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline cas4ksu

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2463
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2010, 12:13:13 PM »

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2010, 12:14:38 PM »
:facepalm:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2010, 12:16:16 PM »
I must have missed all the other thread about this...

T42YS

  • Guest
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2010, 12:22:33 PM »


rough ridin' hilarious book. A must-read for all literature and history buffs.

Offline ArchE_Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2010, 01:17:38 PM »
Being #24 in the BCS is like being the proverbial "last man on earth."

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2010, 01:21:42 PM »
Being #24 in the BCS is like being the proverbial "last man on earth."

What about the 100 or so teams not even ranked?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59544
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2010, 01:25:31 PM »
Has anyone seen Elwood Cat and jt in the same room at the same time??


Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2010, 02:21:27 PM »
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/511735-bcs-rankings-week-4-predicting-how-the-top-25-will-change-by-next-week#page/3

They don't seem to be as impressed as you are.  I will be if we upset Mizzou next week.

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #10 on: November 08, 2010, 02:30:47 PM »
Holy crap, that guy expects us to lose @ #17 Mizzou?  WTF?!?!?!?!?!?  And Texas isn't very good????  When the eff did this info become available??!!!

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7076
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #11 on: November 08, 2010, 02:34:24 PM »
lucky dawg found this bleacherreport place. those guys sure know there stuff.   :party:

had you told me we would have been ranked 1 week this season i would have crapped my pants laughing at you twice is better

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2010, 02:39:07 PM »
This is the second time we've made the BCS rankings this year, another reason to ignore that system.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2010, 02:40:56 PM »
This is the second time we've made the BCS rankings this year, another reason to ignore that system.

Nah.  I think I'll just ignore your dumbass instead.

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: We're #24!!
« Reply #14 on: November 08, 2010, 03:02:18 PM »
This is the second time we've made the BCS rankings this year, another reason to ignore that system.

Nah.  I think I'll just ignore your dumbass instead.
Seems like you missed that opportunity with your post.  You may want to use the word "dumbass" a little more carefully, dumbass.