Author Topic: ksu ladycats  (Read 188922 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1400 on: March 13, 2017, 09:53:34 PM »
Was that when they played ND? Canary was just telling me about that.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1401 on: March 13, 2017, 09:53:50 PM »
I know for sure they hosted at least once in the Oldhe/Wecker/Koehn years
Mahoney was my fave

Offline Poster formerly known as jthutch

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1765
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1402 on: March 14, 2017, 09:54:29 AM »
Was that when they played ND? Canary was just telling me about that.
Yep I went to that game.

Offline Joker

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1395
  • Resident Play-Hard Chartologist
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1403 on: March 14, 2017, 10:26:58 AM »
I know for sure they hosted at least once in the Oldhe/Wecker/Koehn years
Mahoney was my fave

Made a jersey for one of the games with her number on it and "Ma-Honey" on the back.  :gocho:

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1404 on: March 14, 2017, 12:20:55 PM »
Haha love it. A friend of mine that liked me called her Megan Mafloozyhoney

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44810
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1405 on: March 15, 2017, 02:01:56 AM »
This is the fifth time we've hosted. That Notre Dame game was awful, terrible upset at the time, they won the national championship the next year.

I don't think we're going to make it out of Manhattan this year either. IF we beat Drake, they're very very very good, I don't think we have anything for Stanford.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3753
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1406 on: March 15, 2017, 07:34:48 AM »
This is the fifth time we've hosted. That Notre Dame game was awful, terrible upset at the time, they won the national championship the next year.

I don't think we're going to make it out of Manhattan this year either. IF we beat Drake, they're very very very good, I don't think we have anything for Stanford.

Drake is ok and not an easy win at all, but if the good version of this team shows up it's no contest. The good version of this can also run with Stanford if they come out ready to play. Of course the version of this team that lost to Northern Iowa could show up at any point and either team could run us by 20+

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1407 on: March 15, 2017, 12:28:37 PM »
Pretty sure I'll be at the game Saturday!

Offline Canary

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2962
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1408 on: March 18, 2017, 12:44:12 PM »
Who's going to be at the game today?

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1409 on: March 18, 2017, 01:35:48 PM »
Probably all already there scouting Stanford.

Offline Canary

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2962
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1410 on: March 18, 2017, 01:38:25 PM »
So let's get out asses to the Bram

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1411 on: March 18, 2017, 01:38:50 PM »
I'm waiting on my damned ride

Offline Canary

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2962
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1412 on: March 18, 2017, 01:45:14 PM »
I am sure he's within five minutes

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1413 on: March 18, 2017, 06:53:32 PM »
did you make it sundance pound sign kid?

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1414 on: March 18, 2017, 09:15:07 PM »
I did. I didn't know you were around for pound sterling days. Intriguing. Anyway. I was more pissed at the game today than I was about the men. So so so so many turnovers. Last I checked it was 17 in 30 minutes. Anyway. Glad they won. We are super long and play great defense. I think we give Stanford a game if we cut down turnovers and take open shots. Every girl played. This team is very deep.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44810
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1415 on: March 18, 2017, 10:00:48 PM »
I'm not sure why you were pissed, I tried to tell you guys how good Drake is, that was their first loss since December. I think we're going to get rolled on Monday night.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1416 on: March 18, 2017, 11:02:04 PM »
I did. I didn't know you were around for pound sterling days. Intriguing.

I've been around since 2006.

Anyway. I was more pissed at the game today than I was about the men. So so so so many turnovers. Last I checked it was 17 in 30 minutes. Anyway. Glad they won. We are super long and play great defense. I think we give Stanford a game if we cut down turnovers and take open shots. Every girl played. This team is very deep.

I'm not sure why you were pissed, I tried to tell you guys how good Drake is, that was their first loss since December. I think we're going to get rolled on Monday night.

I'm just happy that Mittie appears to have been a solid hire. Maybe not elite, but he seems to have turned the ship around after Deb went downhill.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1417 on: March 18, 2017, 11:59:44 PM »
I'm not sure why you were pissed, I tried to tell you guys how good Drake is, that was their first loss since December. I think we're going to get rolled on Monday night.
We literally passed the ball to them at least 10 times. Drake is good. But KSU should know not to pass to a blue jersey.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1418 on: March 19, 2017, 12:01:50 AM »
Unforced turnovers are aggrevating. Did you watch the game MIR? Am I missing something about all the terrible passes right at Drake?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44810
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1419 on: March 19, 2017, 12:30:30 AM »
They play a very aggressive zone and they bait passes into passing lanes that aren't really open. They averaged 11 steals per game, man. They are long, although not nearly as long as we are. The way you best a zone like that is to move the ball quickly, it's why Baylor beats the hell out of us, much worse than the other good teams in the conference, all of their players could pass the ball. Frankly i was surprised we handled Drake as well as we did, I thought we'd have a lot more turnovers because I thought Hittner would do a better job on Lewis and I thought our guards would turn the ball over more. However, that game seemed never in doubt.

Hittner is only a freshman by the way, she can start nearly everywhere. Drake has done a great job of recruiting the states of Kansas and Missouri. Baranczyk is going to get a great deal to leave Drake, if KU was smart they'd fire that jackass they have now and hire Jenny, she's legit. The only real difference between Drake and K-State is depth.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1420 on: March 19, 2017, 12:57:57 AM »
So you watched the game or you didnt?

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1421 on: March 19, 2017, 12:59:04 AM »
It's not like Drake players were moving into passing lanes. They were standing in place and the ball was sent right into their mitts.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1422 on: March 19, 2017, 01:00:10 AM »
Or not lobbing the ball high enough over the defender and them sticking a hand up in the post and running the other way with the ball. It wasn't a scheme that I'm mad about.

If you didn't watch the game as your comments clearly state that you didn't, just butt out. Knowing about a team and reading a stat sheet does not and informed opinion make.



Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1423 on: March 19, 2017, 01:05:49 AM »
I did. I didn't know you were around for pound sterling days. Intriguing.

I've been around since 2006.

Anyway. I was more pissed at the game today than I was about the men. So so so so many turnovers. Last I checked it was 17 in 30 minutes. Anyway. Glad they won. We are super long and play great defense. I think we give Stanford a game if we cut down turnovers and take open shots. Every girl played. This team is very deep.

I'm not sure why you were pissed, I tried to tell you guys how good Drake is, that was their first loss since December. I think we're going to get rolled on Monday night.

I'm just happy that Mittie appears to have been a solid hire. Maybe not elite, but he seems to have turned the ship around after Deb went downhill.
Mittie was a solid hire and a treat to watch coach. Im glad KSU has one solid bball coach.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44810
    • View Profile
Re: ksu ladycats
« Reply #1424 on: March 19, 2017, 02:16:51 AM »
Of course I watched the game, SdK, odd that you think I didn't.