0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: wetwillie on December 15, 2013, 03:37:51 PMQuote from: steve dave on December 15, 2013, 03:34:24 PMI don't think Sumlin is a very good coach. Texas isn't interested IMO (even outside of whatever weird contract stuff he may have)Neither does he, that is why he leveraged USC into a fat contract from aggy.what
Quote from: steve dave on December 15, 2013, 03:34:24 PMI don't think Sumlin is a very good coach. Texas isn't interested IMO (even outside of whatever weird contract stuff he may have)Neither does he, that is why he leveraged USC into a fat contract from aggy.
I don't think Sumlin is a very good coach. Texas isn't interested IMO (even outside of whatever weird contract stuff he may have)
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 15, 2013, 03:39:31 PMQuote from: wetwillie on December 15, 2013, 03:37:51 PMQuote from: steve dave on December 15, 2013, 03:34:24 PMI don't think Sumlin is a very good coach. Texas isn't interested IMO (even outside of whatever weird contract stuff he may have)Neither does he, that is why he leveraged USC into a fat contract from aggy.whatHe just got a nearly 2 million dollar raise from A&M after going 8-4 with. 500 conference record.
Who wins a Dr. Pepper 'ship first? Cats or Longhorns?
I don't think Sumlin would be anywhere close to the best hire UT could make but if I cared enough I'd go back and look for pro Kingsbury posts from the Sumlin isn't good crowd and mush some faces.
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 15, 2013, 03:56:51 PMI don't think Sumlin would be anywhere close to the best hire UT could make but if I cared enough I'd go back and look for pro Kingsbury posts from the Sumlin isn't good crowd and mush some faces.You can think Sumlin wouldn't be great for UT but think Kingsbury would be great for Tech. personally, I think the dumbest name being thrown around in this thread is Mahlzan or however you spell it.
Shaw would be a great hire for them.
Quote from: Limestone on December 15, 2013, 04:22:39 PMShaw would be a great hire for them.Who do you THINK they WILL hire, Limestone?!?
Quote from: Pete on December 15, 2013, 04:25:44 PMQuote from: Limestone on December 15, 2013, 04:22:39 PMShaw would be a great hire for them.Who do you THINK they WILL hire, Limestone?!?Franklin and I will lol
Quote from: Limestone on December 15, 2013, 04:35:17 PMQuote from: Pete on December 15, 2013, 04:25:44 PMQuote from: Limestone on December 15, 2013, 04:22:39 PMShaw would be a great hire for them.Who do you THINK they WILL hire, Limestone?!?Franklin and I will lolI agree with all three of Limestone's sentiments but the Chip Kelly rumor is interesting
Why micat? His head coaching record is very limited but remarkable.
Gottlieb tweeting about Mack today said that not only did Mack recruit manziel, and RG3, but also jameis Winston......all for DB. For those not counting, that is the last three Heisman winners.Landing any one of the three and he still has a job. Land all three and he is saban.Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 15, 2013, 04:03:34 PMWhy micat? His head coaching record is very limited but remarkable."his coaching record is very limited" is reason enough. Has he been anywhere longer than two years? Maybe as OC at Auburn?
Quote from: CNS on December 15, 2013, 05:03:52 PMGottlieb tweeting about Mack today said that not only did Mack recruit manziel, and RG3, but also jameis Winston......all for DB. For those not counting, that is the last three Heisman winners.Landing any one of the three and he still has a job. Land all three and he is saban.Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2Uh no because he was recruiting them as DBs, his inability to identify a qb is why he now works for the LHN.Quote from: michigancat on December 15, 2013, 05:06:17 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 15, 2013, 04:03:34 PMWhy micat? His head coaching record is very limited but remarkable."his coaching record is very limited" is reason enough. Has he been anywhere longer than two years? Maybe as OC at Auburn? Nick Saban better job rule